Course record APPM

APPM 2350

Calculus 3 for Engineers

University of Colorado Boulder

2,247 grades80 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work

Professors 80 of 80

Jonathan R Kish 216 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
33.3% A
32.9% B
26.4% C
2.8% D
4.6% F

216 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kish vs. the course average
A +15.1
B +1.7
C −7.2
D −3.9
F −5.7

Difference in percentage points.

4.0% withdrew · 9 of 225 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Daniel Seneca Lindsey 33 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
30.3% A
21.2% B
39.4% C
6.1% D
3.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lindsey vs. the course average
A +12.1
B −9.9
C +5.8
D −0.7
F −7.3

Difference in percentage points.

10.8% withdrew · 4 of 37 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Maribeth Bleymaier Oscamou 451 grades · 1 term 2.55GPA
23.7% A
30.6% B
31.0% C
8.0% D
6.7% F

451 letter grades

Compare with the course
Oscamou vs. the course average
A +5.5
B −0.6
C −2.6
D +1.3
F −3.7

Difference in percentage points.

7.6% withdrew · 37 of 488 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Dylan James Abrahamsen 37 grades · 1 term 2.42GPA
16.2% A
32.4% B
35.1% C
10.8% D
5.4% F

37 letter grades

Compare with the course
Abrahamsen vs. the course average
A −2.0
B +1.3
C +1.5
D +4.1
F −4.9

Difference in percentage points.

11.9% withdrew · 5 of 42 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Yermal Sujeet Bhat 189 grades · 1 term 2.41GPA
19.0% A
31.2% B
36.5% C
4.2% D
9.0% F

189 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bhat vs. the course average
A +0.8
B +0.1
C +2.9
D −2.5
F −1.3

Difference in percentage points.

7.4% withdrew · 15 of 204 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Robert W Benim 92 grades · 1 term 2.39GPA
21.7% A
28.3% B
31.5% C
7.6% D
10.9% F

92 letter grades

Compare with the course
Benim vs. the course average
A +3.5
B −2.9
C −2.1
D +0.9
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

7.1% withdrew · 7 of 99 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Richard C Mcnamara 108 grades · 1 term 2.31GPA
14.8% A
38.0% B
26.9% C
6.5% D
13.9% F

108 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mcnamara vs. the course average
A −3.4
B +6.8
C −6.7
D −0.2
F +3.6

Difference in percentage points.

12.2% withdrew · 15 of 123 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Matthew Paul Reichenbach 26 grades · 1 term 2.29GPA
11.5% A
30.8% B
42.3% C
3.8% D
11.5% F

26 letter grades

Compare with the course
Reichenbach vs. the course average
A −6.7
B −0.4
C +8.7
D −2.9
F +1.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 1 of 27 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Eric R Thaler 579 grades · 1 term 2.27GPA
13.6% A
29.5% B
39.2% C
7.3% D
10.4% F

579 letter grades

Compare with the course
Thaler vs. the course average
A −4.6
B −1.6
C +5.6
D +0.5
F same

Difference in percentage points.

6.3% withdrew · 39 of 618 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Sean D Nixon 188 grades · 1 term 2.23GPA
13.3% A
36.7% B
26.1% C
6.4% D
17.6% F

188 letter grades

Compare with the course
Nixon vs. the course average
A −4.9
B +5.5
C −7.5
D −0.3
F +7.2

Difference in percentage points.

13.8% withdrew · 30 of 218 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jan Adam Norris 207 grades · 1 term 2.17GPA
11.6% A
31.9% B
32.9% C
10.1% D
13.5% F

207 letter grades

Compare with the course
Norris vs. the course average
A −6.6
B +0.7
C −0.8
D +3.4
F +3.2

Difference in percentage points.

8.8% withdrew · 20 of 227 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jonathan Adam Belcher 28 grades · 1 term 2.06GPA
17.9% A
17.9% B
39.3% C
3.6% D
21.4% F

28 letter grades

Compare with the course
Belcher vs. the course average
A −0.3
B −13.3
C +5.7
D −3.1
F +11.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 2 of 30 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Jose Pablo Lucero Lorca 54 grades · 1 term 2.04GPA
5.6% A
27.8% B
46.3% C
3.7% D
16.7% F

54 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lorca vs. the course average
A −12.6
B −3.4
C +12.7
D −3.0
F +6.3

Difference in percentage points.

