Course record CHEM

CHEM 1021

Introductory Chemistry

University of Colorado Boulder

2,847 grades81 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work

Professors 81 of 81

Akhileshwar Khanal 36 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
36.1% A
36.1% B
13.9% C
2.8% D
11.1% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course
Khanal vs. the course average
A +9.7
B +6.0
C −11.0
D −8.2
F +3.5

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.

Christine Mina Kelly 236 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
27.5% A
36.4% B
25.4% C
3.4% D
7.2% F

236 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kelly vs. the course average
A +1.1
B +6.4
C +0.5
D −7.6
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

9.6% withdrew · 25 of 261 enrolled.

Jay Kroll 1,659 grades · 1 term 2.64GPA
28.5% A
30.6% B
24.8% C
9.7% D
6.4% F

1,659 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kroll vs. the course average
A +2.0
B +0.5
C −0.1
D −1.3
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

5.0% withdrew · 87 of 1,746 enrolled.

Thomas John Kolibaba 154 grades · 1 term 2.54GPA
22.7% A
33.8% B
28.6% C
7.8% D
7.1% F

154 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kolibaba vs. the course average
A −3.7
B +3.7
C +3.7
D −3.2
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 4 of 158 enrolled.

Athena Jin 151 grades · 1 term 2.38GPA
19.9% A
31.1% B
24.5% C
16.6% D
7.9% F

151 letter grades

Compare with the course
Jin vs. the course average
A −6.6
B +1.1
C −0.4
D +5.6
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

5.0% withdrew · 8 of 159 enrolled.

Matthew Eric Wise 611 grades · 1 term 2.30GPA
22.6% A
24.7% B
24.7% C
17.3% D
10.6% F

611 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wise vs. the course average
A −3.9
B −5.4
C −0.2
D +6.4
F +3.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.4% withdrew · 42 of 653 enrolled.

Alec Kroll 907 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

907 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.27
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.65
Reflection4.57
Respect4.79
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.64
Questions4.84
Lauren Claire Atencio 22 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.93
Connection3.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.13
Reflection4.33
Respect4.63
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Paul Ryan Zayka 31 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.76
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.72
Reflection4.53
Respect4.69
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.56
Questions4.89
Seth William Mcpherson 21 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration3.23
Connection3.23
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.07
Reflection3.87
Respect4.13
Creativity3.53
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Brianna Elise Dobson 56 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.49
Connection3.74
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.41
Grading4.45
Reflection4.43
Respect4.83
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.79
Questions4.88
Seonsik Yun 23 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.93
Contribution3.23
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.03
Reflection4.27
Respect4.60
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.47
Zhenxing Liu 27 reported responses 3.64Eval / 5
Overall3.64 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.13
Technology3.90
Synthesis2.77
Collaboration2.63
Connection2.93
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity2.93
Grading3.70
Reflection3.67
Respect4.63
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.23
Challenge3.40
Questions4.13
Brianna Lee Fernandez 14 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.80
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.35
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Yu Zhou 23 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.53
Connection3.17
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity2.87
Grading3.70
Reflection3.83
Respect3.93
Creativity3.47
Feedback3.33
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.60
Questions4.17
Anthony Pimentel 3 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Sohan N. Sur 2 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Julia Ellen Roberts 31 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.63
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.63
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.43
Questions4.67
Tri H Le 19 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.37
Technology4.03
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.83
Connection2.83
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity2.17
Grading3.67
Reflection3.53
Respect4.07
Creativity3.03
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.07
Challenge3.30
Questions4.03
Jackson Brill 23 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.67
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.77
Connection3.90
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.37
Reflection4.13
Respect4.70
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.53
Questions4.57
Kaitlin Alecia Garman 23 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.43
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.37
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.03
Reflection4.47
Respect4.53
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Janine Dorothy Sempel 25 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.17
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.33
Connection3.33
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.03
Reflection3.87
Respect4.67
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.83
Questions4.67
Olivia Faye Bird 21 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.83
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.57
Reflection4.30
Respect4.63
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.93
Zachary Wiethorn 19 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.67
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.57
Contribution3.83
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.37
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.27
Challenge3.60
Questions4.47
Lane Marie Terry 31 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.67
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.43
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.67
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.43
Questions4.77
Joseline Aquino 20 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.87
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.13
Connection3.67
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.50
Reflection4.37
Respect4.50
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.10
Questions4.57
David Vaisar 28 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology3.83
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.77
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.80
Reflection3.83
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.13
Questions3.93
Wyndom Sage Chace 21 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.33
Connection3.97
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.77
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.63
Questions4.93
Matthew Paul Mohacey 7 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration3.00
Connection2.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.90
Reflection3.10
Respect4.00
Creativity2.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.30
Questions4.60
Daniella Ugay 13 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.20
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.90
Reflection3.97
Respect4.30
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.97
Challenge4.07
Questions4.13
Leo R Romanetz 35 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.72
Connection3.75
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.45
Reflection4.45
Respect4.78
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.62
Questions4.62
Gaia Rachel Bublitz 18 reported responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.43
Technology2.90
Synthesis2.43
Collaboration4.10
Connection2.33
Contribution3.03
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity1.87
Grading3.20
Reflection3.27
Respect3.53
Creativity3.47
Feedback3.17
Interaction3.67
Challenge3.13
Questions4.03
Natalie Bess Lemessurier 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.03
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.43
Reflection4.37
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.93
Questions5.00
Maya Grace Liester 8 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.82
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.84
Grading4.37
Reflection4.42
Respect4.72
Creativity4.58
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Rachel Weintraub 3 reported responses 2.28Eval / 5
Overall2.28 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis2.30
Collaboration2.70
Connection2.00
Contribution2.70
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.00
Reflection2.70
Respect2.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction2.70
Challenge2.70
Questions2.00
Nabilah Arshad Rontu Carlon 6 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology3.61
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.02
Contribution3.61
Discussion3.61
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.48
Reflection3.61
Respect4.07
Creativity3.12
Feedback4.48
Interaction3.58
Challenge4.52
Questions4.98
Haileigh Houser 3 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Romulo Cruz Simbron 12 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.93
Connection3.77
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.83
Reflection4.60
Respect4.73
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.53
Questions4.53
Bola Odunaro 26 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.20
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity2.97
Grading3.27
Reflection3.93
Respect4.50
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.03
Questions4.10
Samantha Eyolfson 36 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.91
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.05
Reflection4.70
Respect4.98
Creativity3.48
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.71
Questions4.62
Chloe Henson 22 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.70
Reflection4.93
Respect4.87
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.87
Liang-Chun Lin 24 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.47
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.13
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.67
Grading3.77
Reflection3.97
Respect4.13
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.10
Questions3.87
Manoj Settipalli 15 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.43
Contribution3.33
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.53
Grading3.60
Reflection3.93
Respect3.83
Creativity3.67
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.00
Questions4.03
Alina Margarita Mateo 12 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.83
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.13
Connection3.40
Contribution3.83
Discussion3.47
Inclusivity3.17
Grading3.40
Reflection3.60
Respect3.47
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.03
Interaction3.63
Challenge3.97
Questions4.13
Manmohan Upmanu 4 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.20
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions3.20
Lillian Mortensen 16 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.63
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.83
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.93
Questions5.00
Emily Kite 18 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.75
Reflection4.95
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Yashveer Soni 18 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.07
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.80
Reflection4.43
Respect4.43
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.33
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.27
Questions4.30
Nicole Silver 20 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.87
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.43
Reflection4.57
Respect4.77
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.57
Questions4.70
Liam Warren 27 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.77
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.17
Grading3.73
Reflection4.40
Respect4.43
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Katie Stevenson 22 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.70
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.50
Reflection4.27
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.77
Questions4.53
Joy Edwin-Ezeh 28 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.77
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.47
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.63
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Jill Addington 30 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.73
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.33
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Henry Cardwell 10 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Morgane Herlory 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Lauren Denise Bauerle 107 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

