Course record CHEM
CHEM 3321
Laboratory in Organic Chemistry 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable88 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score32/100
Below average
Maciej Andrzej Walczak 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Connection5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Alan Joseph Trudeau Munoz 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kamil Marsalek 8 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.80
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.00
Reflection3.60
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.90
Questions2.90
Brandon Aaron Bishop 17 reported responses 2.51Eval / 5
Overall2.51 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology2.63
Synthesis1.93
Collaboration1.38
Connection1.95
Contribution1.73
Discussion2.36
Inclusivity1.28
Grading1.84
Reflection2.49
Respect2.52
Creativity1.60
Feedback1.98
Interaction2.17
Challenge2.23
Questions2.84
Claire E Boronski 23 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology3.69
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.67
Contribution3.42
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity2.85
Grading3.71
Reflection4.08
Respect4.36
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.58
Questions4.02
Shea Osullivan 5 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions3.20
Madeline Walden 48 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.10
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.18
Reflection4.21
Respect4.88
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.56
Questions4.43
Tessa Hamilton Trexler Myren 22 reported responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.33
Technology3.33
Synthesis3.13
Collaboration2.07
Connection2.93
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.33
Grading3.57
Reflection3.17
Respect4.10
Creativity3.27
Feedback3.03
Interaction3.53
Challenge3.13
Questions3.13
Micah Ohlhausen 6 reported responses 3.02Eval / 5
Overall3.02 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration2.00
Connection2.80
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.30
Grading2.80
Reflection3.00
Respect3.30
Creativity2.50
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.50
Questions3.20
Keira Elizabeth Culley 38 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.79
Connection3.86
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.27
Reflection4.48
Respect4.44
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.61
Questions4.87
Hoai Tieu Bao Pham 24 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.69
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration1.91
Connection4.06
Contribution2.41
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity2.86
Grading4.29
Reflection3.86
Respect4.48
Creativity3.43
Feedback3.65
Interaction2.42
Challenge3.61
Questions4.13
Phuc Hoang Pham 46 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.17
Connection3.89
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.03
Grading4.63
Reflection4.45
Respect4.59
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.44
Questions4.63
Scott B Brody 22 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology2.55
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.76
Connection3.53
Contribution3.61
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity2.66
Grading2.11
Reflection3.85
Respect4.81
Creativity3.66
Feedback1.78
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.91
Questions2.30
Ruiheng Jing 25 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.16
Synthesis3.11
Collaboration4.59
Connection3.73
Contribution3.23
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.81
Reflection4.59
Respect4.69
Creativity3.84
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.21
Questions4.41
Brendan Alexander Langmack 81 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.53
Connection3.16
Contribution3.58
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity3.06
Grading3.47
Reflection3.71
Respect4.21
Creativity3.54
Feedback3.28
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.79
Questions3.71
Garrett Evenson 5 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity1.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Zepeng Lei 6 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology2.31
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration3.50
Connection1.58
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.01
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.07
Respect4.23
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.23
Challenge5.00
Questions4.62
Rachel Weintraub 21 reported responses 2.71Eval / 5
Overall2.71 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.11
Technology3.23
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration1.88
Connection1.73
Contribution2.42
Discussion2.25
Inclusivity1.94
Grading2.87
Reflection2.84
Respect2.83
Creativity2.27
Feedback2.46
Interaction2.97
Challenge2.49
Questions1.71
Yiming Hu 21 reported responses 3.04Eval / 5
Overall3.04 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.23
Connection3.67
Contribution2.77
Discussion3.33
Inclusivity3.07
Grading2.37
Reflection3.27
Respect4.30
Creativity3.67
Feedback1.70
Interaction3.93
Challenge3.17
Questions3.20
Justin M Olson 4 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Maxwell Staab 4 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.25
Questions4.25
Lacey Jane Wayment 7 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.23
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.88
Reflection4.50
Respect4.57
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.62
Questions5.00
Eric Miller 14 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.57
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.80
Reflection4.47
Respect4.60
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.67
Questions4.57
Hongxuan Chen 9 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.27
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.53
Reflection4.45
Respect4.82
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.91
Questions4.27
Garrett Cairo 6 reported responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.90
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.35
Reflection3.65
Respect4.60
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.30
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.00
Questions2.40
Cassandra Marisa Sanchez 16 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.35
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.10
Reflection4.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.35
Somnath Dutta 78 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.91
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.01
Reflection4.50
Respect4.95
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Timothy Maxwell Davis 19 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity4.71
Grading3.02
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback3.71
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.65
Austin Dean Bargmann 26 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Brianna Irene Check 30 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.05
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.50
Reflection4.53
Respect4.65
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.72
Questions4.64
Chenwei Lu 12 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.40
Reflection3.95
Respect4.90
Creativity3.55
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.85
Challenge3.55
Questions4.45
Qiucheng Xu 24 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.22
Collaboration4.37
Connection3.41
Contribution3.99
Discussion3.44
Inclusivity4.66
Grading3.52
Reflection3.23
Respect4.90
Creativity3.71
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.29
Challenge3.90
Questions4.11
David Reitz Zimmerman 19 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.46
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.42
Collaboration3.94
Connection3.28
Contribution3.96
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.28
Grading3.72
Reflection3.89
Respect4.76
Creativity3.99
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.04
James D Greenwood 69 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.99
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.31
Grading3.85
Reflection4.38
Respect4.40
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.38
Questions4.06
Lauren Nicole Bodkin 14 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.75
Connection2.80
Contribution2.85
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.45
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity3.45
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.65
Challenge3.60
Questions4.15
Charlie Lu 27 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.09
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.10
Reflection4.28
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.28
Questions4.10
Joy Liu 6 reported responses 2.64Eval / 5
Overall2.64 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.60
Technology2.70
Synthesis2.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection2.80
Contribution2.60
Discussion2.60
Inclusivity2.30
Grading2.30
Reflection2.60
Respect2.30
Creativity2.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction2.50
Challenge2.30
Questions2.70
Tim Davis 30 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.28
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.54
Reflection4.68
Respect4.87
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.83
Questions4.63
