Course record ATOC
ATOC 1070
Weather and the Atmosphere Laboratory
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable45 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score48/100
Mixed record
Giovanni Gabriel Seijo 22 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity2.85
Grading3.60
Reflection3.60
Respect4.15
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.75
Questions4.00
Cole Frederick Persch 33 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.62
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.75
Reflection4.53
Respect4.96
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.78
Questions4.73
Rebecca Baiman 17 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.35
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.65
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.65
Andrew S Metz 26 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.19
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.79
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.73
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.81
Questions4.90
Derek Philip Brown 73 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.80
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.89
Reflection4.79
Respect4.79
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.57
Questions4.90
Megan Thompson-Munson 21 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.80
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.95
Jessica Kelly Egan 49 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.13
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.23
Reflection4.23
Respect4.72
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.22
Questions4.47
Irfan Alam 16 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.25
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.85
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.45
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.05
Questions3.85
Hannah Elise Frederick 13 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Mia Vanderwilt 8 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Blessing Ife Sokoya 25 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.35
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Gabriella Therese Brinkley 38 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.64
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration4.44
Connection3.84
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.46
Reflection3.92
Respect4.36
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.01
Questions4.31
Joshua James Mauss 22 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.25
Reflection4.42
Respect4.48
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.48
Questions4.78
Nathan Agarwal 6 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.65
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.75
Reflection3.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Theodore George Whittock Iii 8 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Brennan Erik Dettmann 4 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Nayoung Joyce Hur 7 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.25
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Lucas Howard 3 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.30
Questions4.30
Lauren Jeanne Magliozzi 26 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.60
Reflection4.88
Respect4.95
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.88
Sean Dylan Leister 34 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.45
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.73
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.85
Sydney Kramer 18 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.70
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Colby Brabec 20 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.13
Technology4.04
Synthesis3.27
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.12
Contribution3.76
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.53
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.64
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.43
Challenge3.80
Questions3.53
Emily Wein 38 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.49
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.33
Contribution3.56
Discussion3.61
Inclusivity3.56
Grading3.57
Reflection3.77
Respect4.01
Creativity3.16
Feedback2.88
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.11
Questions3.83
William Bertrand 12 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.75
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Tim Higgins 6 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Jonah Shaw 13 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.45
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.15
Questions4.20
Sierra Liotta 19 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.60
Reflection4.51
Respect4.90
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.66
Questions4.67
Nadiyah Williams 35 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.27
Contribution2.95
Discussion3.23
Inclusivity3.03
Grading3.95
Reflection3.61
Respect4.35
Creativity3.89
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.09
Challenge3.69
Questions3.66
Grace Kirkpatrick 9 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution2.75
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.15
Reflection3.60
Respect2.70
Creativity3.15
Feedback2.35
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.90
Questions2.65
Isaac Davis 4 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Erin Guderian 12 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.53
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.98
Reflection4.97
Respect4.98
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.97
Questions5.00
Dorian Schwartz 51 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.62
Reflection4.59
Respect4.69
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.47
Questions4.74
Brooke Chase 27 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.80
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.82
Reflection4.69
Respect4.96
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Naveena Ganesan 38 reported responses 3.23Eval / 5
Overall3.23 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.22
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.21
Collaboration4.36
Connection3.26
Contribution2.82
Discussion2.42
Inclusivity2.59
Grading2.57
Reflection2.90
Respect2.88
Creativity3.09
Feedback2.33
Interaction3.49
Challenge2.97
Questions2.70
Kevin Rozmiarek 25 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.55
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Andrew Buggee 40 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.70
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.95
Blanca Hinojosa 21 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.81
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.84
Reflection4.81
Respect4.84
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.78
Questions4.94
Adam Odorisio 10 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Eleanor Salm 11 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.65
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.95
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Maggie Scholer 10 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Ona Melvin 25 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.75
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Naya Oreilly 9 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.25
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.15
Questions4.55
Varun Narayanan 10 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.20
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Ashwin Francis 5 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.75
Questions5.00
Abhistha Singh 15 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.