Course record CLAS
CLAS 1100
Greek and Roman Mythology
University of Colorado Boulder
1,204 grades25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average
Samuel Louis Kindick 136 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
136 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kindick vs. the course average
A
+15.2
B
−5.0
C
−2.8
D
−2.8
F
−4.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 2 of 138 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.52
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.80
Reflection4.74
Respect4.83
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.77
Questions4.88
Laurialan Blake Reitzammer 204 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
204 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reitzammer vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−2.8
C
−4.3
D
−1.3
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 3 of 207 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
267 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.14
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.72
Reflection4.68
Respect4.84
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.66
Questions4.71
Edwin Tyler Lansford 48 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
48 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lansford vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
−7.0
C
+5.0
D
−0.1
F
−5.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 2 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Reina E Callier 90 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
90 letter grades
Compare with the course
Callier vs. the course average
A
+10.1
B
−10.0
C
+0.6
D
+0.2
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 6 of 96 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.67
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.36
Grading5.00
Reflection4.89
Respect5.00
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.68
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.89
Questions5.00
Dimitri Nakassis 365 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
365 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nakassis vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+7.5
C
−0.7
D
−1.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 20 of 385 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.75
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.45
Reflection4.45
Respect4.60
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
John C Gibert 217 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
217 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gibert vs. the course average
A
−8.1
B
−0.2
C
+0.4
D
+1.8
F
+6.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 15 of 232 enrolled.
Overall3.90 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.16
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.74
Connection3.80
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.43
Reflection4.29
Respect4.78
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.83
Challenge4.56
Questions4.69
Tyler Andrew Denton 113 grades · 1 term 2.78GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Denton vs. the course average
A
−16.5
B
+0.5
C
+10.5
D
+5.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 5 of 118 enrolled.
Overall4.00 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Travis Rick Rupp 31 grades · 1 term 2.43GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rupp vs. the course average
A
−9.1
B
−8.5
C
−2.0
D
+2.2
F
+17.3
Difference in percentage points.
8.8% withdrew · 3 of 34 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration2.51
Connection3.83
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.32
Reflection4.03
Respect4.42
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.12
Challenge4.32
Questions4.51
Hannah Madeline Slough 38 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Kelly Grogan 41 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
William Seth Frost 42 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.42
Connection3.60
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.20
Reflection4.46
Respect4.72
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.29
Questions4.45
Rachael Grimes 34 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.24
Connection3.60
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.22
Reflection4.57
Respect4.79
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.25
Questions4.60
Janan V Perkins 20 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.25
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Cassandra Winkley 12 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.75
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.45
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Tyler Lansford 49 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.06
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.80
Reflection4.74
Respect4.95
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Abby Neyhart Martin 18 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.85
Danise Wu 11 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Daniel Wisniewski 13 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.95
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Eli Kessler 17 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.10
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Rowan Frost 20 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.25
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.05
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.40
Questions4.25
Jordan Ardoin 15 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.40
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.85
Emily Saladino 19 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.55
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.55
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Acacia Oyler 24 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.68
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.80
Reflection4.73
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.63
Questions4.78
Yvona K Trnka-Amrhein 12 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Hejing Zhang 7 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.90
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.05
Respect3.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.45
Questions4.55
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.