Course record CMCI

CMCI 1040

Foundational Concepts and Creativity in Media, Communication and Information

University of Colorado Boulder

1,009 grades32 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 32 of 32

Cassandra Dana 68 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
66.2% A
25.0% B
4.4% C
2.9% D
1.5% F

68 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dana vs. the course average
A +4.8
B −1.5
C −4.7
D +1.9
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 68 enrolled.

Samira Rajabi 550 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
62.5% A
26.7% B
8.2% C
1.1% D
1.5% F

550 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rajabi vs. the course average
A +1.2
B +0.3
C −0.9
D same
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 14 of 564 enrolled.

John Richard Stevens 258 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
57.4% A
29.5% B
10.9% C
0.8% D
1.6% F

258 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stevens vs. the course average
A −4.0
B +3.0
C +1.7
D −0.3
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

1.5% withdrew · 4 of 262 enrolled.

Shaylynn Lynch Lesinski 133 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
61.7% A
20.3% B
12.0% C
0.8% D
5.3% F

133 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lesinski vs. the course average
A +0.3
B −6.2
C +2.9
D −0.3
F +3.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 3 of 136 enrolled.

Kevin James Sweet 28 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.35
Reflection4.67
Respect4.95
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Sima R Bhowmik 9 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.75
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.70
Reflection3.60
Respect4.30
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.90
Questions4.50
Dina Dorari 38 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology3.92
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.09
Contribution3.81
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.62
Reflection3.67
Respect4.30
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.60
Questions3.65
Eric Barry Drasin 10 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.65
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Toma Serban Peiu 50 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.53
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.32
Reflection4.40
Respect4.77
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.63
Biyi Wen 13 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology2.93
Synthesis3.33
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.50
Contribution3.93
Discussion3.33
Inclusivity3.97
Grading3.23
Reflection3.33
Respect4.50
Creativity3.23
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.03
Challenge3.90
Questions3.10
Anat Leshnick 6 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.25
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.75
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.25
Questions4.90
Keren-Happuch Odinenu 19 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.55
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity4.05
Grading3.80
Reflection3.65
Respect4.25
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.35
Questions3.50
Autumn Tyler 10 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Muhammad Ali 16 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection3.90
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.45
Darija Medic 19 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.45
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.85
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Debora Correa De Castro E Martini 14 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.45
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Charlie Dana 22 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.00
Reflection3.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.60
Questions4.30
Sunday De Los Santos 15 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.02
Contribution3.58
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.78
Reflection3.80
Respect4.63
Creativity4.46
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.09
Questions3.54
Julia Dean 18 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.85
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jeronimo Reyes Retana 19 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.40
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Ian Hatcher 13 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.25
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.35
Reflection3.95
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.25
Questions4.80
Hibah Ahmad 13 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.45
Wen Lei 22 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.42
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.25
Reflection4.00
Respect4.71
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.97
Questions4.46
Nihal Alaqabawy 9 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.65
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection3.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.30
Questions4.40
Saima A Kazmi 8 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.00
Respect4.35
Creativity4.65
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.35
Delaney Torrisi 12 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Cara Wilson 12 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology2.85
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.25
Contribution3.85
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.35
Reflection3.50
Respect4.10
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.55
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Tyler Grimes 15 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.60
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.55
Grading5.00
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Qiongye Chen 24 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.90
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.05
Reflection3.95
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.25
Questions4.55
Rajatava Karmaker 19 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.50
Contribution3.65
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.05
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.45
Questions4.20
Ershad Khan 17 reported responses 2.77Eval / 5
Overall2.77 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology2.70
Synthesis2.65
Collaboration2.95
Connection2.65
Contribution3.15
Discussion2.85
Inclusivity3.05
Grading2.30
Reflection2.70
Respect3.50
Creativity3.10
Feedback2.45
Interaction3.35
Challenge2.45
Questions2.60
Cassie Sherwood 18 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.10
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.55
Reflection4.05
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.