Course record COMM
COMM 3210
Communication Theory
University of Colorado Boulder
571 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Timothy R Kuhn 571 grades · 1 term 2.57GPA
571 letter grades
1.2% withdrew · 7 of 578 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
197 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.64
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.46
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.63
Questions4.67
Sarah June Schneider Gilchriese 24 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.55
Miriam Hadassah Ward 23 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Dana K Harrington 13 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Colleen G Campbell 21 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.94
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.98
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sean Kenney 32 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.76
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.90
Reflection4.78
Respect4.77
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.78
Questions4.92
Laine Zizka 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Jayne Mallory Simpson 15 reported responses 3.35Eval / 5
Overall3.35 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology3.62
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration2.31
Connection3.96
Contribution3.76
Discussion3.35
Inclusivity3.35
Grading2.96
Reflection3.99
Respect3.92
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.24
Interaction3.38
Challenge3.89
Questions3.54
Tajshen Geneva Campbell 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Hannah Luz 40 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology3.98
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.36
Contribution3.64
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.03
Reflection4.11
Respect4.23
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.26
Challenge3.79
Questions4.07
Christy Dale Maurer 86 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.31
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.57
Grading3.89
Reflection4.18
Respect4.57
Creativity4.29
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.34
Questions3.87
Morgan Gimblet 58 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.62
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.17
Reflection4.57
Respect4.65
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.44
Questions4.49
Joseph Lee 17 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.84
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration3.66
Connection3.66
Contribution3.18
Discussion3.41
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.14
Reflection3.28
Respect3.92
Creativity3.34
Feedback3.12
Interaction3.41
Challenge3.43
Questions3.75
Christy Dale Sims 34 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.10
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.70
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.50
Questions3.40
Omedi Ochieng 1 reported responses 3.35Eval / 5
Overall3.35 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.