Course record ASTR
ASTR 1040
Accelerated Introductory Astronomy 2
University of Colorado Boulder
529 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Erica Lynn Nelson 245 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
245 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nelson vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−2.4
C
−5.7
D
−2.4
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 8 of 253 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.41
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.31
Reflection4.51
Respect4.61
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.61
Questions4.41
Robert E Ergun 34 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ergun vs. the course average
A
+12.4
B
−14.7
C
−1.7
D
+0.1
F
+3.8
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 2 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Loren Matilsky 79 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
79 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matilsky vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
+3.9
C
+0.5
D
+3.5
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 80 enrolled.
Mark Peter Rast 171 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
171 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rast vs. the course average
A
−16.0
B
+4.5
C
+8.2
D
+1.8
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 3 of 174 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.04
Collaboration3.82
Connection4.29
Contribution3.76
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.92
Grading3.84
Reflection4.16
Respect4.54
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.26
Questions4.55
Tyler Bishop 30 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.58
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.09
Reflection4.74
Respect4.82
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.58
Questions4.71
Kirk Alan Long 48 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.31
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.44
Reflection4.51
Respect4.06
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.78
Questions4.73
Teddy Culman 13 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Matt Kalscheur 19 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.87
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.73
Reflection4.77
Respect4.80
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.73
Questions4.87
Drake Miller 7 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.15
Contribution2.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.35
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Garyfallia Strus 16 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.43
Reflection4.67
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.43
Questions4.90
Marialis Rosario 69 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.17
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.24
Reflection4.36
Respect4.71
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.21
Questions4.28
Chlo<Eb> Benton 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.67
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.83
Reflection4.83
Respect4.83
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.73
Questions4.83
Abhishek Lohith Kumar 18 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.25
Reflection3.65
Respect4.40
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.75
Questions4.55
Natalia Porraz 18 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.50
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.20
Reflection4.05
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.95
Questions4.75
Valerie Arriero 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
James Crowley 10 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Daniel Mendoza 26 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.93
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.33
Reflection4.43
Respect4.67
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.50
Questions4.77
Derric Loya 9 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.