Course record ASEN

ASEN 6519

Special Topics

University of Colorado Boulder

199 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score70/100
Strong

Professors 15 of 15

Nisar Razzi Ahmed 50 grades · 1 term 3.92GPA
94.0% A
6.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

50 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ahmed vs. the course average
A +4.1
B −3.0
C same
D −0.5
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.8% withdrew · 2 of 52 enrolled.

Torin K Clark 41 grades · 1 term 3.91GPA
95.1% A
4.9% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

41 letter grades

Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A +5.2
B −4.2
C same
D −0.5
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 41 enrolled.

Zachary Sunberg 40 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
82.5% A
15.0% B
0.0% C
2.5% D
0.0% F

40 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sunberg vs. the course average
A −7.4
B +6.0
C same
D +2.0
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 40 enrolled.

Allison Paige Anderson 33 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
81.8% A
15.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Anderson vs. the course average
A −8.1
B +6.1
C same
D −0.5
F +2.5

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 1 of 34 enrolled.

Jeffrey P Thayer 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

10 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.

Yu T Morton 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

10 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.

Morteza Mehdi Lahijanian 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.85GPA
86.7% A
13.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

15 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.

Marcus J Holzinger 6 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.75
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.75
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Sanghamitra Neogi 8 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.00
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection2.80
Respect3.70
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.21
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.20
Questions3.20
Eric W Frew 12 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.46
Contribution4.46
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.06
Reflection4.46
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback3.07
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Nicholas Scott Campbell 5 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Dale A Lawrence 4 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kurt Karl Maute 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Daniel J. Scheeres 4 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.20
Alia Khan 10 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 6

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
3 more syllabi

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.