Course record ARCH
ARCH 2100
Studio 1: Foundations of Architecture
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable21 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Elizabeth Jane Smith 4 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kimberly Alaine Drennan 9 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Marianne Bellino 6 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Rachel Ann Lavine 7 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
James Brantley Hightower 7 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Gage Christopher Duran 15 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.52
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.62
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.68
Questions4.86
John Brandon Anderson 22 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.53
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.24
Reflection4.13
Respect4.78
Creativity4.56
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.16
Questions4.45
Guadalupe Cantu 32 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.72
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.25
Reflection4.55
Respect4.78
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.62
Questions4.83
Thomas M Brady Jr 9 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Lei Shi 18 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.45
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.63
Grading2.16
Reflection3.85
Respect3.81
Creativity4.24
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.19
Questions3.62
Janna Lynn Ferguson 10 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Susan Atkinson Glenn 11 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Chad Kipfer 8 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.34
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.34
Reflection4.34
Respect4.55
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.45
Questions4.93
Mark Rukamathu 23 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.64
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.14
Reflection4.68
Respect4.57
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.76
Questions4.87
Caitlin Charlet 23 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology3.94
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.24
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.33
Grading3.30
Reflection4.08
Respect4.22
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.37
Questions4.04
Amanda Chase Lee 20 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.78
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.41
Reflection4.48
Respect4.48
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.58
Questions4.57
Elizabeth Isbell Smith 7 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.77
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.46
Connection5.00
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.72
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.72
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Martin Paddack 22 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.85
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.98
Contribution4.92
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.57
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.88
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.92
Challenge5.00
Questions4.98
Maria J Simon 2 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions3.00
Molly Ann Schmidt 9 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.30
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions3.80
Nesrine Mansour 2 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.50
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.