Course record CHEM

CHEM 1401

Foundations of Chemistry Lab

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable30 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score35/100
Below average

Professors 30 of 30

Callum Ross Douglass 13 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration2.45
Connection3.75
Contribution3.05
Discussion2.55
Inclusivity1.50
Grading4.25
Reflection3.90
Respect4.10
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.60
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Madhu Singh 14 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Chelsea Marie Toner 8 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Rachel Lynn Vanosdol 14 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.25
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection3.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.10
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Haileigh Houser 13 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.60
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.35
Reflection4.00
Respect4.45
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
John James Malecha 17 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.85
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.20
Reflection4.15
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.25
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Sashi R Weerawarana 12 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.05
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.30
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.55
Reflection3.65
Respect4.85
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Alexa Rae Carollo 9 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.15
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.15
Inclusivity2.15
Grading2.80
Reflection4.05
Respect4.65
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.65
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Maxwell Staab 5 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.85
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.65
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.25
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity3.35
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.15
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Olivia Faye Bird 7 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.55
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Alan Joseph Trudeau Munoz 8 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.75
Reflection4.15
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Barbara Morales 23 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.75
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.42
Grading3.92
Reflection4.84
Respect4.56
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.41
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.74
Questions4.41
Open full professor record
Suming An 9 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Madison Rutherford 12 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.15
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Doug Pazitka-Dorado 10 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.45
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.10
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Yu Zhou 11 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.55
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.50
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.30
Reflection4.25
Respect4.25
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.25
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Roberto Cardenas 14 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.85
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.55
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Sarah Frankel 11 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Andrew Chomas 8 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.05
Reflection4.75
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Ethan Crann 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Laura Denton 23 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.20
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.04
Grading4.52
Reflection4.72
Respect4.78
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.67
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Michael Lord 12 reported responses 3.45Eval / 5
Overall3.45 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.30
Contribution2.75
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.55
Reflection3.50
Respect3.50
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.65
Questions3.95
Open full professor record
Denver Talley 13 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.30
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.65
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.25
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Nesya Sloane 10 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Tyler Grina 10 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Bert Cham 6 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Max Abreu 16 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.35
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Clare Hermanson 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.30
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Joy Liu 9 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Samantha Eyolfson 8 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.