Course record COMM
COMM 1600
Group Interaction
University of Colorado Boulder
1,229 grades21 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Jody L Jahn 207 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
207 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jahn vs. the course average
A
+33.0
B
−22.6
C
−9.0
D
−1.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 4 of 211 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.60
Reflection3.60
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.80
Questions4.00
Michael Burns 150 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
150 letter grades
Compare with the course
Burns vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
+10.1
C
−3.2
D
−0.9
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 152 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
413 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.69
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.61
Reflection4.53
Respect4.68
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.58
Questions4.61
Leah Mh Sprain 872 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
872 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sprain vs. the course average
A
−6.9
B
+3.6
C
+2.7
D
+0.4
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 27 of 899 enrolled.
Overall3.79 / 5
373 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.64
Synthesis3.62
Collaboration4.02
Connection3.70
Contribution3.46
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity3.99
Grading3.14
Reflection3.57
Respect3.95
Creativity3.45
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.91
Challenge3.38
Questions3.45
Jake K Townsend 51 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.58
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.68
Reflection4.71
Respect4.85
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.72
Questions4.87
Deepti Khedekar 46 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.54
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.49
Reflection4.58
Respect4.91
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.54
Questions4.74
Miriam Hadassah Ward 23 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Blessed E Ngoe 35 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.75
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Faryha Salim 32 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.05
Reflection4.45
Respect4.60
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Colette Czarnecki 15 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.25
Reflection4.15
Respect4.65
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge3.45
Questions3.60
Sarah Neitzel 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.45
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Sean Kenney 13 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Elisa Mercedes Varela 14 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.60
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Quinn Lynch 35 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.45
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.37
Reflection4.43
Respect4.81
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.64
Questions4.68
Tyler Hickman 13 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.50
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Clintia Simon 49 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology3.62
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.61
Connection3.30
Contribution4.11
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.10
Reflection3.82
Respect3.84
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.03
Interaction4.58
Challenge3.45
Questions3.43
Ula Adamska 44 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.56
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.70
Contribution4.09
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity3.76
Grading3.56
Reflection3.87
Respect4.14
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.74
Questions3.98
Cassidy Moore 36 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.39
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.84
Reflection4.55
Respect4.86
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.46
Questions4.80
Mikayla Torres 4 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.20
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.80
Xiaodong Yan 50 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.02
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.19
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.06
Inclusivity3.99
Grading3.79
Reflection4.09
Respect4.47
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.88
Questions3.77
Ava Mamary 126 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
126 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.57
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.66
Reflection4.51
Respect4.45
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.61
Questions4.61
Kaylee Sugimoto 120 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.56
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.62
Reflection4.62
Respect4.75
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.50
Questions4.73
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.