Course record COMM

COMM 1210

Perspectives on Human Communication

University of Colorado Boulder

2,601 grades47 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average

Professors 47 of 47

Kelly Bjorklund 113 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
80.5% A
10.6% B
3.5% C
4.4% D
0.9% F

113 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bjorklund vs. the course average
A +36.6
B −27.1
C −9.0
D +1.4
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 113 enrolled.

Kendra L Gale 35 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
37.1% A
51.4% B
11.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

35 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gale vs. the course average
A −6.8
B +13.8
C −1.1
D −3.0
F −2.9

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.

Myles Wade Mason 96 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
54.2% A
32.3% B
10.4% C
2.1% D
1.0% F

96 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mason vs. the course average
A +10.3
B −5.4
C −2.1
D −0.9
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

6.8% withdrew · 7 of 103 enrolled.

Colleen G Campbell 25 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
56.0% A
32.0% B
8.0% C
0.0% D
4.0% F

25 letter grades

Compare with the course
Campbell vs. the course average
A +12.1
B −5.7
C −4.5
D −3.0
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

7.4% withdrew · 2 of 27 enrolled.

Jody L Jahn 1,027 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
54.5% A
26.9% B
11.5% C
3.5% D
3.6% F

1,027 letter grades

Compare with the course
Jahn vs. the course average
A +10.6
B −10.8
C −1.0
D +0.5
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.9% withdrew · 9 of 1,036 enrolled.

Ruth Lynne Hickerson 1,230 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
31.9% A
49.0% B
13.7% C
2.8% D
2.6% F

1,230 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hickerson vs. the course average
A −12.0
B +11.3
C +1.2
D −0.2
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 33 of 1,263 enrolled.

Angie White Davlyn 26 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
23.1% A
53.8% B
15.4% C
3.8% D
3.8% F

26 letter grades

Compare with the course
Davlyn vs. the course average
A −20.8
B +16.2
C +2.9
D +0.8
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.

Tajshen Geneva Campbell 49 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
28.6% A
36.7% B
28.6% C
0.0% D
6.1% F

49 letter grades

Compare with the course
Campbell vs. the course average
A −15.3
B −0.9
C +16.1
D −3.0
F +3.2

Difference in percentage points.

5.8% withdrew · 3 of 52 enrolled.

Ava Mamary 3 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Bailey Troutman 60 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.84
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.68
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.68
Questions4.83
Chelsea Magyar 30 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.86
Technology4.48
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.02
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.90
Reflection3.98
Respect4.24
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.68
Questions4.15
Michelle Rossi 14 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.75
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.70
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Emily Battaglia 12 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.20
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.65
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.15
Questions4.65
Macy Conant 43 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.66
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.68
Reflection4.64
Respect4.82
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.57
Questions4.77
Kathryn Leslie 10 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Mushfique Wadud 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.75
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Angela White Davlyn 8 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Brandon Daniels 4 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Brittany Mae Hamilton 57 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.66
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.58
Reflection4.53
Respect4.55
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.44
Questions4.44
Dustin J Martinez 37 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.79
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.54
Questions4.80
Salwa Kazi 46 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.36
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.16
Reflection4.19
Respect4.70
Creativity3.79
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Laine Zizka 58 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.62
Reflection4.99
Respect4.63
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.75
Questions4.53
Anna Colleen Turner 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.65
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Sunday De Los Santos 27 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.77
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.59
Reflection4.83
Respect4.81
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.66
Questions4.56
Yukai Chen 27 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.64
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.26
Reflection4.64
Respect4.67
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.28
Questions4.27
Reily Mcgee 26 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.82
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.83
Reflection4.61
Respect4.87
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.64
Questions4.93
Jayne Mallory Simpson 12 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.08
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity4.18
Grading3.96
Reflection3.80
Respect3.46
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.18
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.05
Questions4.14
Gabriel Vanhorssen 18 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.55
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.05
Reflection4.40
Respect4.55
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Jayla Harding 31 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.88
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.67
Reflection4.84
Respect4.88
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.72
Questions4.76
Joseph Lee 31 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.74
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.33
Reflection4.63
Respect4.89
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.83
Hannah Luz 25 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.16
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.74
Reflection4.02
Respect4.12
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.18
Challenge3.61
Questions4.01
Yitong Ma 23 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.48
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.03
Reflection4.32
Respect4.66
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.38
Questions4.26
Evans Agyapong 46 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.87
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.34
Reflection4.81
Respect4.92
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.77
Questions4.52
Sean Kenney 17 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.44
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.98
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.98
Reflection4.98
Respect4.77
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.44
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.75
David Boromisza-Habashi 156 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

156 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.78
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.63
Reflection4.58
Respect4.82
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.60
Questions4.58
Winifred Sekyibea Abakah 20 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.02
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.69
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.18
Reflection4.09
Respect4.44
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.39
Questions4.39
Mel Hanby 56 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.87
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.66
Reflection4.86
Respect4.94
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.86
Vera Smith 38 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.70
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.65
Reflection4.74
Respect4.80
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.58
Questions4.75
Fariha Islam 93 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

93 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.01
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.04
Reflection4.24
Respect4.46
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.57
Challenge3.93
Questions4.11
Jone Laura Brunelle 6 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.95
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.12
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.43
Interaction3.46
Challenge4.95
Questions4.82
Cara Wilson 16 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.65
Reflection4.10
Respect3.70
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.75
Questions3.90
Sydney Frigerio 60 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

60 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.93
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.77
Reflection4.83
Respect4.92
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.78
Questions4.84
Alison Friedrich 51 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.89
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.78
Reflection4.84
Respect4.89
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.77
Questions4.89
Heidi Judd 58 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.69
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.54
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.54
Questions4.74
Sindhu Nepolean 41 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.56
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.22
Reflection4.37
Respect4.67
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.21
Questions4.55
Dani Soibelman 10 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.95
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.91
Respect4.75
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.71
Challenge5.00
Questions4.95
Michelle Brown 3 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.