Course record APRD
APRD 4405
Strategic Communication Capstone
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable28 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Kelly Sue Kinner 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Diane Marie Elliston 66 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.79
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.43
Reflection4.76
Respect4.74
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.87
Questions4.89
Jen Constable 115 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
115 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.93
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.44
Reflection4.72
Respect4.88
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.72
Questions4.74
Lisa Lorraine Poole 40 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.82
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.23
Reflection4.54
Respect4.26
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.89
Questions4.24
Dawn Doty 46 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.98
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.06
Reflection4.97
Respect4.52
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.97
Questions4.05
Ron Henry Iori 13 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.92
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.03
Reflection4.49
Respect4.30
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.73
Questions4.73
Dustin P Finkel 25 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.74
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.56
Reflection4.37
Respect4.35
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.35
Questions4.74
Quinn Kelsey 9 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
George Scott Bain 16 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Irma J Fisher 7 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Loni Marie Peterson 57 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.99
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.71
Reflection4.89
Respect4.95
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.59
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.95
Maxim Lenderman 5 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.08
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.62
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.77
Grading2.38
Reflection4.85
Respect4.62
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.62
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.62
Erin N Willis 19 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.98
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.95
Reflection4.91
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Cheri Lynn Felix 70 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.91
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.90
Reflection4.81
Respect4.99
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.89
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Angelica Lolita Kalika 5 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Scott Christopher Lee 4 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Morgan Young 45 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.98
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.50
Reflection4.86
Respect4.78
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.95
Questions4.88
Bailey Gannett 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Krishnamurthy Sriramesh 17 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.66
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.42
Reflection4.34
Respect4.42
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.19
Questions3.88
Karen B Reid 41 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.25
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.45
Reflection4.05
Respect4.20
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.05
Questions4.20
Erin E Schauster 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Jordan Morehouse 28 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.88
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.22
Reflection4.52
Respect4.82
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.52
Questions4.67
David William Nottoli 25 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.27
Reflection4.54
Respect4.85
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.77
Questions4.69
Loribeth Greenan 42 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.90
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.77
Reflection4.94
Respect4.93
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.93
Questions4.94
Charles L Trowbridge 10 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.69
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.46
Reflection4.69
Respect4.77
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.77
Questions4.85
Norman Dale Shearer 5 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Eric S Forsyth 5 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.60
Reflection3.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.40
Questions4.20
Mia Wang 14 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.