Course record CMDP

CMDP 1400

Introduction to Critical Media Practices

University of Colorado Boulder

1,206 grades25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score31/100
Below average

Professors 25 of 25

Eric David Coombs Esmail 130 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
58.5% A
26.2% B
9.2% C
3.8% D
2.3% F

130 letter grades

Compare with the course
Esmail vs. the course average
A +2.0
B −0.5
C −0.4
D +1.3
F −2.4

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 4 of 134 enrolled.

Andrew P Young 1,076 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
56.2% A
26.7% B
9.7% C
2.4% D
5.0% F

1,076 letter grades

Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A −0.2
B +0.1
C same
D −0.2
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 31 of 1,107 enrolled.

Joseph Douglas Steele 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.05
Questions4.35
Renata Carvalho Barreto 16 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.35
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.05
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.40
Questions4.55
Naharin Shech 70 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

70 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.55
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.78
Reflection4.68
Respect4.83
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.68
Questions4.84
Travis Austin 56 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.51
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.60
Reflection4.13
Respect4.71
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.31
Questions4.83
Keith Haynes 45 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Kevin James Sweet 14 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.95
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Eliseo Ortiz 17 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.31
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.21
Reflection4.48
Respect4.67
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.18
Questions4.78
Paulus Emil Horvath Van Horne 58 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.38
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.41
Reflection4.53
Respect4.70
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.43
Questions4.54
Roberto Samuel Maria Azaretto 17 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.80
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.45
Reflection4.15
Respect4.65
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.00
Questions4.65
Justin Keith Trupiano 4 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration2.85
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.15
Gabe Allen 36 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.22
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.58
Reflection4.62
Respect4.70
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.13
Questions4.60
Emma C Piper-Burket 42 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.29
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.85
Reflection4.63
Respect4.91
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.78
Questions4.96
Elise Ertl 14 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Eric Barry Drasin 18 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.67
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.76
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.72
Questions4.58
Jeronimo Reyes Retana 21 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.55
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.35
David Dotse 18 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.55
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.20
Reflection4.63
Respect4.85
Creativity4.95
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.53
Questions4.57
Mushfique Wadud 20 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology3.56
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration2.73
Connection4.42
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.42
Grading3.49
Reflection4.26
Respect4.63
Creativity3.96
Feedback3.34
Interaction4.52
Challenge3.80
Questions3.75
Viola Arduini 15 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration3.31
Connection4.17
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.86
Reflection4.54
Respect4.78
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.22
Questions4.34
Sharifa Moore 50 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.44
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.63
Reflection4.72
Respect4.84
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.66
Questions4.63
Brook Vann 5 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Juan L Velazquez 16 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.28
Connection3.21
Contribution3.68
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.44
Grading3.64
Reflection3.66
Respect4.42
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.06
Questions3.77
Anshul Roy 15 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.22
Connection4.32
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.18
Reflection4.20
Respect4.49
Creativity4.41
Feedback3.97
Interaction3.68
Challenge3.99
Questions4.15
Srikar Hari 16 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.17
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.37
Reflection4.27
Respect4.71
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.38
Questions4.40
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.