Course record ARTS
ARTS 1012
Drawing for Non-Majors
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable15 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Laura Rebecca Benson 28 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.61
Connection3.69
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.05
Reflection4.12
Respect4.74
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.57
Questions4.38
Robert Martin Buehler 23 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.37
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.92
Reflection4.86
Respect4.91
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.73
Questions4.89
Jeremiah Palecek 30 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.46
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration2.27
Connection3.97
Contribution3.96
Discussion3.24
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.01
Reflection4.22
Respect4.68
Creativity4.78
Feedback3.26
Interaction3.43
Challenge4.72
Questions3.87
Allison Elizabeth Lemon 15 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration3.92
Connection3.72
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.46
Reflection4.38
Respect4.85
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.57
Questions4.92
Samira Hemmat 41 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.26
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.79
Reflection4.60
Respect4.84
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.70
Questions4.49
Michael Alexander Yates 18 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.03
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.38
Reflection4.29
Respect4.89
Creativity4.85
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.61
Questions4.17
Andrea Caretto 29 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.63
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.69
Reflection4.62
Respect4.87
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.69
Questions4.62
Alli Lemon 16 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.14
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.30
Reflection4.46
Respect4.57
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.40
Questions4.04
John David Defeo 2 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.50
Questions4.50
Hannah Purvis 23 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.71
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.72
Reflection4.82
Respect4.96
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.51
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.13
Questions4.51
Cesar Bejarano Herrejon 7 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.77
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.18
Respect4.46
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.23
Questions4.77
Ethan Cherry 24 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.11
Connection3.90
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.88
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.52
Questions4.81
Erin Hyunhee Kang 10 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.10
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.22
Reflection4.31
Respect4.13
Creativity4.72
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.42
Questions4.34
Brionna Garcia 18 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.42
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.87
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.84
Reflection4.95
Respect4.93
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.88
Questions4.90
Ashley Ivye 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.03
Technology3.35
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration3.28
Connection3.23
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.23
Reflection4.09
Respect4.95
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.18
Questions4.23
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.