Course record APPM

APPM 2360

Introduction to Differential Equations with Linear Algebra

University of Colorado Boulder

4,610 grades121 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score14/100
Needs work

Professors 121 of 121

Jonathan R Kish 385 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
32.2% A
26.8% B
31.4% C
2.6% D
7.0% F

385 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kish vs. the course average
A +10.9
B −2.1
C −0.4
D −2.3
F −6.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 7 of 392 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Patrick G Sprenger 89 grades · 1 term 2.61GPA
28.1% A
25.8% B
34.8% C
5.6% D
5.6% F

89 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sprenger vs. the course average
A +6.8
B −3.0
C +3.0
D +0.7
F −7.5

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 4 of 93 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Eric R Thaler 1,488 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
24.9% A
30.6% B
28.4% C
4.8% D
11.4% F

1,488 letter grades

Compare with the course
Thaler vs. the course average
A +3.6
B +1.7
C −3.5
D −0.1
F −1.7

Difference in percentage points.

5.2% withdrew · 82 of 1,570 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Keith Julien 227 grades · 1 term 2.46GPA
22.0% A
34.4% B
27.3% C
4.0% D
12.3% F

227 letter grades

Compare with the course
Julien vs. the course average
A +0.7
B +5.5
C −4.5
D −0.9
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

5.8% withdrew · 14 of 241 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Colin J Mitchell 70 grades · 1 term 2.44GPA
25.7% A
27.1% B
31.4% C
5.7% D
10.0% F

70 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mitchell vs. the course average
A +4.4
B −1.7
C −0.4
D +0.8
F −3.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 5 of 75 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Nathan Duignan 99 grades · 1 term 2.43GPA
21.2% A
26.3% B
37.4% C
3.0% D
12.1% F

99 letter grades

Compare with the course
Duignan vs. the course average
A −0.1
B −2.6
C +5.6
D −1.9
F −1.0

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 4 of 103 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Nancy Rodriguez Bunn 159 grades · 1 term 2.37GPA
18.9% A
29.6% B
34.6% C
4.4% D
12.6% F

159 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bunn vs. the course average
A −2.4
B +0.7
C +2.8
D −0.5
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

10.2% withdrew · 18 of 177 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Igor E Rumanov 122 grades · 1 term 2.35GPA
19.7% A
30.3% B
32.0% C
4.1% D
13.9% F

122 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rumanov vs. the course average
A −1.6
B +1.5
C +0.1
D −0.8
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

8.3% withdrew · 11 of 133 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Mark Hoefer 106 grades · 1 term 2.35GPA
15.1% A
38.7% B
28.3% C
1.9% D
16.0% F

106 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hoefer vs. the course average
A −6.2
B +9.8
C −3.5
D −3.0
F +2.9

Difference in percentage points.

7.8% withdrew · 9 of 115 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jan Adam Norris 367 grades · 1 term 2.34GPA
18.8% A
33.8% B
28.6% C
3.0% D
15.8% F

367 letter grades

Compare with the course
Norris vs. the course average
A −2.5
B +4.9
C −3.2
D −1.9
F +2.7

Difference in percentage points.

10.3% withdrew · 42 of 409 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Lewis R Baker 184 grades · 1 term 2.33GPA
20.7% A
26.6% B
34.2% C
3.8% D
14.7% F

184 letter grades

Compare with the course
Baker vs. the course average
A −0.6
B −2.2
C +2.4
D −1.1
F +1.6

Difference in percentage points.

13.6% withdrew · 29 of 213 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Manjul Sharma 289 grades · 1 term 2.32GPA
20.1% A
29.1% B
31.5% C
4.5% D
14.9% F

289 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sharma vs. the course average
A −1.2
B +0.2
C −0.3
D −0.4
F +1.8

Difference in percentage points.

10.0% withdrew · 32 of 321 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Judith Law 145 grades · 1 term 2.20GPA
20.0% A
24.1% B
31.0% C
8.3% D
16.6% F

145 letter grades

Compare with the course
Law vs. the course average
A −1.3
B −4.7
C −0.8
D +3.4
F +3.4

Difference in percentage points.

