Course record CHEM

CHEM 4181

Instrumental Analysis - Lecture and Laboratory 2

University of Colorado Boulder

149 grades23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score75/100
Strong

Professors 23 of 23

Jozef Antonius De Gouw 116 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
78.4% A
19.0% B
2.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

116 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gouw vs. the course average
A +5.3
B −5.9
C +0.6
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 116 enrolled.

Susan Marie Hendrickson 33 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
54.5% A
45.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hendrickson vs. the course average
A −18.6
B +20.6
C −2.0
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 1 of 34 enrolled.

James Spencer Stewart 15 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Alexander Clayton Bradley 11 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.54
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.80
Reflection4.64
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Andrew Jensen 11 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.54
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.80
Reflection4.64
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Daniel J Katz 11 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.54
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.60
Reflection4.64
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Zachary Ross Schiffman 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Hanalei Rose Chinitz Lewine 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Emmaline Reed Longnecker 6 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lindsey Davis Anderson 8 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Molly Larsen 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Zach Schiffman 23 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Kevin Jansen 7 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Madison Rutherford 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Guy Symonds 11 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.41
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.81
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.41
Questions4.42
Nathan Sweet 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Max Lee 5 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.98
Grading5.00
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rebecca Mesburis 8 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Romulo Cruz Simbron 10 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.20
Heinrich Johannes Salzmann 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Will Dresser 5 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Andre Schaum 3 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Valentina Osorio 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.