Course record APRD
APRD 3301
Social Media Strategies
University of Colorado Boulder
743 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed record
David Lee Slayden 35 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Slayden vs. the course average
A
+23.3
B
−20.2
C
−2.6
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall3.61 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.70
Reflection3.90
Respect4.20
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.50
Questions3.70
Bianca Antoinette Anderson 96 grades · 1 term 3.93GPA
96 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anderson vs. the course average
A
+17.0
B
−13.9
C
−2.6
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 97 enrolled.
Overall3.87 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.03
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.16
Collaboration3.94
Connection3.79
Contribution3.43
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity3.17
Grading3.01
Reflection3.11
Respect4.39
Creativity3.46
Feedback3.15
Interaction3.83
Challenge3.16
Questions3.42
Samantha Fields Alviani 53 grades · 1 term 3.91GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Alviani vs. the course average
A
+15.7
B
−14.5
C
−0.7
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 3 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Dayna L Davis 258 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
258 letter grades
Compare with the course
Davis vs. the course average
A
+7.0
B
−6.2
C
−0.6
D
−0.4
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 258 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.86
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.74
Reflection4.64
Respect4.93
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.59
Questions4.91
Joshua Ross Foust 47 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Foust vs. the course average
A
−0.1
B
+3.2
C
−2.6
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 1 of 48 enrolled.
Bailey Gannett Decamillis 38 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Decamillis vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
+6.1
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.
Julie Meyers 85 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
85 letter grades
Compare with the course
Meyers vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
+5.7
C
−0.2
D
+3.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 86 enrolled.
Overall4.14 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology3.46
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration3.24
Connection4.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.47
Reflection4.06
Respect4.51
Creativity4.44
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.11
Questions3.61
Lisa Lorraine Poole 28 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Poole vs. the course average
A
−41.0
B
+44.1
C
−2.6
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 1 of 29 enrolled.
Overall3.84 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Tobias Hopp 77 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hopp vs. the course average
A
−23.5
B
+18.8
C
+5.2
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.9% withdrew · 4 of 81 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Pritha Agarwal 26 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Agarwal vs. the course average
A
−45.9
B
+33.7
C
+12.8
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
7.1% withdrew · 2 of 28 enrolled.
Overall2.94 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.40
Grading2.60
Reflection2.90
Respect3.45
Creativity3.05
Feedback1.85
Interaction3.60
Challenge2.45
Questions3.65
Josh Foust 15 reported responses 2.97Eval / 5
Overall2.97 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.29
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.27
Collaboration3.94
Connection3.41
Contribution3.22
Discussion2.96
Inclusivity3.01
Grading2.14
Reflection3.12
Respect2.94
Creativity3.08
Feedback1.78
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.28
Questions2.30
Bailey Gannett 8 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.73
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.57
Questions4.80
Woojin Kim 56 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.65
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.46
Reflection4.46
Respect4.82
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.30
Questions4.78
Sangwook Lee 47 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.55
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.34
Reflection4.38
Respect4.84
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.56
Questions4.69
Henry Ugwu 6 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Pooja Iyer 18 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Eric S Forsyth 9 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.