6.5% withdrew · 10 of 155 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Timothy S Wessler 63 grades · 1 term 2.19GPA
17.5% A
23.8% B
34.9% C
12.7% D
11.1% F

63 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wessler vs. the course average
A −3.8
B −5.1
C +3.1
D +7.8
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

6.0% withdrew · 4 of 67 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Edward Yoshiteru Yasutake 260 grades · 1 term 2.13GPA
13.8% A
25.8% B
35.8% C
10.4% D
14.2% F

260 letter grades

Compare with the course
Yasutake vs. the course average
A −7.5
B −3.1
C +3.9
D +5.5
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.1% withdrew · 17 of 277 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Bradley W Hindman 93 grades · 1 term 2.12GPA
10.8% A
23.7% B
47.3% C
6.5% D
11.8% F

93 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hindman vs. the course average
A −10.5
B −5.2
C +15.5
D +1.6
F −1.3

Difference in percentage points.

9.7% withdrew · 10 of 103 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Juan G Restrepo 242 grades · 1 term 2.04GPA
12.0% A
24.0% B
40.9% C
5.0% D
18.2% F

242 letter grades

Compare with the course
Restrepo vs. the course average
A −9.3
B −4.9
C +9.1
D +0.1
F +5.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 11 of 253 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jonathan Adam Belcher 160 grades · 1 term 1.93GPA
10.6% A
24.4% B
36.9% C
5.0% D
23.1% F

160 letter grades

Compare with the course
Belcher vs. the course average
A −10.7
B −4.5
C +5.1
D +0.1
F +10.0

Difference in percentage points.

5.9% withdrew · 10 of 170 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Yifeng Mao 62 grades · 1 term 1.80GPA
11.3% A
14.5% B
43.5% C
8.1% D
22.6% F

62 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mao vs. the course average
A −10.0
B −14.4
C +11.7
D +3.2
F +9.5

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 1 of 63 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Caleb Penner 20 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.95
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Hao Xu 10 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Arunima Prakash 22 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.11
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration4.26
Connection3.21
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity2.69
Grading4.16
Reflection4.26
Respect4.60
Creativity3.81
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.64
Challenge3.72
Questions4.26
Open full professor record
Nathaniel Mathews 10 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.39
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.61
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.37
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.86
Respect5.00
Creativity3.42
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.14
Questions4.98
Open full professor record
Sage Byron Shaw 11 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.25
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.55
Reflection4.05
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Nicholas Landry 17 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.71
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.02
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.53
Reflection4.78
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.48
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Corbit R Sampson 79 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

79 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.32
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.36
Reflection4.62
Respect4.82
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.73
Questions4.89
Open full professor record
Edward Tortorici 23 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.15
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.68
Reflection4.65
Respect4.88
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.40
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Alexander Robert Schein 56 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.71
Connection3.83
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.46
Grading4.40
Reflection4.57
Respect4.51
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.47
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Nicholas William Barendregt 50 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.97
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.52
Reflection4.83
Respect4.89
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Douglas Brunson 7 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration3.00
Connection2.70
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.15
Respect4.85
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.05
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Jan Adam Norris Ii 117 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5

117 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.04
Synthesis3.08
Collaboration3.39
Connection3.93
Contribution3.09
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.81
Grading3.50
Reflection3.58
Respect4.08
Creativity3.15
Feedback3.57
Interaction3.97
Challenge3.11
Questions4.05
Open full professor record
Sabina Adhikari 71 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