Joy Armendariz 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lukas Gardner 11 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.36
Connection2.97
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.57
Reflection4.27
Respect4.89
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.33
Questions4.74
Kyle Fisch 21 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.66
Contribution4.76
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.63
Reflection4.74
Respect4.00
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.08
Challenge4.11
Questions4.87
Hunter Koltunski 70 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.84
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.69
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.38
Reflection4.08
Respect4.89
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.45
Questions4.83
Jamie Stankiewiz 33 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.38
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.44
Connection3.96
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.24
Grading4.68
Reflection4.38
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.52
Questions4.66
Jacqueline Mae Richardson 2 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.54
Contribution4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Cameron Howard Lee 2 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology1.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.00
Reflection3.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions3.50
Mia Muse 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Questions5.00
Quinn Brink 54 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.27
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.46
Reflection4.44
Respect4.92
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.48
Questions4.78
Alex Laveck 21 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.97
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.23
Reflection4.33
Respect4.46
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.55
Questions4.29
Shota Hasegawa 19 reported responses 2.31Eval / 5
Overall2.31 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.40
Technology2.45
Synthesis2.60
Collaboration3.00
Connection2.00
Contribution2.15
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity1.75
Grading1.60
Reflection2.50
Respect2.70
Creativity2.50
Feedback2.05
Interaction3.05
Challenge2.40
Questions2.45
Max Abreu 22 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.25
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.83
Reflection4.43
Respect4.76
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.77
Questions4.97
Dyuti Chakraborty 20 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.84
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.08
Contribution4.18
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.72
Grading3.03
Reflection4.12
Respect4.69
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.77
Challenge3.99
Questions4.18
Abby Rawlings 15 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.02
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.68
Reflection4.31
Respect4.05
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.03
Questions3.74
Ashley Ley 24 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.07
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.07
Collaboration3.71
Connection2.85
Contribution2.91
Discussion3.27
Inclusivity2.33
Grading2.43
Reflection3.52
Respect3.14
Creativity2.42
Feedback3.03
Interaction3.54
Challenge3.11
Questions3.54
Olivia Jenks 25 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.82
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.61
Grading4.79
Reflection4.51
Respect4.72
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.74
Questions4.93
Josef Michl 1 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Zihao Yue 14 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.15
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.83
Reflection4.08
Respect4.58
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.08
Peter Ash 8 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Evan Wood 3 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
True Rappold 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Gabe Ashby 7 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Liora Goldstein 11 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Diego Arredondo 48 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.41
Connection3.92
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.01
Grading3.62
Reflection4.36
Respect4.64
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.29
Questions4.12
Cat Avarvarei 22 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.34
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity2.85
Grading4.12
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.08
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.84
Questions4.94
Jade Fullerton 11 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Antawn Gonzalez 13 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Jonathan Lee 5 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity1.75
Grading3.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.85
Feedback2.85
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.25
Lily Goulding 23 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.28
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.78
Reflection4.57
Respect5.00
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.93
Questions4.97
Himanshu Gautam 43 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.72
Contribution4.03
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.92
Reflection4.05
Respect4.50
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.12
Questions4.05
Madeline Herbrechtsmeier 16 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.69
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.54
Connection3.93
Contribution3.77
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.19
Grading3.92
Reflection4.42
Respect4.88
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.31
Questions4.69
Zach Blanks 46 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.41
Synthesis2.95
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.08
Contribution3.09
Discussion3.39
Inclusivity2.52
Grading2.86
Reflection3.30
Respect3.76
Creativity3.34
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.94
Challenge3.41
Questions3.51
Zachary Gekow 13 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.25
Contribution4.94
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.96
Reflection4.94
Respect5.00
Creativity4.91
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions4.94
Zhehao Yuan 8 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Joe Santarelli 4 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Roberto Cardenas 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Seriana Schneider 5 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.00
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.40
Reflection3.40
Respect3.60
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.40
Questions3.40
Hoang Phuc Pham 23 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.05
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.62
Reflection4.44
Respect4.83
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.51
Questions4.74
Kylie Short 17 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.98
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.69
Reflection4.46
Respect4.81
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.58
Questions4.77
Megan Morris 21 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.08
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.87
Reflection4.35
Respect4.52
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.13
Questions4.44
Jared Martin 23 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.42
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.28
Reflection4.70
Respect4.94
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.64
Questions4.70
Ki Finch 5 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Grant Spencer 12 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.22
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.23
Reflection4.55
Respect4.43
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.51
Questions4.40
William Vavrichek 5 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Kenneth Pauley 7 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.50
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.38
Reflection4.73
Respect4.85
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.54
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions5.00
Rupal Rani 17 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.43
Technology2.60
Synthesis3.08
Collaboration4.26
Connection2.69
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.13
Inclusivity2.93
Grading1.96
Reflection3.04
Respect4.13
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.26
Challenge2.96
Questions3.05
Alec Kolodziejczyk 11 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.15
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.92
Grading3.12
Reflection4.69
Respect4.70
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.12
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.46
Questions4.26
Maile Dougherty 9 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Nimesha Wickramaratne 14 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.13
Reflection4.27
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.20
Questions4.73
Breanna Wixted 6 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.