Course record CHEM
CHEM 1113
General Chemistry 1
University of Colorado Boulder
6,926 grades253 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Melissa Christine Davis 36 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Davis vs. the course average
A
+18.5
B
−0.8
C
−2.1
D
−5.8
F
−9.8
Difference in percentage points.
10.0% withdrew · 4 of 40 enrolled.
Matthew Eric Wise 36 grades · 1 term 2.89GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wise vs. the course average
A
+13.0
B
−3.6
C
+3.5
D
−3.0
F
−9.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.67
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.87
Reflection4.79
Respect4.94
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.94
Questions4.95
Robert Parson 46 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parson vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
+1.2
C
+5.6
D
−6.4
F
−7.7
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 2 of 48 enrolled.
Overall2.80 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.65
Technology3.40
Synthesis2.75
Collaboration1.80
Connection2.45
Contribution2.20
Discussion2.25
Inclusivity2.40
Grading2.75
Reflection3.20
Respect4.30
Creativity2.90
Feedback2.00
Interaction3.45
Challenge2.95
Questions2.95
Katherine Lazenby 301 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
301 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lazenby vs. the course average
A
+6.1
B
−0.2
C
+1.5
D
−3.5
F
−3.9
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 18 of 319 enrolled.
Overall3.47 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.20
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.80
Reflection3.70
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.50
Questions3.80
Megan J Northway 53 grades · 1 term 2.64GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Northway vs. the course average
A
+14.6
B
−6.9
C
−8.2
D
−2.9
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 54 enrolled.
Overall3.21 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.52
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.27
Collaboration2.66
Connection3.02
Contribution2.84
Discussion2.78
Inclusivity2.52
Grading4.15
Reflection3.26
Respect4.59
Creativity3.65
Feedback2.44
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.44
Questions2.89
Ellen Patricia Broering Mckeown 2,670 grades · 1 term 2.52GPA
2,670 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mckeown vs. the course average
A
+1.2
B
+1.2
C
−1.7
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 158 of 2,828 enrolled.
Akhileshwar Khanal 615 grades · 1 term 2.48GPA
615 letter grades
Compare with the course
Khanal vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
+3.1
C
−1.2
D
−1.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 56 of 671 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
158 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.30
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.52
Reflection4.61
Respect4.75
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.68
Questions4.65
Alexander Saltzman 112 grades · 1 term 2.45GPA
112 letter grades
Compare with the course
Saltzman vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−5.5
C
+0.6
D
+4.9
F
−2.7
Difference in percentage points.
13.2% withdrew · 17 of 129 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.96
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.60
Reflection4.72
Respect4.80
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.56
Questions4.83
Susan Marie Hendrickson 1,247 grades · 1 term 2.41GPA
1,247 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hendrickson vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
−0.8
C
+2.4
D
+2.5
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
8.1% withdrew · 110 of 1,357 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
414 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.84
Contribution3.52
Discussion4.04
Inclusivity3.22
Grading4.37
Reflection4.31
Respect4.53
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.29
Questions4.40
Nabilah A. Rontu Carlon 1,308 grades · 1 term 2.38GPA
1,308 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carlon vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
−2.3
C
+1.0
D
same
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
7.2% withdrew · 101 of 1,409 enrolled.
Christopher Pochas 502 grades · 1 term 2.37GPA
502 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pochas vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
+0.1
C
+1.4
D
−0.8
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
7.7% withdrew · 42 of 544 enrolled.
