Course record APRD
APRD 3006
History of Advertising
University of Colorado Boulder
1,031 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Christopher Michael Znerold 29 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Znerold vs. the course average
A
+20.4
B
−11.7
C
−7.1
D
−0.8
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
David William Nottoli 268 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
268 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nottoli vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
+1.1
C
−4.5
D
+0.3
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 3 of 271 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
147 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.81
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.60
Reflection4.72
Respect4.79
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.71
Questions4.71
Peter L Knierim 302 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
302 letter grades
Compare with the course
Knierim vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−1.8
C
+0.9
D
+0.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 2 of 304 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
156 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.63
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.29
Reflection4.58
Respect4.81
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.81
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.30
Questions4.75
Melinda Kiger Cheval 372 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
372 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cheval vs. the course average
A
−2.8
B
−0.1
C
+3.1
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 3 of 375 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
161 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.45
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity4.28
Grading3.95
Reflection4.49
Respect4.08
Creativity4.59
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.34
Questions4.04
Julie Meyers 60 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
60 letter grades
Compare with the course
Meyers vs. the course average
A
−12.1
B
+10.8
C
−0.4
D
−0.8
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 3 of 63 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Melinda J Cheval 161 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
161 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.45
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity4.28
Grading3.95
Reflection4.49
Respect4.08
Creativity4.59
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.34
Questions4.04
Chris M Znerold 12 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Michelle Honald 154 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
154 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.74
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.85
Reflection4.73
Respect4.80
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.72
Questions4.76
Joshua Ross Foust 3 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Emily Anne King Kinsey 13 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.20
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Raaj Chandran 1 reported responses 2.25Eval / 5
Overall2.25 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis1.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection1.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect2.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction2.00
Challenge2.00
Questions3.00
Saima A Kazmi 5 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
David Lee Slayden 9 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology2.60
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.80
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.30
Grading2.60
Reflection2.90
Respect4.10
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.60
Questions3.70
Kyle Harris 19 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Jon D Ligon 63 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.28
Connection4.54
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.67
Reflection4.44
Respect4.67
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.34
Questions4.69
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.