Course record CHEM

CHEM 3311

Organic Chemistry 1

University of Colorado Boulder

2,839 grades96 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work

Professors 96 of 96

Jacqueline Mae Richardson 243 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
52.7% A
28.8% B
11.5% C
2.9% D
4.1% F

243 letter grades

Compare with the course
Richardson vs. the course average
A +20.4
B −1.9
C −11.3
D −3.8
F −3.4

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 11 of 254 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Oana Luca 612 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
47.1% A
27.6% B
13.1% C
7.0% D
5.2% F

612 letter grades

Compare with the course
Luca vs. the course average
A +14.8
B −3.1
C −9.8
D +0.3
F −2.2

Difference in percentage points.

5.7% withdrew · 37 of 649 enrolled.

Open full professor record
David M Walba 114 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
33.3% A
31.6% B
35.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

114 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walba vs. the course average
A +1.1
B +0.9
C +12.2
D −6.7
F −7.5

Difference in percentage points.

5.8% withdrew · 7 of 121 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Xiang Wang 525 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
36.8% A
34.9% B
20.4% C
2.5% D
5.5% F

525 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A +4.5
B +4.2
C −2.5
D −4.3
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

5.2% withdrew · 29 of 554 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Akhileshwar Khanal 1,265 grades · 1 term 2.37GPA
20.3% A
31.0% B
29.2% C
9.1% D
10.4% F

1,265 letter grades

Compare with the course
Khanal vs. the course average
A −11.9
B +0.3
C +6.4
D +2.4
F +2.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.7% withdrew · 62 of 1,327 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Douglas L. Gin 80 grades · 1 term 2.12GPA
15.0% A
26.3% B
30.0% C
16.3% D
12.5% F

80 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gin vs. the course average
A −17.3
B −4.4
C +7.1
D +9.5
F +5.0

Difference in percentage points.

5.9% withdrew · 5 of 85 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Kamil Marsalek 35 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.66
Connection3.60
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.24
Reflection4.50
Respect4.82
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Hoai Tieu Bao Pham 14 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration2.70
Connection2.60
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.80
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Scott B Brody 23 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.40
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.45
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Keira Elizabeth Culley 35 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.00
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.78
Reflection4.73
Respect4.96
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.74
Questions4.91
Open full professor record
Brendan Alexander Langmack 19 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration4.11
Connection3.30
Contribution3.84
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.94
Reflection3.98
Respect4.47
Creativity3.96
Feedback3.52
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions3.38
Open full professor record
Justin M Olson 46 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.33
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.49
Reflection4.56
Respect4.87
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.48
Questions4.74
Open full professor record
Claire E Boronski 21 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.52
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.41
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.46
Reflection4.48
Respect4.99
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.01
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Brandon Aaron Bishop 10 reported responses 3.12Eval / 5
Overall3.12 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.26
Technology2.09
Synthesis2.26
Collaboration1.99
Connection1.94
Contribution2.03
Discussion2.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.18
Reflection2.31
Respect2.35
Creativity2.41
Feedback2.18
Interaction2.28
Challenge2.11
Questions2.31
Open full professor record
Brianna Lu Callahan 10 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.69
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration2.54
Connection4.20
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.69
Respect4.46
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.85
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Rachel Weintraub 9 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.10
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.60
Reflection3.60
Respect4.10
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions3.80
Open full professor record
Dania El-Batal 23 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.13
Connection3.97
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.83
Respect4.83
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.77
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Eric Miller 18 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.61
Collaboration3.68
Connection3.27
Contribution3.24
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.77
Grading3.91
Reflection4.21
Respect4.55
Creativity3.89
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.02
Questions4.26
Open full professor record
Shaofeng Huang 1 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Shea Osullivan 20 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.47
Connection3.13
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.27
Reflection4.10
Respect4.30
Creativity3.53
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.93
Challenge4.17
Questions3.83
Open full professor record
Tessa Hamilton Trexler Myren 43 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.58
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.50
Reflection4.42
Respect4.47
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.55
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Timothy L Minger 50 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.92
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration3.12
Connection3.28
Contribution3.69
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.84
Reflection3.79
Respect4.93
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.76
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Open full professor record
Lacey Jane Wayment 12 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.72
Connection3.72
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity3.28
Grading4.97
Reflection4.18
Respect4.50
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.22
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Hongxuan Chen 8 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.68
Technology1.79
Synthesis2.35
Collaboration3.53
Connection1.89
Contribution3.17
Discussion2.61
Inclusivity2.17
Grading2.43
Reflection3.51
Respect4.72
Creativity3.11
Feedback1.51
Interaction3.87
Challenge2.71
Questions2.80
Open full professor record
Zepeng Lei 2 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Micah Ohlhausen 3 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Madeline Walden 1 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Technology3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection1.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Maxwell Staab 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Timothy Maxwell Davis 42 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.52
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.65
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.88
Open full professor record
Brianna Irene Check 31 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration3.81
Connection3.72
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.38
Reflection4.53
Respect4.55
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.12
Questions4.35
Open full professor record
Garrett Cairo 4 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.50
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.00
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Cassandra Marisa Sanchez 12 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.15
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.15
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.25
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
James D Greenwood 44 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.70
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.22
Grading4.12
Reflection4.35
Respect4.58
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.35
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Chenwei Lu 7 reported responses 3.26Eval / 5
Overall3.26 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.65
Connection1.65
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity2.85
Feedback2.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.50
Questions3.25
Open full professor record
Qiucheng Xu 19 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.75
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.99
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.81
Questions4.99
Open full professor record
Austin Dean Bargmann 11 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.60
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Ruiheng Jing 22 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.59
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.78
Reflection4.43
Respect4.58
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.34
Questions4.59
Open full professor record
David Reitz Zimmerman 28 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.00
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.41
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.35
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Michael Joseph Stodolka 17 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.03
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity2.77
Grading4.90
Reflection4.33
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.33
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Lauren Nicole Bodkin 25 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology3.69
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.82
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.23
Reflection4.69
Respect4.88
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.78
Questions4.84
Open full professor record
Charlie Lu 18 reported responses 3.04Eval / 5
Overall3.04 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology3.12
Synthesis3.24
Collaboration3.47
Connection2.50
Contribution2.68
Discussion2.80
Inclusivity2.19
Grading3.26
Reflection3.60
Respect3.74
Creativity2.93
Feedback2.30
Interaction3.35
Challenge2.50
Questions3.53
Open full professor record
Joy Liu 4 reported responses 3.41Eval / 5
Overall3.41 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.00
Reflection3.20
Respect3.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.20
Challenge3.70
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Alan Joseph Trudeau Munoz 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Garrett Evenson 3 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Tim Davis 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Joy Armendariz 3 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.30
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Jackie Katsirubas 14 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.90
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.33
Reflection4.77
Respect5.00
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.93
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Kyle Fisch 13 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.51
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.96
Reflection4.50
Respect4.99
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.48
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Hunter Koltunski 59 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

