Course record ARTH
ARTH 1600
U.S. Art Across Cultures
University of Colorado Boulder
1,760 grades31 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Christine E Bachman 382 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
382 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bachman vs. the course average
A
+10.6
B
−1.0
C
−5.1
D
−1.2
F
−3.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 14 of 396 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.70
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.36
Reflection4.65
Respect4.86
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
James M. Cordova 758 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
758 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cordova vs. the course average
A
+1.6
B
−3.2
C
−0.2
D
+0.1
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 34 of 792 enrolled.
Overall3.67 / 5
328 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.01
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.82
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity3.72
Feedback3.38
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.82
Questions3.82
Robert Nauman 620 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
620 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nauman vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
+4.5
C
+3.4
D
+0.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 56 of 676 enrolled.
Overall3.93 / 5
212 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.58
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.47
Contribution4.06
Discussion3.73
Inclusivity4.41
Grading3.35
Reflection3.53
Respect4.14
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.14
Challenge3.71
Questions3.75
Avery Glassman 37 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.13
Reflection4.53
Respect4.77
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.47
Questions4.50
Kristin Virginia Enright 34 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.33
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.93
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.37
Questions4.77
Caroline Everts 40 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.03
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.23
Reflection4.33
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.27
Questions4.50
Jerryan Nicole Ramos Hernandez 27 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.70
Reflection4.33
Respect4.60
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.70
Questions4.20
Lauren Elizabeth Hooten 51 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.86
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.89
Reflection4.88
Respect4.95
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.82
Questions4.91
Elizabeth Langyher 44 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.47
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.57
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.57
Questions4.60
Lexi Peterson 38 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.33
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.49
Reflection4.47
Respect4.82
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.55
Questions4.69
Mattelyn Caroline Hough 32 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.03
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.50
Questions4.67
Emily Lauren Berkes 39 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.42
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.73
Reflection4.59
Respect4.79
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.54
Questions4.64
Shawn Christopher Simmons 50 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.27
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.61
Reflection4.56
Respect4.88
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.16
Questions4.73
Jasmine Guillermina Gloria 18 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.53
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.90
Reflection4.67
Respect4.63
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Natana M Aldana 20 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.17
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.50
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.57
Grading3.30
Reflection4.37
Respect4.17
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.10
Questions4.07
Alexa Davidson 26 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.31
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.72
Reflection4.56
Respect4.66
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.52
Questions4.77
Mattie Hough 16 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.55
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.35
Questions4.55
Kat Bertram 29 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.22
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.61
Reflection4.70
Respect4.97
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.71
Questions4.97
Natalie Ginez 24 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.29
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.13
Reflection4.16
Respect4.55
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.11
Questions4.32
Taite Shomo 23 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.14
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.77
Reflection4.44
Respect4.83
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.45
Questions4.69
Brittany Ashley 37 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.22
Contribution3.69
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.31
Reflection4.42
Respect4.65
Creativity3.58
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.49
Challenge3.99
Questions4.53
Sam Hensley 22 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.15
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.91
Reflection4.85
Respect4.97
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.71
Questions4.97
Lena Rodriguez 29 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.32
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration3.29
Connection3.47
Contribution4.16
Discussion3.07
Inclusivity4.67
Grading2.92
Reflection3.69
Respect3.84
Creativity3.61
Feedback2.43
Interaction3.32
Challenge3.53
Questions2.85
Felicity Wong 59 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.29
Connection3.74
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.04
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.27
Reflection4.36
Respect4.59
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.92
Questions3.79
Bella Malherbe 27 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.21
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.28
Reflection4.59
Respect4.86
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.47
Questions4.29
Taylor Smith 12 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Courtney Pierce 2 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Kat Deck-Portillo 10 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.00
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.63
Reflection4.58
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.35
Sequoia Belk-Hurst 6 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.27
Contribution4.73
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.73
Reflection4.57
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.90
Questions4.73
Isis Exum 6 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.67
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.33
Reflection4.40
Respect4.83
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.73
Questions4.93
William Holt 4 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection5.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.