Course record BADM
BADM 1250
Designing Your Leeds 1: Exploration
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable51 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Alex Cummings 49 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.77
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.77
Andrea Rooks Straccia 49 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.77
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.43
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.87
Jaclyn Ann Abeloe 140 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.61
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.03
Reflection4.48
Respect4.66
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.37
Questions4.58
Casey Rosser 113 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
113 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.73
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.59
Reflection4.65
Respect4.73
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.49
Questions4.88
Marie Aurelie Gschwindt De Gyor 32 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.80
Danielle Young 136 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
136 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.76
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.49
Reflection4.82
Respect4.74
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.49
Questions4.83
Lance Wade Duffin 113 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
113 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.68
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.55
Reflection4.63
Respect4.70
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.46
Questions4.68
Zavannah Dior Middlebrooks 8 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.10
Mary Guenther 275 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
275 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.56
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.52
Reflection4.72
Respect4.87
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.54
Questions4.67
Heather Rebecca Clark 170 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
170 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration2.99
Connection4.33
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.79
Reflection4.24
Respect4.38
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.45
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.23
Questions3.95
Stephen Heymann 345 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
345 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.17
Connection4.34
Contribution3.99
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.56
Grading3.80
Reflection4.22
Respect4.34
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.47
Interaction3.93
Challenge4.16
Questions4.04
Vanessa Muriel Napier 387 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
387 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.44
Contribution3.83
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.36
Reflection4.16
Respect4.48
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.26
Questions4.02
Sarah Rosenbaum Cowan 56 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.82
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.83
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.65
Questions4.79
Darrell S Zechman 152 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.74
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.28
Reflection4.59
Respect4.76
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.63
Questions4.59
Debbie Chien-Hui Barday 77 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.82
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.33
Reflection4.78
Respect4.95
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.80
Questions4.79
Christina Kathleen Elmblad 26 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.80
Questions4.10
Kelli Elizabeth Baldner 23 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.25
Reflection4.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Alfred Warner Smith 23 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.65
Heidi Hulse 85 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.84
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.56
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.71
Questions4.83
Susmita Saha 40 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology3.43
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.02
Contribution3.27
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.56
Grading3.14
Reflection3.75
Respect4.28
Creativity3.38
Feedback3.08
Interaction4.11
Challenge3.61
Questions3.55
Alexandra Christine Cummings 108 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
108 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.58
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.31
Reflection4.45
Respect4.74
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.37
Questions4.57
Christina Elmblad Renegar 117 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.52
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.25
Reflection4.40
Respect4.39
Creativity4.29
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.29
Questions4.56
Heather Rebecca Venechuk 319 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
319 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.47
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.86
Reflection4.29
Respect4.42
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.27
Questions4.15
Sally Ann Forester 22 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Laura Joyce Kornish 39 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.51
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.85
Reflection4.71
Respect4.89
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.74
Questions4.87
Kelli E Stevens 56 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.89
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.73
Reflection4.79
Respect4.92
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.88
Questions4.75
Brooke Ann Lloyd 36 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.81
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.02
Reflection4.56
Respect4.78
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.78
Zavannah Dior Wells 105 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.68
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.52
Reflection4.63
Respect4.73
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.51
Questions4.72
Carly Mcniece 16 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Sara M. Thompson 48 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.62
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.46
Reflection4.75
Respect4.89
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.43
Questions4.58
Brionna Orozco 57 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.90
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.68
Reflection4.79
Respect4.92
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.90
Questions4.79
Jorge E Cisneros 18 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.30
Laura Antoinette Moore 18 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Kevin Prochaska 47 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.86
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.18
Reflection4.83
Respect4.70
Creativity4.58
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.62
Questions4.55
Danielle Wall 104 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.39
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.06
Reflection4.46
Respect4.69
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.37
Questions4.57
Amanda Lucile Hansen 31 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.37
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.71
Grading3.73
Reflection4.33
Respect4.43
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.34
Questions4.35
Zachary Johnson 9 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Kate Rogers 61 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.57
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.57
Reflection4.57
Respect4.67
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.77
Michelle Schroder 19 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.27
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity3.98
Grading3.90
Reflection4.42
Respect4.51
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.17
Questions4.18
Marcus Bell 116 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
116 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.67
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.27
Reflection4.62
Respect4.66
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.58
Questions4.69
Rolando Rodriguez 140 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.55
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity4.12
Grading3.96
Reflection4.37
Respect4.37
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.26
Questions4.32
Zoe Mertz 65 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.60
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.54
Reflection4.64
Respect4.88
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.51
Questions4.68
Rachel Rea 37 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.61
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.56
Reflection4.81
Respect4.89
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.46
Questions4.91
Emily Winkler 12 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Laura Garcia Sanchez 23 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.69
Technology3.23
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.99
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.06
Inclusivity3.72
Grading3.32
Reflection4.10
Respect4.26
Creativity3.69
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.34
Challenge3.82
Questions3.89
Jennifer Emerling Bone 18 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.93
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.86
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.86
Questions4.93
Mckenzie I Maneggia 19 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Evan Castrodale 11 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Jennifer Jane Hanson 48 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.45
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.30
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.65
Mindy J Sclaro 8 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Alyssa Simone Radtke 27 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.