Course record CLAS

CLAS 3119

The Archaeology of Death

University of Colorado Boulder

713 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record

Professors 17 of 17

Travis Rick Rupp 263 grades · 1 term 3.66GPA
79.5% A
13.7% B
4.2% C
1.1% D
1.5% F

263 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rupp vs. the course average
A +22.2
B −17.3
C −4.2
D −0.3
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

4.0% withdrew · 11 of 274 enrolled.

Sarah Anne James 385 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
46.0% A
41.0% B
9.4% C
1.6% D
2.1% F

385 letter grades

Compare with the course
James vs. the course average
A −11.2
B +10.0
C +0.9
D +0.2
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 14 of 399 enrolled.

Erin Leigh Baxter 65 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
33.8% A
41.5% B
20.0% C
1.5% D
3.1% F

65 letter grades

Compare with the course
Baxter vs. the course average
A −23.4
B +10.5
C +11.6
D +0.1
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

5.8% withdrew · 4 of 69 enrolled.

Catherine Claire Goode 9 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.05
Reflection4.45
Respect4.65
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.45
Hannah Madeline Slough 11 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Kate Goode 7 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.75
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.45
Grading3.95
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.95
Questions3.60
Andrew Rivadeneira 17 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.60
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.70
Reflection4.62
Respect4.68
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.72
Questions4.67
Elise Ramsey 8 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.15
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.55
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Cassie Winkley 6 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Tanner Frick 9 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.25
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.85
Autumn Greene 9 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.25
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Claire Hook 5 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.65
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
James Chanfrau 4 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.35
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Tauriel Zhang 5 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Emma Malinasky 1 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Adam Maggiore 3 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution3.25
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.25
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Najely Tridas May 3 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.