Course record CHEM
CHEM 3341
Laboratory in Organic Chemistry 2
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable56 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Quinn Brink 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Questions5.00
Lacey Jane Wayment 32 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.16
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration3.49
Connection3.57
Contribution3.61
Discussion3.78
Inclusivity3.53
Grading3.85
Reflection3.65
Respect4.37
Creativity3.49
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.10
Questions4.26
Shaofeng Huang 14 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.28
Connection3.61
Contribution3.11
Discussion3.77
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.90
Reflection3.97
Respect4.78
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.37
Questions4.12
Hongxuan Chen 36 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration3.64
Connection3.74
Contribution3.83
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.44
Reflection4.21
Respect4.70
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.34
Questions4.64
Shea Osullivan 51 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.21
Contribution3.59
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity2.60
Grading4.32
Reflection4.06
Respect4.52
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.95
Interaction3.76
Challenge4.32
Questions3.86
Zepeng Lei 30 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration2.86
Connection3.78
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity3.49
Grading3.70
Reflection3.77
Respect4.37
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.24
Interaction3.91
Challenge3.70
Questions3.46
Wyatt Powell 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Brianna Lu Callahan 15 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration2.87
Connection3.93
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.38
Grading4.93
Reflection4.76
Respect4.43
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.61
Questions5.00
Claire E Boronski 36 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.66
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.64
Reflection4.84
Respect4.88
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.66
Questions4.95
Brandon Aaron Bishop 19 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.31
Technology3.99
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.49
Contribution3.69
Discussion3.01
Inclusivity3.97
Grading2.71
Reflection4.68
Respect2.53
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.29
Interaction3.99
Challenge4.69
Questions3.31
Keira Elizabeth Culley 11 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.93
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.93
Connection3.77
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.93
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.87
Questions4.83
Ruiheng Jing 20 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.38
Contribution4.28
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.28
Grading4.95
Reflection4.94
Respect4.98
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.98
Questions4.94
Scott B Brody 6 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.20
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.20
Tessa Hamilton Trexler Myren 17 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.93
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.28
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.33
Questions4.90
Micah Ohlhausen 5 reported responses 2.28Eval / 5
Overall2.28 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.30
Technology2.40
Synthesis2.30
Collaboration1.30
Connection1.50
Contribution1.60
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity1.70
Grading2.00
Reflection2.40
Respect3.30
Creativity2.30
Feedback2.40
Interaction2.40
Challenge2.20
Questions3.40
Somnath Dutta 11 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.21
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.51
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.21
Matthew Scott Mccoy 4 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Michael Joseph Stodolka 4 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Cassandra Marisa Sanchez 15 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Chenwei Lu 9 reported responses 3.34Eval / 5
Overall3.34 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology2.65
Synthesis2.75
Collaboration3.35
Connection1.65
Contribution2.25
Discussion3.15
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.45
Reflection3.65
Respect4.30
Creativity2.40
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.15
Questions3.50
Hoai Tieu Bao Pham 15 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.87
Reflection4.63
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Austin Dean Bargmann 79 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.32
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.70
Reflection4.61
Respect4.95
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.79
Questions4.89
Timothy Maxwell Davis 17 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.40
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.53
Reflection4.60
Respect4.93
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.73
Questions4.63
Alan Joseph Trudeau Munoz 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
James D Greenwood 30 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.18
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.17
Grading3.93
Reflection4.12
Respect4.26
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.14
Questions3.85
Brianna Irene Check 4 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.20
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions4.80
Tim Davis 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.48
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.31
Reflection4.69
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.79
Questions4.80
Mike Stodolka 7 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.60
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.70
Reflection3.90
Respect3.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.70
Questions4.00
Kyle Fisch 35 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.70
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.66
Reflection4.64
Respect4.76
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.79
Questions4.76
Garrett Evenson 6 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity1.80
Grading3.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Charlie Lu 22 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology3.21
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration4.48
Connection3.40
Contribution3.89
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.93
Reflection3.69
Respect4.67
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.30
Questions4.03
Mia Muse 13 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.45
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.95
Reflection4.88
Respect4.92
Creativity4.53
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.88
Questions5.00
Zirui Wang 26 reported responses 3.23Eval / 5
Overall3.23 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology3.58
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.27
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.44
Inclusivity2.29
Grading3.73
Reflection3.68
Respect3.80
Creativity2.75
Feedback3.28
Interaction4.43
Challenge2.93
Questions3.19
Alec Kolodziejczyk 38 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.36
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.81
Grading3.96
Reflection4.44
Respect4.78
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.43
Questions4.37
Abby Rawlings 44 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.61
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.26
Grading3.82
Reflection4.16
Respect4.73
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.77
Questions4.53
Max Abreu 26 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.57
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.62
Reflection4.87
Respect5.00
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.82
Questions4.97
Lukas Gardner 14 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.93
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.02
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.32
Reflection4.12
Respect4.68
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.88
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.93
Dyuti Chakraborty 6 reported responses 3.45Eval / 5
Overall3.45 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.75
Contribution3.40
Discussion2.75
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.50
Respect3.40
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.85
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.40
Questions3.35
Cameron Howard Lee 9 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Alex Laveck 18 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.47
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.73
Reflection4.59
Respect4.70
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.41
Questions4.40
Andrew Chomas 2 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution2.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Tania Shahvali 39 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.23
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.63
Reflection4.67
Respect4.83
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Hunter Koltunski 10 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.62
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.27
Contribution3.46
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity3.68
Grading3.00
Reflection3.49
Respect4.05
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.46
Questions3.18
Antawn Gonzalez 27 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.26
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.80
Reflection4.51
Respect4.67
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.69
Questions4.66
Jade Fullerton 36 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.29
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.52
Reflection4.71
Respect4.83
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.87
Questions4.87
Zachary Gekow 27 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.44
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.53
Reflection4.74
Respect5.00
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.94
Questions4.77
Lily Goulding 15 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.12
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.26
Reflection4.28
Respect5.00
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.84
Questions4.69
Qiucheng Xu 2 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Zihao Yue 9 reported responses 3.17Eval / 5
Overall3.17 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.10
Contribution2.60
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.90
Reflection3.40
Respect3.90
Creativity2.60
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.60
Questions2.90
Cat Avarvarei 12 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.15
Reflection4.20
Respect4.75
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Ashley Ley 6 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.88
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.47
Reflection4.47
Respect4.77
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Kenneth Pauley 6 reported responses 3.00Eval / 5
Overall3.00 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.30
Contribution2.50
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.30
Grading2.50
Reflection3.30
Respect3.00
Creativity2.20
Feedback2.20
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Himanshu Gautam 6 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection3.60
Respect4.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.10
Questions4.60
Ki Finch 5 reported responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.80
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.80
Reflection3.60
Respect3.80
Creativity2.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
William Vavrichek 4 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.20
Reflection3.80
Respect3.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Jared Martin 1 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.