Course record COMM
COMM 2320
The Craft of Argument
University of Colorado Boulder
362 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score36/100
Below average
Mikayla Torres 80 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
80 letter grades
Compare with the course
Torres vs. the course average
A
+30.1
B
−22.7
C
−6.8
D
−1.5
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 2 of 82 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.96
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.99
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions4.97
Amber Kelsie 71 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
71 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kelsie vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
+7.2
C
−6.6
D
−2.8
F
−4.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 2 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.95
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.77
Reflection4.66
Respect4.84
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.76
Questions4.78
Cody J Walizer 52 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
52 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walizer vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+13.5
C
−2.2
D
−2.8
F
−4.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 53 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.89
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.74
Reflection4.90
Respect4.83
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.63
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions4.84
Hunter C Thompson 27 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Thompson vs. the course average
A
+14.3
B
−17.9
C
+6.8
D
−2.8
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Laine Zizka 27 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zizka vs. the course average
A
−7.9
B
+0.6
C
+10.5
D
−2.8
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.15
Connection4.51
Contribution3.16
Discussion3.62
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.07
Reflection4.04
Respect4.08
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.06
Challenge4.07
Questions4.54
Marc H Rich 86 grades · 1 term 2.55GPA
86 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rich vs. the course average
A
−32.3
B
+13.5
C
+9.4
D
+5.4
F
+4.0
Difference in percentage points.
8.5% withdrew · 8 of 94 enrolled.
Overall3.90 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.61
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration2.79
Connection4.10
Contribution3.64
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity3.87
Grading2.96
Reflection3.67
Respect4.47
Creativity3.72
Feedback3.02
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.65
Questions3.62
Michael Warren Cook 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Myles Wade Mason 14 reported responses 2.66Eval / 5
Overall2.66 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.01
Technology2.31
Synthesis2.79
Collaboration2.09
Connection2.41
Contribution2.75
Discussion2.41
Inclusivity2.75
Grading2.43
Reflection2.01
Respect2.63
Creativity2.47
Feedback2.24
Interaction2.85
Challenge2.47
Questions2.43
Kellie Anne Hope Brownlee 7 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.61
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.38
Reflection4.77
Respect4.55
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.62
Questions4.62
Christy Dale Maurer 33 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.49
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.62
Reflection4.49
Respect4.80
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.62
Blessed E Ngoe 17 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.77
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.14
Reflection4.70
Respect4.98
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.72
Questions4.42
Dani Soibelman 9 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration2.76
Connection4.58
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.35
Reflection3.95
Respect4.65
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.49
Interaction3.77
Challenge4.70
Questions4.05
Sunday De Los Santos 13 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.18
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.97
Reflection4.12
Respect4.42
Creativity4.58
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.58
Questions4.42
Dustin J Martinez 1 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction1.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Salwa Kazi 2 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection3.50
Respect3.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.