Overall3.71 / 5
162 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.44
Technology3.98
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.24
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.53
Inclusivity2.81
Grading3.76
Reflection3.65
Respect4.32
Creativity3.04
Feedback2.83
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.69
Questions3.84
Brian E Riggs 2 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection2.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Barbara Morales 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mary Pless 8 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Ellen Broering 1,199 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
1,199 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.13
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.60
Reflection4.57
Respect4.68
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.66
Questions4.66
Ricardo Carale 9 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Nayoung Joyce Hur 15 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.75
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.60
Reflection4.35
Respect4.85
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Casey Davis 13 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Michael T Nagel 10 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.35
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.40
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.65
Logan Daniel Mccoy 14 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.65
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Austin Dean Bargmann 10 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.30
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Emily Brucks 26 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.35
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.58
Reflection4.80
Respect4.92
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.93
Questions4.97
Christopher Ill 14 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Arindam Sau 26 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology3.58
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration4.31
Connection3.74
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.41
Grading3.74
Reflection4.59
Respect4.55
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.00
Questions4.01
Raythe Elliett Douglass Owens 28 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.45
Reflection4.25
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Justin Louis Ratkovec 13 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.66
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.66
Connection3.06
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.59
Reflection4.78
Respect4.74
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.34
Questions4.72
Jason Schoeller Grue Newald 7 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.25
Connection2.65
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.15
Reflection3.10
Respect4.40
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.15
Mary Margaret O'Connor 8 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Wenhan Ou 12 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.65
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.45
Reflection4.15
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Nabilah Arshad Rontu Carlon 572 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
572 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.10
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.55
Reflection4.46
Respect4.71
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.56
Questions4.67
Yiqun Yao 13 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.55
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration4.45
Connection2.75
Contribution4.45
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity1.35
Grading4.25
Reflection3.80
Respect4.55
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.60
Questions3.75
Heinrich Johannes Salzmann 21 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration4.48
Connection3.41
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.07
Grading4.09
Reflection4.43
Respect4.66
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.52
Questions4.75
Joseph Patrick D'Alesio 14 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.25
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Robyn Sjovold 9 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology3.91
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.22
Connection3.59
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.47
Reflection4.09
Respect4.31
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.66
Challenge3.79
Questions4.31
Yuchun Cai 9 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.85
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.00
Reflection3.15
Respect4.65
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.10
Questions3.75
Carlos E Canales Moya 5 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Skylar Javin Sherman 8 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.15
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity2.90
Grading5.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Matthew Paul Mohacey 13 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.55
Respect4.25
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.45
Questions4.50
Caitlyn Helena Mendik 4 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.30
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Danielle Elizabeth Guillen 17 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.45
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Massiel Jhandery Moncada 29 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.82
Connection3.70
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.64
Reflection4.39
Respect4.79
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.28
Questions4.87
Samuel Wallace Schreiber 13 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.45
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Andrew Levin 11 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.40
Questions4.25
Joseph Watson Raso 7 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.30
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Jingyi Wu 9 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.34
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.31
Reflection4.57
Respect4.83
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.31
Questions4.91
Rishabh Shankar Tennankore 13 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis2.25
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.45
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity1.25
Grading4.35
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity2.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.35
Questions4.05
Sashi R Weerawarana 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kyle Anthony Mcmillan 12 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.15
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.55
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Sarila Morgan Ekin 5 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Shea Henning Siwik 16 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.60
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.35
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.10
Questions4.45
Alexa Rae Carollo 14 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.39
Collaboration4.71
Connection3.32
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity2.78
Grading4.53
Reflection4.25
Respect4.68
Creativity2.87
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.91
Challenge3.77
Questions4.88
Katelyn E Jewell 12 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.15
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Zachary Ross Schiffman 11 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.95
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.55
Reflection4.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Aseem Milind Visal 8 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.95
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.40
Reflection4.05
Respect4.35
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.45
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.45
Questions4.40
Randall Byron Chiu 10 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.05
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.80
Questions4.75
Lucy Hall 13 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.05
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Qiucheng Xu 31 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.79
Connection3.63
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect4.67
