Course record COMM
COMM 2400
Discourse, Culture and Identities
University of Colorado Boulder
2,115 grades35 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Kerry Gretchen Love 190 grades · 1 term 3.98GPA
190 letter grades
Compare with the course
Love vs. the course average
A
+42.9
B
−29.2
C
−9.2
D
−1.7
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 190 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
139 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.85
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.51
Reflection4.80
Respect4.91
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Rebecca Avalos 25 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Avalos vs. the course average
A
+28.5
B
−18.7
C
−9.2
D
−1.7
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
7.4% withdrew · 2 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Blessed E Ngoe 51 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ngoe vs. the course average
A
+32.7
B
−26.8
C
−9.2
D
+0.2
F
+3.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.23
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.70
Reflection4.71
Respect4.79
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.52
Questions4.26
Emily Therese Loker 104 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
104 letter grades
Compare with the course
Loker vs. the course average
A
+14.7
B
−7.7
C
−5.4
D
+0.2
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 3 of 107 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Dana K Harrington 52 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
52 letter grades
Compare with the course
Harrington vs. the course average
A
+8.0
B
−3.8
C
−3.5
D
+0.2
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 2 of 54 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Danielle Michelle Hodge 70 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
70 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hodge vs. the course average
A
−2.7
B
+13.6
C
−6.4
D
−1.7
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 2 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.91 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.87
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.93
Reflection4.93
Respect4.93
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.93
Questions4.87
Kerri E Moncrieff 225 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
225 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moncrieff vs. the course average
A
+5.8
B
−0.5
C
−3.0
D
−0.4
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 9 of 234 enrolled.
Overall3.96 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology3.55
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.28
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.41
Grading3.15
Reflection4.03
Respect4.68
Creativity3.69
Feedback3.09
Interaction4.59
Challenge3.82
Questions3.02
Colleen G Campbell 206 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
206 letter grades
Compare with the course
Campbell vs. the course average
A
−6.5
B
+14.4
C
−4.4
D
−1.7
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 3 of 209 enrolled.
Overall4.89 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.94
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.78
Reflection4.89
Respect4.92
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Natasha Shrikant 139 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
139 letter grades
Compare with the course
Shrikant vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
−2.0
C
+0.9
D
+1.1
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 5 of 144 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.10
Reflection3.93
Respect4.44
Creativity3.58
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.51
Challenge3.93
Questions4.14
Kellie Anne Hope Brownlee 100 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brownlee vs. the course average
A
−5.5
B
+7.3
C
+1.8
D
−1.7
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 3 of 103 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.25
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Carolin Aurian 30 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Aurian vs. the course average
A
+7.8
B
−14.1
C
+4.1
D
+1.6
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Leah Mh Sprain 27 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sprain vs. the course average
A
−7.4
B
+10.0
C
−1.8
D
−1.7
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.00 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.60
Questions4.40
Angie White Davlyn 375 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
375 letter grades
Compare with the course
Davlyn vs. the course average
A
−10.7
B
+4.5
C
+3.0
D
+0.4
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 17 of 392 enrolled.
Laurie J Moroco 167 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
167 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moroco vs. the course average
A
−10.0
B
−1.4
C
+9.9
D
+1.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 8 of 175 enrolled.
Overall3.92 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.12
Collaboration3.91
Connection3.69
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity4.07
Grading2.93
Reflection3.40
Respect4.10
Creativity3.66
Feedback2.96
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.33
Questions3.43
Miriam Hadassah Ward 125 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
125 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ward vs. the course average
A
−12.3
B
+3.7
C
+6.0
D
+1.5
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 5 of 130 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.57
Reflection4.53
Respect4.67
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.47
Questions4.63
Christy Dale Maurer 80 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
80 letter grades
Compare with the course
Maurer vs. the course average
A
−20.5
B
+19.3
C
+2.0
D
+0.8
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 81 enrolled.
Overall4.12 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.34
Technology4.28
Synthesis3.58
Collaboration2.86
Connection4.05
Contribution3.58
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.82
Grading3.57
Reflection3.10
Respect4.28
Creativity3.58
Feedback3.33
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions4.04
Joanne Christine Marras Tate 50 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tate vs. the course average
A
−31.5
B
+19.3
C
+10.8
D
+2.3
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 51 enrolled.
Overall4.06 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.95
Contribution4.03
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.05
Reflection3.96
Respect4.40
Creativity4.46
Feedback3.12
Interaction3.56
Challenge3.97
Questions4.51
Quaquilla Rhea Walker 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.20GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Overall3.48 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.00
Questions3.30
Tajshen Geneva Campbell 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.87GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
4.3% withdrew · 1 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration3.32
Connection4.99
Contribution4.98
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.16
Reflection4.99
Respect4.99
Creativity4.57
Feedback3.34
Interaction3.33
Challenge4.99
Questions3.21
Leonarda Garcia-Jimenez 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.80GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
9.1% withdrew · 2 of 22 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Elisa Mercedes Varela 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.65GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
4.3% withdrew · 1 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.52
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.72
Reflection4.56
Respect4.76
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.50
Questions4.68
Jone Laura Brunelle 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.62GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
21.1% withdrew · 4 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.42
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.23
Reflection4.50
Respect4.61
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.37
Questions4.38
Ngoe Blessed Efilo 51 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.64
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.44
Reflection4.61
Respect4.94
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.64
Questions4.81
Claire Chase 8 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.00
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.73
Reflection3.78
Respect4.85
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.85
Questions4.73
Angela White Davlyn 138 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.50
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.46
Reflection4.26
Respect4.77
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.31
Questions4.29
Hadassah Ward 48 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.83
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.81
Reflection4.77
Respect4.83
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.83
Questions4.81
Salwa Kazi 22 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Michelle Brown 18 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.54
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.97
Reflection4.51
Respect4.97
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.85
Questions4.48
Clintia Simon 31 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.48
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.51
Reflection4.52
Respect4.98
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.62
Questions4.51
Kristella Montiegel 11 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.62
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.61
Reflection4.78
Respect4.80
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.59
Questions4.63
Ula Adamska 46 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.54
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.07
Reflection4.44
Respect4.91
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.62
Questions4.57
Yitong Ma 19 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.79
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.64
Reflection4.74
Respect4.88
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.74
Questions4.82
Mervenur Cetin 20 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.29
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.41
Reflection4.32
Respect4.66
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.31
Questions4.61
Mikayla Torres 5 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.93
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.84
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.93
Grading5.00
Reflection4.84
Respect4.84
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.93
Questions4.84
Alison Friedrich 1 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.