Course record ARTS
ARTS 1212
Painting for Non-Majors
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable15 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Samira Hemmat 33 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.24
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.69
Grading3.40
Reflection4.13
Respect4.70
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.66
Questions4.28
Samara Johnson 11 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.31
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.51
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.05
Contribution3.92
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.77
Grading3.25
Reflection3.77
Respect4.34
Creativity3.77
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.09
Challenge3.92
Questions3.95
Tyler Jon Alpern 135 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.24
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.63
Reflection4.61
Respect4.73
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.74
Questions4.77
John David Defeo 49 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.44
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.46
Reflection4.56
Respect4.84
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.72
Questions4.94
Marcella Marsella 48 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.77
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.62
Reflection4.25
Respect4.35
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.19
Interaction3.76
Challenge3.84
Questions4.40
Michael Alexander Yates 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Madeline Job 27 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.37
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.86
Reflection4.83
Respect4.97
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Mike F Womack 4 reported responses 3.11Eval / 5
Overall3.11 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology1.50
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.30
Connection1.50
Contribution2.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.30
Reflection3.30
Respect3.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions3.30
Paul Kenneth 12 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.55
Contribution4.72
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.42
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Hannah Purvis 10 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.51
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.92
Reflection4.96
Respect4.96
Creativity4.96
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.59
Questions4.99
Andrea Caretto 8 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Brionna Garcia 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.15
Connection5.00
Contribution4.62
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.62
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.62
Questions5.00
Ethan Cherry 31 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.54
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.61
Reflection4.39
Respect4.74
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.72
Questions4.56
Cesar Bejarano Herrejon 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Luis Perez Moreno 16 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.81
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.61
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.78
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions4.98
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.