Course record CLAS
CLAS 1140
Bread and Circuses: Society and Culture in the Roman World
University of Colorado Boulder
931 grades23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Samuel Louis Kindick 53 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kindick vs. the course average
A
+19.6
B
−15.9
C
−4.9
D
+5.7
F
−4.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 3 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Tyler Andrew Denton 180 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
180 letter grades
Compare with the course
Denton vs. the course average
A
+1.1
B
−4.2
C
+3.5
D
+0.1
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 10 of 190 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.93
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.43
Reflection4.26
Respect4.59
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.39
Questions4.70
Andrew J Cain 698 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
698 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cain vs. the course average
A
−1.8
B
+2.3
C
−0.5
D
−0.5
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 23 of 721 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
271 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.64
Reflection4.35
Respect4.84
Creativity4.36
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.38
Questions4.75
Kelly Grogan 15 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Jacob B Lambert 26 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.37
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.57
Reflection4.67
Respect4.64
Creativity4.71
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.27
Questions4.52
William Seth Frost 13 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.65
Synthesis2.95
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.80
Reflection3.70
Respect4.50
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.65
Questions4.20
Emma Ann Halverson 27 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.90
Reflection4.85
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Jacob Bennett Horton 18 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.20
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.60
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.45
Questions4.60
Hannah Elizabeth Hungerford 30 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.95
Elise Ramsey 40 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.52
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.83
Reflection4.75
Respect4.66
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.68
Questions4.97
Rowan Frost 8 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Matthew Coy 11 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.25
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.95
Eli Kessler 17 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.85
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.95
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.40
Questions4.20
Isabel Koster 50 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.10
Questions4.80
Ali Macey 7 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Julia Bowers 8 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.50
Reflection4.15
Respect4.90
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.90
Questions5.00
Frances Harrington 12 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.90
Reflection3.95
Respect4.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.60
Questions4.25
Jordan Ardoin 18 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.75
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Zachary Herz 138 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.23
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.50
Reflection4.43
Respect4.83
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.47
Questions4.77
Adam Maggiore 22 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.95
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Emily Saladino 31 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.45
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Leila Shahidi 21 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Najely Tridas May 12 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.85
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.15
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.