Course record ATOC
ATOC 4500
Special Topics in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences - Upper Division
University of Colorado Boulder
221 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score64/100
Strong
Darin W Toohey 29 grades · 1 term 3.90GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Toohey vs. the course average
A
+15.6
B
−14.0
C
+0.7
D
−0.5
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.98
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.08
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.94
Grading2.37
Reflection3.62
Respect4.72
Creativity3.14
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.24
Challenge3.32
Questions4.79
Aneesh Chamakuzhi Subramanian 25 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Subramanian vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
+2.0
C
−2.7
D
−0.5
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 1 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.73
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.95
Reflection4.57
Respect4.88
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Julie Kay Lundquist 25 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lundquist vs. the course average
A
−9.0
B
+2.0
C
+5.3
D
+3.5
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
10.7% withdrew · 3 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Pedro Nicolas Di Nezio 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.63
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.82
Grading3.90
Reflection4.63
Respect4.82
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.45
Questions4.63
Jeffrey B Weiss 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration3.51
Connection4.99
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading3.51
Reflection4.51
Respect5.00
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.99
Questions4.99
Julia M Moriarty 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
11.1% withdrew · 2 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.76
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.31
Reflection4.84
Respect4.78
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.82
Questions4.68
Zhien Wang 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
13.6% withdrew · 3 of 22 enrolled.
Jennifer E. Kay 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Owen Brian Toon 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.57GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
8.0% withdrew · 2 of 25 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.63
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration2.56
Connection4.09
Contribution3.36
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity2.88
Grading3.61
Reflection3.85
Respect4.68
Creativity4.09
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.02
Challenge4.02
Questions4.14
Jan Lenaerts 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.56GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Andrew Winters 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.25GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 1 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.89 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
David E Kingsmill 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.21GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
16.7% withdrew · 2 of 12 enrolled.
Dezheng Sun 15 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.96
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.82
Grading2.81
Reflection4.93
Respect4.58
Creativity4.85
Feedback2.71
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.56
Questions3.56
Pedro Maguire Dinezio 6 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.63
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.82
Grading3.90
Reflection4.63
Respect4.82
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.45
Questions4.63
Donata Giglio 13 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.77
Synthesis3.54
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.32
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.04
Reflection4.58
Respect4.70
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.42
Questions4.89
Alexandra Jahn 7 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jianghanyang Li 6 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Max Elling 8 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.