71 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.38
Connection3.78
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.83
Reflection4.00
Respect4.64
Creativity4.14
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.11
Questions4.31
Open full professor record
Kiera Van Der Sande 20 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.95
Connection3.05
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.20
Reflection4.05
Respect4.45
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Yassin Bahid 32 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.32
Connection3.99
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.29
Reflection4.53
Respect4.73
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.46
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Shalini Randika Mahanthege 27 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.60
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.95
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Daniel Ferguson 12 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.20
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Sara K Tro 81 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology3.84
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.54
Connection3.48
Contribution3.81
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.15
Reflection4.13
Respect4.70
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.44
Challenge3.94
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Nuojin Cheng 11 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.95
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.95
Reflection4.55
Respect4.95
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Kevin Michael Doherty 10 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Amanda Kelly Lococo 27 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.08
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.55
Reflection4.62
Respect4.97
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Osita Eluemuno Onyejekwe 11 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.42
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.31
Reflection4.04
Respect4.85
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.85
Challenge3.81
Questions4.08
Open full professor record
Jacob Wharey Sitison 19 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.66
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.18
Collaboration3.28
Connection2.87
Contribution3.59
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity1.30
Grading4.08
Reflection4.24
Respect4.63
Creativity3.69
Feedback3.51
Interaction4.04
Challenge3.94
Questions4.47
Open full professor record
Hannan Shahba 13 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.74
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity3.39
Grading4.42
Reflection4.54
Respect4.54
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.57
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Erin Maree Ellefsen 8 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.20
Connection2.30
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.75
Reflection3.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Cooper Ray Simpson 6 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.70
Grading2.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Christian Moore Carley 21 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology3.44
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.34
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.17
Reflection4.40
Respect4.82
Creativity3.69
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.28
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Jackson Wagner 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.85
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.05
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Harrison Wolf 7 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.70
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Kyle Patrick Fitzgerald 9 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Wuyan Wang 39 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.57
Contribution4.26
Discussion3.74
Inclusivity3.07
Grading4.37
Reflection4.64
Respect4.94
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Samuel Johannes Ryskamp 4 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.25
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.75
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Serena Joy Dileonardo 16 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.95
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.67
Reflection4.27
Respect4.95
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.49
Questions4.59
Open full professor record
Theodore John Eberts 4 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Madi Yerlanov 40 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration3.29
Connection3.25
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.31
Grading4.28
Reflection4.22
Respect4.39
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.13
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.29
Questions3.99
Open full professor record
Evan David Gorman 17 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.29
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.80
Contribution3.49
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.25
Grading3.93
Reflection4.05
Respect4.36
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.32
Questions4.27
Open full professor record
April Tran 23 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology3.78
Synthesis3.38
Collaboration4.25
Connection2.96
Contribution3.58
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.12
Reflection4.25
Respect4.56
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.05
Questions4.01
Open full professor record
Teddy Eberts 8 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.65
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Leo Alexander Crowder 23 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.37
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.25
Reflection4.55
Respect4.50
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.47
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Anna Kinne Granquist 23 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.19
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.54
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.86
Open full professor record
Nikolay Yegovtsev 6 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.25
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.10
Reflection3.65
Respect4.10
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.40
Questions4.25
Open full professor record
Alex Schein 42 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.69
Connection3.78
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity3.08
Grading3.90
Reflection4.35
Respect4.30
Creativity3.99
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.36
Questions4.41
Open full professor record
Caleb Allen Jacobs 12 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.75
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Zach Malik 9 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.40
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.20
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Eappen Sebastian Nelluvelil 26 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.11
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.48
Reflection4.89
Respect4.91
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.72
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Camille Renaud 16 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.14
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.46
Reflection4.71
Respect4.62
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.65
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Jack Quinn 33 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.86
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration4.61
Connection3.70
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity3.14
Grading4.58
Reflection4.49
Respect4.42
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.28
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Kal Parvanov 20 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.63
Connection3.90
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.07
Respect4.30
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.90
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Will Magrogan 30 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.94
Connection3.78
Contribution3.76
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity1.98
Grading3.24
Reflection4.28
Respect3.55
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.91
Questions4.18
Open full professor record
Addie Mccurdy 27 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.85
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Tyler Jensen 7 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Alicia Wu 17 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.13
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.69
Reflection4.62
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Kaloyan Parvanov Parvanov 8 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.95
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Johanna Mccombs 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.13
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.53
Reflection4.73
Respect4.77
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.73
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Frank Seidl 8 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.85
Reflection3.75
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.30
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
David Armendariz 19 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.00
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.43
Reflection4.55
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.68
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Connor Loehde-Woolard 16 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.82
Connection3.61
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.10
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Noah Parks 17 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.51
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.41
Reflection4.79
Respect4.74
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.69
Questions4.69
Open full professor record
Nikole Scribner Trout 29 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.19
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.18
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.74
Questions4.76
Open full professor record
Ari Geisler 27 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.20
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.66
Reflection4.68
Respect4.68
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.58
Questions4.88
Open full professor record
Rachel Suzanne Tutmaher 25 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Gavriil Shchedrin 95 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

