Course record CHIN
CHIN 1020
Beginning Chinese 2
University of Colorado Boulder
223 grades21 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record
Jin Chen 45 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
45 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
+3.9
B
+0.2
C
−1.0
D
+0.4
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 3 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.80
Reflection4.83
Respect4.97
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Yingjie Li 96 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
96 letter grades
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
−3.4
B
+0.8
C
+3.8
D
+0.3
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 5 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.50
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.80
Reflection4.68
Respect4.91
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.91
Questions4.91
Yu Zhang 32 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A
+6.0
B
−5.5
C
−4.5
D
+1.3
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 1 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.87 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.65
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.94
Reflection4.75
Respect4.92
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.92
Questions4.95
Chun-Ling Hsu 50 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
+1.8
C
−3.6
D
−1.8
F
+4.4
Difference in percentage points.
7.4% withdrew · 4 of 54 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.03
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.37
Reflection4.63
Respect4.63
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.77
Questions4.80
Jiaqi Wang 9 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Huizhi Wang 3 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Huiyao Yang 6 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Runqing Qi 36 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.77
Reflection4.83
Respect4.87
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.90
Questions4.93
Camille Kathleen Byrne 37 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.40
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.77
Reflection4.63
Respect4.87
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.73
Questions4.80
Yaqi Gao 80 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.62
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.74
Reflection4.73
Respect4.83
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.54
Questions4.80
Yanan Xiang 34 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.43
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.73
Reflection4.63
Respect4.93
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.87
Federico Beltrame 60 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.67
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.82
Reflection4.77
Respect4.85
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.81
Questions4.88
Yue Liu 15 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.80
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.77
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.67
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.97
Luna Shang 15 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.80
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.63
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.93
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Ke Wu 15 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.80
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.73
Reflection4.90
Respect4.93
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.73
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.83
Jiayi Peng 44 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.60
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.77
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.80
Questions4.87
Zoushiyu Zhou 42 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.70
Reflection4.73
Respect4.83
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.67
Questions4.83
Xianming Qin 32 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.53
Reflection4.83
Respect4.77
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.87
Jingyun Song 32 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.63
Reflection4.83
Respect4.87
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.83
Huiyu Tan 32 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.60
Reflection4.83
Respect4.73
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Yetong Yang 32 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.43
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.67
Reflection4.83
Respect4.83
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.70
Questions4.93
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.