Course record COMM
COMM 2410
The Practice of Intercultural Communication
University of Colorado Boulder
544 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Jone Laura Brunelle 51 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brunelle vs. the course average
A
+30.8
B
−18.6
C
−6.5
D
−1.7
F
−4.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 51 enrolled.
Overall4.85 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.85
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.60
Blessed E Ngoe 77 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ngoe vs. the course average
A
+22.4
B
−18.6
C
−2.0
D
−0.4
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 78 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration3.07
Connection4.27
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.26
Reflection4.25
Respect4.27
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction3.22
Challenge4.26
Questions4.26
Jessica Ann Johnson 51 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Johnson vs. the course average
A
+17.0
B
−18.6
C
+3.3
D
+0.3
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.64
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.81
Grading3.72
Reflection4.51
Respect4.64
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.27
Questions3.22
Danielle Soibelman 25 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Soibelman vs. the course average
A
+12.5
B
−14.3
C
−0.5
D
−1.7
F
+4.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Overall4.89 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Salwa Kazi 77 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kazi vs. the course average
A
−4.9
B
+12.5
C
−8.5
D
−1.7
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 2 of 79 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.92
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.47
Reflection4.80
Respect4.84
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.53
Questions4.18
Kellie Anne Hope Brownlee 48 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
48 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brownlee vs. the course average
A
−7.6
B
−1.2
C
+8.2
D
+0.4
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
David Boromisza 119 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
119 letter grades
Compare with the course
Boromisza vs. the course average
A
−14.3
B
+15.9
C
−1.7
D
+1.7
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 2 of 121 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.70
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.76
Reflection4.91
Respect4.92
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.68
Questions4.98
Mervenur Cetin 74 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
74 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cetin vs. the course average
A
−27.1
B
+12.9
C
+9.1
D
−0.3
F
+5.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 75 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.14
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.45
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.05
Reflection4.22
Respect4.56
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.21
Questions4.29
Shaundi Crystal Newbolt 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.26GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 2 of 24 enrolled.
Overall3.34 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.80
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading2.80
Reflection2.80
Respect4.20
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.00
Questions2.00
David Boromisza-Habashi 132 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.99
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.67
Reflection4.75
Respect4.98
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.81
Questions4.83
Dustin J Martinez 5 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Ula Adamska 36 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.77
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.41
Reflection4.50
Respect4.77
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.55
Questions4.51
Yitong Ma 28 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.43
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.01
Reflection4.11
Respect4.47
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.05
Questions4.41
Morgan Gimblet 64 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.87
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.76
Reflection4.49
Respect4.84
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.55
Questions4.53
Winifred Sekyibea Abakah 33 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.36
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Michelle Brown 4 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.61
Connection5.00
Contribution4.74
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.87
Respect5.00
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.87
Challenge3.43
Questions5.00
Kaylee Sugimoto 1 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Connection5.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.