Course record COMM
COMM 2650
Business and Professional Communication
University of Colorado Boulder
417 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed record
Jone Laura Brunelle 26 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brunelle vs. the course average
A
+34.3
B
−33.8
C
+1.0
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 1 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Deepti Khedekar 78 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
78 letter grades
Compare with the course
Khedekar vs. the course average
A
−1.6
B
+4.7
C
−1.6
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 79 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.79
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.59
Reflection4.61
Respect4.88
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.57
Questions4.86
Elizabeth Kay Meyers Bass 28 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bass vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−9.1
C
+0.7
D
+2.9
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Sean Kenney 242 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
242 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kenney vs. the course average
A
+1.9
B
same
C
−1.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 2 of 244 enrolled.
Overall4.84 / 5
204 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.82
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.93
Reflection4.72
Respect4.97
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.61
Questions4.74
Ellie Nicole Busch 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.44GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.21
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.21
Kimberly Campbell 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
12.0% withdrew · 3 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.35
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.22
Grading3.87
Reflection4.04
Respect4.94
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.81
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.26
Questions4.04
Audra Kelly Barber 12 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.92
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection5.00
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.92
Reflection4.92
Respect4.92
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.78
Questions4.85
Jayne Mallory Simpson 2 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Joseph Lee 21 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.74
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.14
Grading3.73
Reflection3.96
Respect4.56
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.32
Challenge3.83
Questions4.56
Michael Burns 8 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Jody L Jahn 6 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Kelly Bjorklund 13 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Sarah Jane Blithe 2 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Hannah C Drain 5 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.