Course record CHEM
CHEM 4591
Physical Chemistry Lab 2
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score68/100
StrongDaniel J Katz 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Feedback5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Aroob Abdelhamid 1 reported responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction1.00
Questions4.00
Andrew Chomas 19 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.39
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.53
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.50
Questions4.71
Aman Kumar Agrawal 8 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.18
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity2.30
Grading4.96
Reflection4.59
Respect5.00
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.93
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.44
Questions5.00
Jingyi Wu 5 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alina Margarita Mateo 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Srijan Bhattacharyya 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Lane Marie Terry 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Angelina Lisa Leonardi 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Heinrich Johannes Salzmann 1 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Roberto Cardenas 8 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.73
Reflection4.80
Respect4.17
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.07
Challenge4.53
Questions5.00
Kyle Tyner 8 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.74
Connection3.53
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity2.31
Grading5.00
Reflection4.34
Respect5.00
Creativity4.74
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.66
Questions5.00
Shannon Ganley 5 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.84
Contribution4.84
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.84
Reflection4.84
Respect4.84
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.84
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.92
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.