95 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.43
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.81
Connection3.88
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.33
Grading3.82
Reflection4.29
Respect4.58
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.54
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Emma Opper 29 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.14
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.42
Reflection4.67
Respect4.64
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.51
Questions4.79
Open full professor record
John Maddox 41 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.16
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.62
Reflection4.62
Respect4.83
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.61
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
James Hyun 19 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.04
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.44
Reflection4.63
Respect4.94
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.75
Questions4.94
Open full professor record
Poom Kritpracha 49 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

49 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.63
Connection3.49
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity2.83
Grading3.98
Reflection4.29
Respect4.46
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.14
Questions4.58
Open full professor record
Erin Obermayer 33 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.08
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.84
Reflection4.80
Respect4.97
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.84
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Sina G Lewis 11 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.35
Connection2.25
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.55
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Jack Krebsbach 26 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.78
Connection3.98
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.64
Reflection4.69
Respect4.92
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.53
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Ethan Shade 45 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

45 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.97
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.53
Reflection4.72
Respect4.78
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Christina Wang 4 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Graham Mauer 43 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.33
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.67
Reflection4.86
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Levi Barksdale 58 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.31
Connection3.74
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.19
Reflection4.50
Respect4.52
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.48
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Sean Svihla 20 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.72
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.53
Connection3.91
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.04
Grading4.29
Reflection4.27
Respect4.71
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.77
Questions4.82
Open full professor record
Brian Ha 18 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.35
Contribution3.25
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.60
Grading4.25
Reflection4.45
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.95
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.55
Open full professor record
Will Houser 23 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.08
Connection3.45
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.13
Reflection4.03
Respect4.63
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.13
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Benjamin Lombardi 10 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Charlie Montes 12 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.35
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.05
Open full professor record
Natalie Eid 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Arshaun Raofi 11 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.33
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.83
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.43
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Julian Xie 19 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.80
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.35
Reflection4.63
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.57
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Cooper Doe 8 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.34
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.95
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity2.54
Grading3.62
Reflection4.20
Respect4.07
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.34
Questions4.38
Open full professor record
Eduardo Corona 15 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.10
Contribution2.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.40
Reflection3.70
Respect4.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.40
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Moyi Tian 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Grace Moberg 15 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.45
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Bao Nguyen 37 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.81
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.18
Reflection4.44
Respect4.45
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.39
Questions4.62
Open full professor record
David Zhou 19 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.25
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.35
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Cole Patten 12 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.85
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.25
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Ella Grace Finstuen 6 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Ebube Anozie 39 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.78
Connection3.85
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.39
Reflection4.55
Respect4.57
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.55
Questions4.71
Open full professor record
Luke Legoullon 36 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology3.98
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.41
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.64
Grading3.77
Reflection4.20
Respect4.44
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.29
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Dorothy Suzuki-Burke 11 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Kate Knyazeva 11 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.95
Reflection4.75
Respect4.30
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Matthew Leduc 11 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.05
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.95
Questions4.65
Open full professor record
Andrew Grace 33 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.10
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Yermal Sujeet Bhat 38 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.80
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Immie Cresswell 10 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Madison Jones 15 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Lucy Wilson 15 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.43
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.73
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Haoru Yang 16 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.27
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.47
Reflection4.60
Respect4.83
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Nirab Hossain 20 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.43
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.68
Reflection4.08
Respect4.75
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Bryce Wall 17 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.10
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.77
Reflection4.67
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.