59 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.07
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.54
Reflection4.66
Respect4.88
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.69
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Haley Ana Petersen 10 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.35
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Lukas Gardner 56 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.54
Connection3.81
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.43
Reflection4.69
Respect4.54
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Mike Stodolka 3 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Cameron Howard Lee 28 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology3.79
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.28
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.72
Grading4.68
Reflection4.69
Respect4.84
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.77
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Mia Muse 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Dyuti Chakraborty 8 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.35
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.85
Reflection3.75
Respect4.35
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.85
Questions3.75
Open full professor record
Quinn Brink 33 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.68
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.28
Grading4.50
Reflection4.64
Respect4.94
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.77
Questions4.84
Open full professor record
Ashley Ley 12 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Shota Hasegawa 16 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.45
Reflection4.40
Respect4.35
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.45
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Alex Laveck 15 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.75
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Abby Rawlings 28 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.99
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.53
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions4.99
Open full professor record
Alexandra Martinez 3 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Max Abreu 11 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.09
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.81
Reflection4.38
Respect4.81
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.38
Questions4.19
Open full professor record
Ryan Mcgregor 5 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Holly Jones 27 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.68
Reflection4.68
Respect4.87
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.60
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Evan Wood 1 reported responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading1.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Carly Kunkle 6 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Peter Ash 3 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection2.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Gabe Ashby 5 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Liora Goldstein 2 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Jonathan Lee 6 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.35
Synthesis2.65
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.90
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.85
Reflection3.85
Respect4.25
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.35
Interaction3.65
Challenge3.50
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Hoang Phuc Pham 20 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.94
Connection3.66
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.76
Reflection4.81
Respect4.96
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.53
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Diego Arredondo 16 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.18
Connection3.14
Contribution3.29
Discussion3.78
Inclusivity3.06
Grading4.22
Reflection3.96
Respect3.92
Creativity3.25
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.09
Challenge3.57
Questions4.11
Open full professor record
Jade Fullerton 14 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.60
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.95
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Himanshu Gautam 18 reported responses 3.33Eval / 5
Overall3.33 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology3.97
Synthesis3.51
Collaboration3.52
Connection3.43
Contribution3.51
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.98
Reflection3.56
Respect4.23
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.36
Interaction3.83
Challenge4.18
Questions4.06
Open full professor record
Zach Blanks 26 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.26
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration4.42
Connection3.65
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.30
Reflection4.11
Respect4.49
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.07
Questions4.12
Open full professor record
Cat Avarvarei 12 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.72
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.16
Connection3.44
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.72
Reflection4.18
Respect4.59
Creativity3.53
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.28
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Antawn Gonzalez 10 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection2.75
Contribution4.10
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Lily Goulding 12 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.88
Connection3.88
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect4.75
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Chelsea Marie Toner 21 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Madeline Herbrechtsmeier 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Discussion5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Novella Keeling 500 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

500 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.79
Connection3.46
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.03
Reflection4.24
Respect4.19
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.37
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.41
Questions4.12
Open full professor record
Joe Santarelli 25 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.18
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.90
Reflection4.88
Respect4.78
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.88
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Roberto Cardenas 3 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect3.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.00
Questions3.30
Open full professor record
Zachary Gekow 2 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Grant Spencer 37 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.89
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.50
Reflection4.77
Respect4.72
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Zhehao Yuan 2 reported responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Open full professor record
Megan Morris 43 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.76
Connection3.77
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.64
Grading4.65
Reflection4.59
Respect4.87
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.61
Questions4.91
Open full professor record
William Vavrichek 22 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.49
Connection3.79
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.31
Reflection4.08
Respect4.74
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.22
Questions4.47
Open full professor record
Ki Finch 41 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.85
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.29
Reflection4.62
Respect4.47
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.38
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Kylie Short 33 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.76
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.46
Reflection4.51
Respect4.60
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Jared Martin 13 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Kenneth Pauley 58 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.54
Connection3.65
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.43
Reflection4.54
Respect4.70
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.57
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Breanna Wixted 37 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.41
Connection3.64
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.24
Reflection4.44
Respect4.65
Creativity4.36
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.61
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Rupal Rani 8 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection2.70
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity1.30
Grading4.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.70
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.40
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Somnath Dutta 8 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Nimesha Wickramaratne 2 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.