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.53
Questions4.81
Seonsik Yun 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.75
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.75
Reflection4.40
Respect4.25
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.45
Questions4.05
Victoria Arau 9 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.35
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.75
Maya Grace Liester 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.01
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.69
Connection3.67
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.49
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.82
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.46
Questions4.84
John Travis Chambers 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Paul Ryan Zayka 11 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.93
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.96
Reflection4.94
Respect5.00
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.94
Questions4.96
Steven Joseph Scappaticci 20 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.58
Connection3.91
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.33
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.39
Questions4.68
Maoj Awad 9 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Shamira Claire Gonzalez 10 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.10
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.65
Grading4.50
Reflection3.55
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.00
Questions4.65
Chen Li 11 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.40
Synthesis2.95
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.45
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity1.75
Grading3.35
Reflection4.40
Respect4.25
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.25
Questions4.10
Angelina Lisa Leonardi 18 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.75
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Jose De Jesus Rivera 11 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.60
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.70
Reflection3.60
Respect4.55
Creativity3.90
Feedback2.85
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.45
Jared Peter Bozzone 10 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.00
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.05
Respect4.15
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Rida Noor 10 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Ryan Kenneth Messer 8 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection2.75
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.05
Respect4.15
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.95
Questions3.65
Natalie Bess Lemessurier 11 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.30
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.65
Grading3.55
Reflection4.20
Respect4.30
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.00
Questions4.45
Samantha Michelle Rau 10 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.25
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Benjamin R Feingold 12 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.15
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.65
Jo Sony Kurian 15 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.72
Connection3.78
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.77
Reflection4.51
Respect4.78
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.80
Questions4.68
Michael Murphy Sullivan 28 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.00
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.47
Reflection4.62
Respect4.81
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.63
Questions4.77
Jessica Song 21 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.92
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.29
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.00
Reflection4.15
Respect4.23
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.34
Questions4.77
Rory Robert Mcclish 9 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.60
Reflection4.85
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Benjamin Rich 12 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.25
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Leo R Romanetz 9 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.40
Connection2.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.15
Reflection4.45
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.45
Questions4.45
Douglas J Pazitka-Dorado Jr 10 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.55
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Jessica Marie Rodino 9 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.35
Contribution4.70
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.25
Questions4.15
Dakota Ross Hunt 4 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.35
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.85
Questions4.65
Cassius Clay Boyd 8 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.40
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.90
Reflection4.85
Respect4.25
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions5.00
Makky Mousa-Makky 11 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.15
Reflection4.55
Respect4.35
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.55
Rachel Lynn Vanosdol 2 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Cooper Scott Ast 13 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.55
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.71
Reflection4.51
Respect4.57
Creativity3.86
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.62
Brinn Elizabeth Mcdowell 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Janine Dorothy Sempel 8 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.75
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.70
Reflection4.65
Respect4.50
Creativity3.65
Feedback4.05
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Jennifer Lynn Sormberger 21 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.80
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.03
Reflection4.47
Respect4.60
Creativity3.53
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.17
Questions4.47
Lane Marie Terry 22 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Chris Courter 6 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.30
Benjamin Franklin Hammel 11 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.15
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
David Vaisar 11 reported responses 3.64Eval / 5
Overall3.64 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection2.75
Contribution4.05
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity2.10
Grading3.00
Reflection3.65
Respect3.95
Creativity3.25
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.95
Questions3.35
Yu Zhou 24 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.96
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.31
Reflection4.47
Respect4.54
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.23
Questions4.48
Ashley Elizabeth Sullivan 18 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.35
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Srijan Bhattacharyya 7 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.15
Questions4.60
Brian Vincent Clark 9 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.25
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.55
Reflection3.85
Respect4.25
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.10
Questions4.75
James Spencer Stewart 4 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Liang-Chun Lin 3 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Iliya Sabzevari 6 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Duk Kyu Yi 15 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.55
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.30
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.95
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Alex Saltzman 94 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
94 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.68
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity2.87
Grading4.11
Reflection4.19
Respect4.35
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.16
Questions4.35
Ben Rich 2 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zach Wiethorn 7 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Bryce Knutson 8 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.75
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Alyvia O'Brien 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Brandon Aaron Bishop 4 reported responses 3.43Eval / 5
