Course record COMM
COMM 3410
Intercultural Communication
University of Colorado Boulder
1,277 grades31 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Blessed E Ngoe 25 grades · 1 term 3.92GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ngoe vs. the course average
A
+43.0
B
−29.6
C
−10.5
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 1 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.70
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.51
Reflection4.76
Respect4.73
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.61
Questions4.31
Faryha Salim 155 grades · 1 term 3.75GPA
155 letter grades
Compare with the course
Salim vs. the course average
A
+34.1
B
−25.2
C
−9.2
D
−1.1
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 1 of 156 enrolled.
Emily Therese Loker 72 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Loker vs. the course average
A
+13.7
B
−11.4
C
−0.8
D
+0.3
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.76
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.70
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.26
Reflection4.62
Respect4.41
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.23
Questions4.82
Kelly Bjorklund 53 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bjorklund vs. the course average
A
+5.5
B
+0.4
C
−2.9
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 53 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.85
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.63
Reflection4.77
Respect4.76
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.64
Questions4.61
Nancy Kathoki Maingi 148 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
148 letter grades
Compare with the course
Maingi vs. the course average
A
+7.8
B
−4.5
C
−3.1
D
+0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 3 of 151 enrolled.
Lisa Lorraine Poole 26 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Poole vs. the course average
A
−18.4
B
+27.9
C
−6.6
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.
Overall3.86 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.00
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect3.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.90
Questions3.90
David Boromisza 54 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Boromisza vs. the course average
A
−4.9
B
+3.4
C
+2.5
D
−1.1
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 2 of 56 enrolled.
Charles Vincent Russell 26 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Russell vs. the course average
A
−10.7
B
+20.3
C
−6.6
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.
Erica Lynne Delgadillo 271 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
271 letter grades
Compare with the course
Delgadillo vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
−1.5
C
+3.2
D
+0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 13 of 284 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
127 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology3.99
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.74
Reflection4.08
Respect4.59
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.04
Questions4.05
Joelle M Cruz 124 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
124 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cruz vs. the course average
A
−9.5
B
+12.4
C
−2.4
D
−0.3
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 2 of 126 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.83
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.54
Reflection4.71
Respect4.81
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Salwa Kazi 47 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kazi vs. the course average
A
−16.8
B
+13.2
C
+6.5
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 1 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.65
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.52
Reflection4.69
Respect4.87
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.67
Questions4.82
Elisa Mercedes Varela 38 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Varela vs. the course average
A
−18.8
B
+16.4
C
+2.7
D
−1.1
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.54
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.34
Reflection4.47
Respect4.55
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.25
Questions4.48
Kimberly Campbell 67 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Campbell vs. the course average
A
−20.2
B
+17.2
C
+5.9
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
8.2% withdrew · 6 of 73 enrolled.
Overall3.85 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.52
Synthesis3.62
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.34
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.33
Grading3.23
Reflection3.93
Respect4.03
Creativity3.59
Feedback3.12
Interaction4.34
Challenge3.57
Questions3.30
Tiara Rose Naputi 128 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
128 letter grades
Compare with the course
Naputi vs. the course average
A
−19.4
B
+7.8
C
+8.3
D
+2.8
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 2 of 130 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.76
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.24
Reflection4.74
Respect4.83
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.66
Questions4.53
Joanne Christine Marras Tate 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.02GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
4.5% withdrew · 1 of 22 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.99
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.96
Respect4.99
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.96
Interaction3.29
Challenge4.96
Questions4.82
Shaundi Crystal Newbolt 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.84GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
4.3% withdrew · 1 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.30
Questions4.10
Nancy Maingi Ngwu 120 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.65
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.51
Reflection4.57
Respect4.66
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.61
Questions4.52
Kathryn Leslie 6 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Quaquilla Rhea Walker 9 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Bernardita Maria Yunis 12 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.98
Connection5.00
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.72
Questions4.34
Emaan Tawfiq Salim 75 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.87
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.56
Reflection4.69
Respect4.84
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.75
Questions4.78
Kellie Anne Hope Brownlee 13 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.38
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.42
Reflection4.54
Respect4.98
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.81
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Cody J Walizer 4 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Yitong Ma 3 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.70
Questions5.00
Jessica Ann Johnson 21 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.59
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.18
Reflection4.48
Respect4.59
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.45
Questions4.15
Robert Razzante 15 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.75
Contribution4.63
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.65
Reflection4.66
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Ula Adamska 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mervenur Cetin 1 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction2.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Rebecca Avalos 11 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.54
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.34
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.78
Questions5.00
Jone Laura Brunelle 12 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.50
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.25
Questions4.15
Clintia Simon 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.