Course record ARCH
ARCH 3100
Studio 2: Intermediate Architecture
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable23 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Susannah Drake 12 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Scott Vangenderen 27 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.73
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.55
Reflection4.46
Respect4.92
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.78
Questions4.54
Neal Evers 11 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Marianne Bellino 9 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Marcel Sebastian De Lange 8 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Susan Atkinson Glenn 14 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Gage Christopher Duran 11 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Marianne Holbert 12 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.97
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.99
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.81
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jade Venus Polizzi 19 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.89
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.56
Reflection4.61
Respect4.97
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.89
Questions4.90
Ping Xu 23 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.38
Contribution4.07
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.29
Reflection4.49
Respect4.68
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.68
Questions3.89
Azhar Ahmed Khan 8 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Ross F Barney 27 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.96
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.63
Reflection4.84
Respect4.82
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.69
Questions4.83
Lei Shi 23 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.52
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.21
Grading2.74
Reflection4.22
Respect4.23
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.44
Questions4.16
Gregory G Uitto 6 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Valeria Henao Cano 12 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Mark Rukamathu 23 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.64
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.27
Reflection4.53
Respect4.76
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.65
Questions4.67
Chad Kipfer 5 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Caitlin Charlet 6 reported responses 3.31Eval / 5
Overall3.31 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading1.80
Reflection3.20
Respect3.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.30
Challenge3.80
Questions3.50
Amanda Chase Lee 20 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.83
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.28
Reflection4.76
Respect4.80
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.78
Questions4.57
Shital Dighe Barman 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Drew Dutcher 4 reported responses 3.38Eval / 5
Overall3.38 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading2.00
Reflection3.50
Respect3.80
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions2.80
Martin Paddack 10 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Alicja Vernoica Hudson 13 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.