Overall3.43 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution2.80
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect3.80
Creativity2.20
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Dang Nguyen 7 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.90
Technology3.15
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.25
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.50
Reflection3.65
Respect4.50
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.75
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.90
Questions4.40
Samer Hammoodi 13 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.65
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Dhileep Kumar Jayashankar 12 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.15
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.85
Michael Sands 9 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.15
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.55
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity3.15
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.75
Questions4.35
Saghar Rezaie Kouhestani 22 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.39
Technology3.13
Synthesis2.93
Collaboration4.30
Connection2.49
Contribution4.06
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.48
Grading3.37
Reflection3.73
Respect3.19
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.18
Interaction4.08
Challenge3.91
Questions3.63
Miles San Soucie 10 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.05
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.40
Grading4.05
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.10
Questions4.90
Zack Krajnak 15 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.15
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.49
Reflection4.46
Respect4.76
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.61
Questions4.70
Kelsey Levine 18 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.24
Connection3.65
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.21
Reflection4.38
Respect4.19
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.26
Questions4.73
Lillian Mortensen 17 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.75
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.25
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Kyle Tyner 13 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.16
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.63
Reflection4.94
Respect4.94
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.98
Questions4.94
Ally Stjean 25 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.20
Questions4.65
Roberto Cardenas 21 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.25
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.51
Reflection4.90
Respect4.51
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.61
Leyla Akh 13 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Andrew Lazaro Sarino 13 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.35
Reflection4.30
Respect4.05
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.45
Questions4.60
Benjamin Thomas Hohman 5 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity2.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Nianzi Liu 12 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.50
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.10
Respect4.55
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.95
Omar Hassan 8 reported responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.20
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.10
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.50
Questions4.50
Olusola Akinbami 9 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.15
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.25
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Garrett Evenson 5 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.20
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.80
Questions3.60
Jordan Winetrout 19 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology3.73
Synthesis3.59
Collaboration4.08
Connection3.38
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.24
Grading4.13
Reflection3.97
Respect4.52
Creativity3.72
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.18
Questions4.50
Chuy Rivera 23 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.67
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.67
Reflection4.93
Respect4.99
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Minyan Wang 3 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis2.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection2.50
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity2.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.30
Justin Speregen 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.35
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.25
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Samuel Coates 6 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.35
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.85
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Patrick Holland 19 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.39
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.58
Reflection4.57
Respect4.47
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.84
Questions4.88
Leonard Cahya 5 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Vikina Martinez 12 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.25
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.25
Questions4.25
Ashleigh Parish 12 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.15
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.65
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Jack Joseph Elwood 7 reported responses 3.41Eval / 5
Overall3.41 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection2.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.20
Reflection3.10
Respect4.00
Creativity3.20
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.60
Questions3.70
Ruhi Patel 10 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.86
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.95
Reflection4.93
Respect4.94
Creativity3.56
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.28
Questions4.96
Bola Odunaro 5 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.15
Respect5.00
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.90
Questions4.65
Apurva Sharma 41 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.79
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.60
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity3.79
Grading4.13
Reflection4.40
Respect4.43
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.04
Questions4.45
Romulo Cruz Simbron 13 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.55
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.15
Questions4.45
Bailey Knierim 17 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity2.85
Grading3.95
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Kaitlyn Johnson 33 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.68
Connection3.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.65
Reflection4.70
Respect4.93
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.48
Questions4.95
Sarah Frankel 14 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.32
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.44
Reflection4.70
Respect4.98
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.70
Questions4.98
Keller Elswick 22 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.10
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.73
Reflection4.93
Respect4.80
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Mia Muse 26 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.15
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Maddie Klumb 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Emily Zabor 5 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Monica Ochoa 15 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.95
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.65
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Charlie Lu 7 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.14
Technology2.21
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.46
Connection2.89
Contribution3.98
Discussion2.98
Inclusivity2.25
Grading3.62
Reflection4.00
Respect4.08
Creativity3.08
Feedback2.17
Interaction4.64
Challenge3.12
Questions3.32
Doug Pazitka-Dorado 1 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andre Schaum 19 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Taime Clark 46 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.58
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.90
Reflection4.85
