Course record APRD
APRD 3103
Public Relations Writing
University of Colorado Boulder
481 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score61/100
Strong
Peter L Knierim 97 grades · 1 term 3.86GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Knierim vs. the course average
A
+20.9
B
−14.6
C
−5.6
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 97 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.64
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.28
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.84
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.73
Questions4.53
Samantha Fields Alviani 46 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Alviani vs. the course average
A
+16.1
B
−14.2
C
−1.3
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.92 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.98
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.95
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Seow Ting Lee 77 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
+5.7
C
−3.0
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 78 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.34
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.33
Reflection4.32
Respect4.58
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.48
Questions4.60
Michelle Denise Miles 38 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Miles vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−1.8
C
−0.4
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.95
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.79
Reflection4.75
Respect4.91
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.88
Questions4.95
Karen B Reid 35 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reid vs. the course average
A
−10.9
B
+17.1
C
−5.6
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.24
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.68
Grading3.58
Reflection4.65
Respect4.54
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.34
Questions4.40
Charles L Trowbridge 39 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
39 letter grades
Compare with the course
Trowbridge vs. the course average
A
−1.7
B
−2.4
C
−0.5
D
+2.1
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 1 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.15
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.40
Reflection3.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.00
Krishnamurthy Sriramesh 32 grades · 1 term 2.75GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sriramesh vs. the course average
A
−55.3
B
+33.4
C
+22.5
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 1 of 33 enrolled.
Overall3.30 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.47
Technology1.15
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration1.70
Connection1.66
Contribution3.94
Discussion3.49
Inclusivity2.15
Grading2.45
Reflection3.02
Respect3.56
Creativity3.02
Feedback1.64
Interaction3.56
Challenge2.52
Questions2.15
Danielle Santos Quichocho 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.93 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Alexandra Mayhew 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Emily Anne King Kinsey 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.66GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Dawn Doty 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.46GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.
Overall4.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Lisa Lorraine Poole 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.46GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
4.8% withdrew · 1 of 21 enrolled.
Overall3.87 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect3.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.00
Jane E Dvorak 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.13GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 14 enrolled.
Overall3.66 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology2.70
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.20
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.00
Burton St John 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.94GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
16.7% withdrew · 2 of 12 enrolled.
Overall3.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.54
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.26
Reflection4.63
Respect4.49
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.49
Interaction3.86
Challenge4.54
Questions4.63
Marina Dmukhovskaya 10 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Jordan Morehouse 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.49
Connection5.00
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.55
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.46
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.58
Questions4.74
Loribeth Greenan 70 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.93
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.75
Reflection4.83
Respect4.88
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.89
Questions4.90
Henry Ugwu 12 reported responses 3.33Eval / 5
Overall3.33 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading2.30
Reflection2.90
Respect4.10
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.20
Challenge3.20
Questions3.80
Erin N Willis 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.