Course record APRD
APRD 1003
Principles of Strategic Communication
University of Colorado Boulder
2,875 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average
Irma J Fisher 619 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
619 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fisher vs. the course average
A
+19.5
B
−10.9
C
−6.1
D
−1.6
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 6 of 625 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
416 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.51
Connection4.75
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.47
Reflection4.29
Respect4.71
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.57
Questions4.63
Diane Marie Elliston 588 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
588 letter grades
Compare with the course
Elliston vs. the course average
A
−1.3
B
+2.1
C
−0.3
D
−0.7
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 7 of 595 enrolled.
Overall3.95 / 5
470 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.32
Connection4.66
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.27
Reflection4.19
Respect4.53
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.04
Challenge4.30
Questions4.37
Kelty Irene Logan 1,668 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
1,668 letter grades
Compare with the course
Logan vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+3.3
C
+2.4
D
+0.9
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 38 of 1,706 enrolled.
Overall3.96 / 5
260 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.06
Connection4.45
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.12
Reflection4.07
Respect4.44
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.02
Challenge4.06
Questions4.22
Rajesh Chandran 152 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
152 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology4.21
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration2.94
Connection4.37
Contribution3.47
Discussion3.84
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.22
Reflection3.82
Respect4.47
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.53
Interaction3.91
Challenge3.98
Questions4.13
Stacy Louise Lanyon 74 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.50
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Erin N Willis 255 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
255 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.07
Connection4.44
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.31
Reflection4.07
Respect4.51
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.02
Challenge4.36
Questions4.42
Josh Foust 160 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5
160 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.98
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration2.35
Connection4.27
Contribution3.09
Discussion3.53
Inclusivity3.82
Grading3.86
Reflection3.65
Respect3.89
Creativity3.43
Feedback3.41
Interaction3.52
Challenge3.67
Questions4.05
Kyle Harris 187 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
187 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.69
Collaboration2.59
Connection4.36
Contribution3.32
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.13
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.83
Interaction3.71
Challenge4.01
Questions4.37
Burton St John 155 reported responses 3.30Eval / 5
Overall3.30 / 5
155 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.62
Technology3.37
Synthesis3.56
Collaboration2.34
Connection4.27
Contribution3.09
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.82
Grading3.52
Reflection3.68
Respect3.53
Creativity3.17
Feedback2.87
Interaction3.56
Challenge3.25
Questions3.41
Henry Ugwu 66 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.62
Contribution3.78
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.23
Reflection4.15
Respect4.58
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.43
Questions4.50
Kate Friedel 33 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Matea Beukelman 124 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
124 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.74
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.36
Reflection4.18
Respect4.57
Creativity3.79
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.07
Challenge4.36
Questions4.52
Hunter Reeves 116 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
116 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.74
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.23
Reflection4.21
Respect4.62
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.06
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Weiyu Ding 67 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.80
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.09
Reflection4.32
Respect4.59
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.37
Questions4.55
David William Nottoli 113 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
113 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.76
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.06
Inclusivity4.41
Grading3.88
Reflection4.31
Respect4.37
Creativity3.81
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.92
Questions4.19
Cheri Lynn Felix 18 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Gbenga Arikenbi 31 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.