Respect4.89
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.84
Questions4.97
Nikki Wrobel 15 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.58
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.86
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.85
Questions4.93
Clara Lietzke 20 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.85
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Laura Denton 23 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.86
Connection3.82
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.88
Reflection4.76
Respect4.82
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.79
Questions5.00
Daria Sukhareva 22 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.19
Synthesis3.58
Collaboration4.36
Connection3.14
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.39
Grading3.78
Reflection4.30
Respect4.18
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.22
Questions4.36
Denver Talley 8 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.60
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Jeff Price 8 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.45
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading2.95
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Bert Cham 11 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Yihan Wu 8 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.35
Reflection3.85
Respect4.50
Creativity3.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge3.85
Questions4.90
Brian Nies 13 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.75
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity2.25
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Omar Armenta 2 reported responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity2.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge2.50
Questions5.00
Jonathan Lee 17 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology3.92
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.89
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.17
Reflection4.60
Respect4.28
Creativity3.92
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.60
Questions4.19
Yukai Tomsovic 14 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.65
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.55
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Matteo Poma 11 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.40
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.95
Hamza Ansar 16 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.95
Connection3.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect4.75
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.95
Questions4.85
John Rynk 14 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.05
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.15
Questions4.70
Ellie Lander 19 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.90
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.25
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.35
Questions4.85
Olivia Pear 3 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Daniel Estrin 7 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Morgane Herlory 11 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.09
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.93
Reflection4.98
Respect4.77
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Baljit Singh 12 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.25
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.45
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity3.55
Grading2.80
Reflection4.10
Respect3.60
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.15
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.15
Questions3.85
Liam Warren 10 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.35
Reflection4.30
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.20
Questions4.35
Jill Addington 8 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Cameron Mollazadeh 12 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.85
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Danya Al Nazal 7 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.60
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.90
Ashutosh Mishra 37 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.44
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.37
Reflection4.77
Respect4.75
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.76
Questions4.77
Shota Hasegawa 11 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.25
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.25
Reflection4.45
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Drew Blauth 11 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Antonio Yervez 16 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.15
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.95
Questions4.65
Katie Stevenson 12 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.95
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jim Hall 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Andrew Chomas 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Nicole Clark 21 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology3.27
Synthesis3.68
Collaboration4.73
Connection3.22
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.09
Reflection3.99
Respect4.79
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.34
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.18
Questions4.49
Natalie Zeps 24 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.90
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.84
Grading4.65
Reflection4.63
Respect4.84
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Amanda Hoffman 9 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.15
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.15
Reflection4.25
Respect4.20
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Erin Jacoski 22 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.47
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.63
Reflection4.72
Respect4.84
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.70
Questions4.78
Joy Liu 11 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.29
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.91
Reflection4.85
Respect4.91
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.72
Questions5.00
Leo Bloxham 27 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.55
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.02
Grading4.13
Reflection4.54
Respect4.51
Creativity3.86
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.61
Questions4.93
Marcus Mullen 17 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.16
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.92
Connection3.65
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.73
Grading4.49
Reflection4.71
Respect4.88
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.76
Questions4.88
Ryan Benson 34 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.02
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.83
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.88
Questions4.91
Piper Read 19 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.92
Connection3.82
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.62
Reflection4.60
Respect4.72
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.58
Questions4.77
Grace Shelby 6 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Pranay Venkatesh 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.61
Connection3.69
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.19
Grading4.21
Reflection4.47
Respect4.48
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.69
Savanah Neupert 11 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.90
Reflection4.95
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Subrata Pal 27 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.06
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.58
Reflection4.39
Respect4.85
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.53
Questions4.63
Micah Duffield 23 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.73
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity3.32
Grading4.28
Reflection4.52
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.60
Questions4.86
Shannon Ganley 11 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.75
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.65
Reflection4.60
Respect4.25
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Max Muter 29 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.34
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.52
Questions4.95
Sofia Allison 10 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Abhigyan Deoli 40 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.72
