Course record COEN

COEN 1500

CEAS First Year Seminar

University of Colorado Boulder

432 grades62 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed record

Professors 62 of 62

Christopher Warren Miller 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.97GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

4.2% withdrew · 1 of 24 enrolled.

Maura Darcy Hollister 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.91GPA
95.8% A
4.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Sarah Broadhurst 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
95.7% A
0.0% B
4.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.

Karen Marie Crofton 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
95.8% A
0.0% B
4.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Rebecca Flitton Ciancanelli 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
87.5% A
12.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Isabella Colosimo 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
91.3% A
8.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.

Denee Allison Janda 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
87.0% A
8.7% B
0.0% C
4.3% D
0.0% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.

Erica Schomer 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
87.5% A
8.3% B
0.0% C
4.2% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Chantal Baca 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.73GPA
93.8% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
6.3% F

16 letter grades · Limited sample

5.9% withdrew · 1 of 17 enrolled.

Meagan A Goulian 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.71GPA
83.3% A
8.3% B
4.2% C
4.2% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Alexandra Voorhees 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.68GPA
79.2% A
12.5% B
8.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Danielle Edwards 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.68GPA
91.3% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
4.3% D
4.3% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

4.2% withdrew · 1 of 24 enrolled.

Amber Cardamone 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
91.3% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
8.7% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.

Anna Eagan 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.63GPA
79.2% A
12.5% B
8.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Kathleen Seppala 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.61GPA
83.3% A
5.6% B
5.6% C
0.0% D
5.6% F

18 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.

Kevin Arlington Lobdell 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.60GPA
85.7% A
0.0% B
4.8% C
9.5% D
0.0% F

21 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.

Jennifer Smoot 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.58GPA
78.3% A
13.0% B
4.3% C
0.0% D
4.3% F

23 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.

Kira E Hachtel 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.37GPA
75.0% A
8.3% B
4.2% C
8.3% D
4.2% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Laura E Bonney 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.36GPA
54.2% A
33.3% B
8.3% C
0.0% D
4.2% F

24 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.

Charles Eagan 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Rebecca Anne Ciancanelli 13 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Meagan Alice Larsen 5 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection3.60
Respect4.30
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Rajagopalan Balaji 3 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Erik Lewis Hodges 2 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Lisa Malkanthi De Alwis 43 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.43
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.27
Grading3.73
Reflection4.50
Respect4.57
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.50
Questions4.67
H C F Fredricksmeyer 40 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.65
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Julie Elizabeth Steinbrenner 4 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Scot Ray Douglass 6 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.90
Questions4.50
Anja K. Lange 3 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Albin J. Gasiewski 5 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Murray William Cox 4 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Stephen M Kissler 3 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Rafael M Frongillo 6 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Ben Livneh 11 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Marco M Nicotra 4 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Wilson Smith 3 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alfonso Gonzalo Bastias 2 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.00
Jay Hoberg Arehart 2 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Nicole Jeanne Labbe 51 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.67
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.70
Questions4.83
Bill Wright 5 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Kurt Karl Maute 4 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Rhonda Olcott Hoenigman 2 reported responses 3.15Eval / 5
Overall3.15 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading1.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
John A Evans 31 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.37
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.87
Reflection4.63
Respect4.77
Creativity4.57
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Andrea Kowalchuk 35 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.35
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Keith Robert Molenaar 13 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
James Steven Byrne 12 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Peter Edward Hamlington 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.77
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.93
Respect4.83
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Sarah Stanford-Mcintyre 7 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.90
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.15
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.40
Allison Paige Anderson Hayman 45 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.60
Reflection4.57
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.43
Questions4.73
Aditi S Bhaskar 28 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.27
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.17
Reflection4.40
Respect4.83
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.67
Willem A Schreuder 6 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.15
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.70
Malinda Schaefer Zarske 16 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Wendy Mores Young 8 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kathryn O'Harra 2 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.50
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Bri-Mathias Hodge 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Britta Bergstrom 14 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Danna Gurari 16 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Erin Dewese 2 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Chantal Iribagiza 10 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Joel E. Swanson 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Denis Macharia Muthike 3 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Jennifer G Scheib 10 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.