Course record CMDP
CMDP 2100
Approaches to Historical Media Practices
University of Colorado Boulder
1,067 grades23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Maria Luiza Parvu 29 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parvu vs. the course average
A
+34.5
B
−18.7
C
−9.7
D
−2.6
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
James Francis Supanick 234 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
234 letter grades
Compare with the course
Supanick vs. the course average
A
+1.7
B
−0.4
C
−0.7
D
+0.8
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 9 of 243 enrolled.
Overall3.66 / 5
235 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.62
Technology3.71
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration2.56
Connection3.55
Contribution3.15
Discussion3.63
Inclusivity4.03
Grading3.70
Reflection3.64
Respect4.28
Creativity3.81
Feedback3.27
Interaction3.68
Challenge3.77
Questions3.85
Andrew P Young 157 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
157 letter grades
Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A
−10.7
B
+15.7
C
−3.9
D
−0.7
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 159 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.40
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
August John Black 629 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
629 letter grades
Compare with the course
Black vs. the course average
A
−0.1
B
−2.3
C
+1.8
D
+0.1
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 16 of 645 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
238 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.11
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.17
Reflection4.17
Respect4.64
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.18
Questions4.26
Travis Austin 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.24GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.14 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.58
Technology4.25
Synthesis2.97
Collaboration2.02
Connection3.31
Contribution3.02
Discussion3.29
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.44
Reflection3.22
Respect3.98
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.46
Interaction3.42
Challenge3.39
Questions3.78
Nima Bahrehmand 9 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.15
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.05
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.90
Questions4.15
Emma C Piper-Burket 14 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.22
Connection4.23
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.34
Reflection4.42
Respect4.73
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.43
Questions4.17
Minso Kim 26 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.07
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.60
Reflection4.48
Respect4.72
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.46
Questions4.67
Paulus Emil Horvath Van Horne 99 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.56
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.71
Reflection4.63
Respect4.84
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.62
Questions4.60
Bentley Brown 7 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.25
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.75
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Toma Serban Peiu 26 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.94
Reflection4.88
Respect4.87
Creativity4.81
Feedback3.34
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.52
Questions3.40
Renata Carvalho Barreto 11 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.34
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration1.60
Connection3.68
Contribution3.78
Discussion3.39
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.49
Reflection3.97
Respect5.00
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.49
Questions4.13
Laurids Andersen Sonne 13 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.55
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.55
Roberto Samuel Maria Azaretto 10 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Naharin Shech 30 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.47
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.53
Reflection4.37
Respect5.00
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.59
Questions4.90
Eric Barry Drasin 41 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.13
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.12
Connection3.78
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity4.45
Grading3.96
Reflection4.10
Respect4.39
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.27
Interaction3.89
Challenge4.28
Questions4.21
Kimberley Bianca Warren 19 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.20
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.05
Reflection3.80
Respect4.35
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.65
Questions4.20
Brook Vann 79 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.32
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.74
Reflection4.33
Respect4.76
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.42
Questions4.74
Kimberley Bianca Hettinger 19 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.20
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.45
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.25
Questions4.55
Jean Jacques Martinod 10 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Tyler Grimes 20 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.40
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.69
Reflection4.55
Respect4.71
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.72
Questions4.71
Jer<F3>Nimo Reyes Retana 81 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Anshul Roy 2 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.