Course record COMM
COMM 1300
Public Speaking
University of Colorado Boulder
2,080 grades32 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed record
Kerry Gretchen Love 335 grades · 1 term 3.87GPA
335 letter grades
Compare with the course
Love vs. the course average
A
+27.1
B
−18.7
C
−4.7
D
−1.0
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 7 of 342 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.70
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.73
Reflection4.69
Respect4.86
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.58
Questions4.75
Yessica Yamilet Rincon 34 grades · 1 term 3.84GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rincon vs. the course average
A
+23.7
B
−15.8
C
−3.9
D
−1.3
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Jamie L Skerski 37 grades · 1 term 3.68GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Skerski vs. the course average
A
+24.6
B
−22.0
C
−1.4
D
−1.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall3.91 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.05
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.70
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.85
Questions3.55
Hunter C Thompson 36 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Thompson vs. the course average
A
+16.0
B
−8.0
C
−4.0
D
−1.3
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 2 of 38 enrolled.
Denee Allison Janda 92 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
92 letter grades
Compare with the course
Janda vs. the course average
A
+6.1
B
−2.9
C
−2.5
D
−0.2
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 93 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.71
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.94
Reflection4.88
Respect4.99
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.74
Questions4.95
Cody J Walizer 139 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
139 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walizer vs. the course average
A
+9.5
B
−7.4
C
−3.2
D
+0.1
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 4 of 143 enrolled.
Overall4.88 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.66
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.88
Reflection4.82
Respect4.94
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.84
Questions4.86
Dustin J Martinez 59 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Martinez vs. the course average
A
+4.9
B
−2.6
C
−1.7
D
−1.3
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 1 of 60 enrolled.
Overall4.87 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.73
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.86
Reflection4.86
Respect4.92
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.86
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions4.81
Danielle Hartman 36 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hartman vs. the course average
A
+4.9
B
+0.3
C
−4.0
D
−1.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.19
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.48
Reflection4.32
Respect4.66
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.66
Questions4.80
Jayne Mallory Simpson 37 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Simpson vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
−0.3
C
−1.4
D
+1.4
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect3.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Audra Kelly Barber 231 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
231 letter grades
Compare with the course
Barber vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+2.2
C
+1.0
D
−0.4
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 8 of 239 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
164 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.57
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.67
Reflection4.63
Respect4.75
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.56
Questions4.80
Grant Charles Pustelnik 71 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
71 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pustelnik vs. the course average
A
−9.6
B
+7.7
C
+1.6
D
+1.5
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.6% withdrew · 5 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.49
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.96
Reflection4.43
Respect4.61
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.63
Questions4.35
Elizabeth Kay Meyers Bass 275 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
275 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bass vs. the course average
A
−15.5
B
+13.5
C
+1.2
D
−0.2
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 9 of 284 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.52
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.92
Reflection4.37
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.60
Questions4.87
Kasey Sisson 271 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
271 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sisson vs. the course average
A
−7.7
B
+4.1
C
+1.7
D
+0.9
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 15 of 286 enrolled.
Overall3.65 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.56
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.59
Connection4.11
Contribution3.96
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity3.79
Grading3.59
Reflection3.65
Respect3.96
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.02
Interaction3.98
Challenge3.90
Questions3.12
Jessica Ann Johnson 169 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
169 letter grades
Compare with the course
Johnson vs. the course average
A
−10.1
B
+2.6
C
+6.8
D
+0.5
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 10 of 179 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
143 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.58
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.47
Reflection4.34
Respect4.70
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.41
Questions4.03
Karen B Reid 54 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reid vs. the course average
A
−20.1
B
+17.9
C
+2.4
D
+2.4
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 3 of 57 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.59
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.60
Reflection4.34
Respect4.76
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.49
Questions4.70
Mara Faith Singer 37 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Singer vs. the course average
A
−7.8
B
+2.4
C
+1.3
D
−1.3
F
+5.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.65
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Kerri E Moncrieff 36 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moncrieff vs. the course average
A
−14.6
B
+14.2
C
−4.0
D
−1.3
F
+5.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.
Shaundi Crystal Newbolt 38 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Newbolt vs. the course average
A
−19.8
B
+4.3
C
+9.0
D
+6.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 39 enrolled.
Overall3.11 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology3.65
Synthesis2.75
Collaboration3.40
Connection2.70
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.05
Grading2.40
Reflection2.80
Respect3.55
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.10
Questions2.70
Marc H Rich 37 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rich vs. the course average
A
−56.5
B
+48.3
C
+9.4
D
−1.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.30
Reflection4.45
Respect4.45
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.30
Terrell Jake Dionne 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.
Dynae Trone 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.57GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
10.0% withdrew · 2 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.62
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.75
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.78
Questions4.82
Ully Damari Putri 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.33GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Cassidy Moore 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Dani Soibelman 3 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joanne Christine Marras Tate 3 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.77
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.77
Reflection4.32
Respect4.77
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.55
Questions4.55
Jillian Storme Davidson 15 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Marissa Ashley Lammon 53 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.73
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.78
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.69
Questions4.87
Emaan Tawfiq Salim 7 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.50
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.38
Reflection4.67
Respect4.50
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.50
Questions4.38
Millicent Elewosi 56 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.35
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.02
Reflection4.32
Respect4.72
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.38
Questions4.63
Ab Burns 30 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.48
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.62
Reflection4.48
Respect4.55
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.40
Questions4.55
Maya Cancio Vendel 49 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.46
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.78
Reflection4.53
Respect4.73
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.71
Questions4.79
Ava Mamary 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.