107 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.74
Connection3.69
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity3.51
Grading4.09
Reflection3.97
Respect4.40
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.26
Challenge3.98
Questions4.41
Jonathan Lee 30 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology4.17
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.33
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.27
Grading3.93
Reflection4.37
Respect4.50
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.20
Questions4.37
Tony Hampton 16 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Margarita Reza 33 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.20
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.53
Reflection4.63
Respect5.00
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.77
Questions4.87
Ben Rich 20 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.73
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.07
Grading3.57
Reflection4.60
Respect4.30
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.17
Questions4.77
Keagan Hesse 19 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.67
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.38
Reflection4.61
Respect4.77
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.75
Questions4.81
Rashmi Pant 10 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.45
Contribution3.25
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.00
Reflection3.55
Respect4.40
Creativity3.95
Feedback2.45
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.55
Questions3.95
Ana Curry 31 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.54
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.48
Reflection4.84
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.75
Questions4.92
Drew O'Brien 21 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.00
Contribution3.77
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.86
Grading3.98
Reflection4.77
Respect4.71
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.79
Holly Jones 18 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.45
Arriana Bisram 14 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.95
Contribution4.45
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lily Harmon 23 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.72
Connection3.68
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.11
Grading4.37
Reflection4.75
Respect4.62
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.42
Questions4.60
Yilni Bioltif 31 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.58
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.56
Grading3.93
Reflection4.09
Respect4.39
Creativity4.14
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.47
Questions4.58
Zhen Cai 26 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.24
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.64
Reflection4.59
Respect4.78
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.33
Questions4.36
Subrata Pal 30 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.65
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.53
Reflection4.28
Respect4.13
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.02
Questions4.18
Jessie Porterfield 8 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.68
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.95
Grading5.00
Reflection4.91
Respect4.95
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.91
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Nissa Watkins 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Heejoo Kang 13 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.65
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.15
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Olivia Rourke 8 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.20
Contribution3.35
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.35
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Micaela Primer 16 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Tyler Koo 6 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.15
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.20
Reflection3.85
Respect4.65
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.35
Questions4.15
Ruby Burgess 26 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.07
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.29
Reflection4.66
Respect4.87
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.53
Questions4.77
Anjali Kalagiri 11 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.57
Contribution4.73
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.67
Respect4.83
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.87
Questions4.73
Emily Rogers 11 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.87
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.43
Reflection4.57
Respect4.93
Creativity3.40
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.73
Questions4.87
Sophia Zinn 9 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.75
Reflection4.20
Respect4.25
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions3.95
Nicole Clark 3 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.