Course record ARTH
ARTH 1500
Global Art and Visual Culture
University of Colorado Boulder
1,403 grades32 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score30/100
Below average
Stephanie Wenhui Su 765 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
765 letter grades
Compare with the course
Su vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−2.3
C
−1.8
D
−0.8
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 24 of 789 enrolled.
Overall3.92 / 5
252 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.01
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.00
Contribution3.63
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.80
Reflection3.82
Respect4.61
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.02
Challenge3.92
Questions3.83
Christine E Bachman 638 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
638 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bachman vs. the course average
A
−6.7
B
+2.7
C
+2.2
D
+1.0
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 23 of 661 enrolled.
Overall3.79 / 5
452 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology3.94
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration3.36
Connection3.64
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity4.37
Grading3.96
Reflection3.77
Respect4.47
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.47
Interaction3.98
Challenge3.75
Questions4.14
Caroline Everts 17 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.17
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Kristin Virginia Enright 18 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.83
Connection3.77
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.63
Respect4.73
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Avery Glassman 18 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.63
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.87
Questions4.83
Denise Alor 13 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.97
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.67
Connection3.37
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.47
Reflection3.90
Respect4.23
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.43
Interaction3.97
Challenge3.63
Questions3.53
Jerryan Nicole Ramos Hernandez 24 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.93
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.73
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.53
Questions4.57
Elizabeth Langyher 17 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.90
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.67
Reflection4.53
Respect4.67
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.37
Questions4.90
Mattelyn Caroline Hough 29 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.33
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.80
Reflection4.53
Respect4.93
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.47
Questions4.87
Natana M Aldana 21 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.37
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.93
Reflection4.37
Respect4.63
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.20
Questions4.27
Jasmine Guillermina Gloria 21 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.65
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Shawn Christopher Simmons 43 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.18
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.68
Reflection4.57
Respect4.76
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.51
Questions4.93
Emily Lauren Berkes 58 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.22
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.69
Reflection4.56
Respect4.67
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.40
Questions4.67
Lexi Peterson 57 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.19
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.56
Reflection4.64
Respect4.79
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.48
Questions4.57
Lauren Elizabeth Hooten 28 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology3.79
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration3.84
Connection3.69
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.58
Reflection4.44
Respect4.56
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.31
Questions4.04
Mattie Hough 23 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.77
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.77
Reflection4.47
Respect4.47
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Kat Bertram 33 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.81
Connection3.89
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.46
Reflection4.24
Respect4.54
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.04
Questions4.67
Alexa Davidson 22 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.45
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.73
Reflection4.68
Respect4.86
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.63
Questions4.93
Sam Hensley 34 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.47
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.63
Reflection4.71
Respect4.92
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.59
Questions4.90
Natalie Ginez 52 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.68
Connection3.51
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity4.43
Grading3.54
Reflection3.85
Respect4.49
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.02
Challenge3.52
Questions4.16
Taite Shomo 33 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.58
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.89
Reflection4.86
Respect4.86
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.78
Questions4.87
Brittany Ashley 37 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.07
Connection3.77
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.36
Reflection4.18
Respect4.72
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.19
Questions4.38
Felicity Wong 52 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.98
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.44
Reflection4.49
Respect4.70
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.51
Questions4.70
Courtney Pierce 36 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.89
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.89
Reflection4.88
Respect4.94
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.90
Questions4.88
Bella Malherbe 36 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.49
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.92
Connection3.91
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.20
Reflection4.24
Respect4.75
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.13
Questions4.54
Maggie Henry 6 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Lena Rodriguez 8 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology3.57
Synthesis3.42
Collaboration2.62
Connection3.42
Contribution3.42
Discussion3.28
Inclusivity4.38
Grading2.89
Reflection3.80
Respect4.34
Creativity4.20
Feedback2.03
Interaction2.96
Challenge3.28
Questions3.34
Kat Deck-Portillo 18 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.90
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.40
Reflection4.13
Respect4.33
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.07
Questions4.23
Isis Exum 17 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.63
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.43
Respect4.83
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.53
Questions4.83
Isabella Praslin 7 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Taylor Smith 23 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.20
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
William Holt 33 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.80
Reflection4.57
Respect4.97
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.67
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.