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.49
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.16
Contribution3.61
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.08
Reflection3.71
Respect4.14
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.44
Challenge3.58
Questions3.97
Soorya Gnanasegaran 19 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology3.57
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration4.72
Connection3.85
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.96
Grading3.90
Reflection4.53
Respect4.44
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.32
Questions4.30
Zanub Rahman 21 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.38
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.52
Reflection4.72
Respect4.61
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.69
Questions4.63
Steph Allison Moser 6 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Arriana Bisram 12 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.95
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.95
Mak Regan 8 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Lauren Denise Bauerle 62 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Lily Harmon 9 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.73
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity2.85
Grading4.35
Reflection4.67
Respect4.23
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.47
Questions4.67
Alina Margarita Mateo 17 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.55
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.55
Evy Bernardette Mcumber 10 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.32
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.43
Reflection4.23
Respect4.84
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.84
Questions4.87
Somnath Dutta 4 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Max Abreu 2 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michael Anthony Swanson 290 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
290 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology4.47
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.49
Connection3.72
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity3.32
Grading4.17
Reflection4.23
Respect4.40
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.37
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.30
Questions4.36
Blaine Cooper 12 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.85
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Brenner Klein 12 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.65
Grading4.25
Reflection4.90
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Zahra Linsky 10 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.55
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection2.80
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.55
Reflection4.50
Respect4.55
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.00
Questions4.55
Novik Thomas 8 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.05
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Sophia Zinn 9 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.65
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.85
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Yilni Bioltif 15 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.85
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.95
Questions4.85
Eric Lian 9 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.45
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.25
Reflection4.55
Respect4.10
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.25
Questions4.85
Joseph Delaloye 11 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.59
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.63
Reflection4.67
Respect4.98
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.95
Questions4.83
Emily Rogers 10 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.55
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.65
Aubrey Wolfe 9 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.90
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Caleb Brzezinski 15 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology3.84
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.62
Connection3.59
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.26
Reflection4.57
Respect4.88
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.18
Questions4.84
Sydney Edwards 7 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.20
Reflection4.05
Respect4.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.10
Questions4.75
Camille Conte 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Tyler Kenyon 15 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Ananya Sharma 17 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.34
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.67
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.02
Reflection4.61
Respect4.46
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.48
Questions4.07
Nimesha Wickramaratne 7 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.10
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Ashly Leos 25 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.73
Connection3.74
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity3.04
Grading4.71
Reflection4.51
Respect4.58
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.68
Questions4.84
Vanessa Nguyen 13 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.55
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Annie Schafer 10 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Zhen Cai 8 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.60
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.75
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.05
Challenge3.90
Questions4.25
Zirui Wang 5 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection2.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity1.50
Grading2.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.60
Questions3.00
Micah Robyn 16 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.80
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.25
Reflection4.75
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.95
Lillian Welsh 5 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Laura Breternitz 7 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.50
Reflection4.15
Respect4.30
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.25
Questions4.40
Gabrielle Ho 5 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Heejoo Kang 8 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.50
Connection2.85
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.85
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge3.85
Questions4.85
Elyse Meade 2 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Honghao Wang 7 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.55
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.90
Respect4.25
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Emily Theresa Sabo 45 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.40
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.00
Questions4.10
Jacob Simonpietri 9 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Nissa Watkins 9 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Paige Difronzo 11 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.40
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.00
Reflection4.65
Respect4.35
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.35
Vance Fowler 13 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.15
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.25
Reflection4.55
Respect4.55
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Serim Park 11 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.95
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect3.95
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
Alexander Mommer 5 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.35
Contribution3.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.25
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Nolan Downie 12 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Audrey Lyp 8 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.40
Contribution4.45
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.60
Grading4.20
Reflection3.95
Respect4.35
Creativity3.15
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions4.95
Elisa Del Chiaro 5 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.20
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Tyler Grina 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection2.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.