Course record ARTS
ARTS 1020
Introduction to Studio Art 2
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable21 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Alejandra Abad 11 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology3.86
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.89
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.09
Grading3.75
Reflection3.68
Respect4.42
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.94
Questions3.60
Georgianna Tsouhlarakis 43 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.21
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.08
Reflection4.47
Respect5.00
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.77
Questions4.65
Dennis Kieran Doyle 31 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.38
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.22
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.62
Questions4.72
Samara Johnson 14 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.85
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.35
Reflection3.35
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.85
Questions3.90
Harris Benjamin Deno 12 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.59
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.14
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.75
Reflection4.59
Respect4.95
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions4.95
Sarah Jean Mccormick 3 reported responses 2.21Eval / 5
Overall2.21 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.30
Technology1.70
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration2.30
Connection2.00
Contribution3.30
Discussion2.70
Inclusivity2.30
Grading2.30
Reflection2.00
Respect2.30
Creativity2.30
Feedback1.70
Interaction3.30
Challenge1.70
Questions2.30
Noa Joyce Fodrie 24 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.76
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.58
Reflection4.52
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.87
Questions4.84
Anna Graef 11 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.38
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.13
Reflection3.87
Respect4.98
Creativity4.76
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.40
Questions4.74
Amy Hoagland 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Molly Ott 7 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Abigail Grix 20 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology3.12
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.01
Connection3.55
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.96
Grading3.33
Reflection3.93
Respect3.97
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.79
Questions3.45
Clara Nulty 7 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.10
Misuhng Suh 36 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology3.71
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.40
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.81
Reflection4.52
Respect4.41
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.35
Questions4.17
Tiana Boisseau-Palo 1 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Molly Valentine Dierks 6 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Maya Buffett-Davis 30 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.55
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.76
Reflection4.60
Respect4.92
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
Tenaya Dewitt 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Erin Hyunhee Kang 3 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andi Newberry 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Paul Kenneth 36 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.81
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.91
Reflection4.91
Respect4.96
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Molly Pluenneke 8 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.