8.5% withdrew · 5 of 59 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Mark Hoefer 39 grades · 1 term 1.92GPA
7.7% A
30.8% B
35.9% C
5.1% D
20.5% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hoefer vs. the course average
A −10.5
B −0.4
C +2.3
D −1.6
F +10.2

Difference in percentage points.

4.9% withdrew · 2 of 41 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Heather Lynn Cihak 48 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.21
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.48
Reflection4.74
Respect4.86
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.68
Questions4.61
Open full professor record
Kevin Michael Doherty 14 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.55
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Lyndsey Julia Wong 21 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.93
Connection2.97
Contribution3.63
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.67
Grading4.40
Reflection4.07
Respect4.83
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.33
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Andrew Osborne 16 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.17
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.63
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.07
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.43
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Guohui Ding 8 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.25
Reflection4.55
Respect4.65
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.65
Questions4.15
Open full professor record
Sara K Tro 20 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.57
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.03
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.00
Questions4.47
Open full professor record
Theodore John Eberts 18 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.04
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.48
Reflection4.86
Respect4.72
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.72
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
David S Stearns 27 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.88
Connection3.50
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.06
Reflection4.40
Respect4.43
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.22
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Maribeth Bleymaier 39 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Jacob Wharey Sitison 20 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.40
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.63
Reflection4.53
Respect4.70
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.63
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Daniel D Spiegel 15 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.33
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.47
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.50
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Emily Webb 11 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.45
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Edward Tortorici 5 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.20
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.60
Reflection3.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Kyle Patrick Fitzgerald 15 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.93
Connection3.10
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.47
Reflection4.60
Respect4.83
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Yassin Bahid 17 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.33
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.97
Reflection4.27
Respect4.60
Creativity4.83
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.43
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Wuyan Wang 15 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.57
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity2.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.53
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.10
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Serena Joy Dileonardo 18 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.90
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.43
Respect4.73
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.30
Questions4.57
Open full professor record
Jackson Skeen Curry 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Zachary James Wiens 17 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.51
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.23
Grading4.54
Reflection4.66
Respect4.78
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.82
Questions4.81
Open full professor record
Zachary Christopher Sajevic 12 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.09
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration5.00
Connection2.95
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity2.69
Grading3.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.69
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.15
Questions4.22
Open full professor record
Zachariah Malik 16 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.47
Reflection4.73
Respect5.00
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.83
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Zach Wiens 28 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.18
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.28
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.20
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Allen Alvarez Loya 5 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Josã© Lucero Lorca 13 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Eappen Sebastian Nelluvelil 11 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.47
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.60
Reflection4.57
Respect4.83
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.50
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Arpiar Avetis Grigorian 11 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.83
Connection2.43
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity2.50
Grading2.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.07
Interaction4.43
Challenge3.80
Questions3.13
Open full professor record
Kal Parvanov 18 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.13
Technology3.60
Synthesis2.97
Collaboration3.17
Connection3.10
Contribution3.47
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity2.83
Grading4.17
Reflection3.63
Respect4.50
Creativity3.07
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.87
Challenge3.73
Questions4.43
Open full professor record
Jan Adam Norris Ii 51 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology3.26
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration3.07
Connection3.45
Contribution3.52
Discussion3.84
Inclusivity2.61
Grading3.32
Reflection3.63
Respect4.13
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.81
Interaction3.77
Challenge3.55
Questions3.70
Open full professor record
Matthew Leduc 16 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.13
Connection3.53
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.43
Respect4.30
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.47
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Teddy Eberts 10 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.05
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.35
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Tyler Jensen 11 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.45
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.15
Grading4.45
Reflection4.65
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.25
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Frank Seidl 9 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.00
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.13
Respect4.93
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.20
Questions4.63
Open full professor record
Carolyn Fulton 38 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.93
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.58
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.77
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Jonathan Homan 25 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.66
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.59
Collaboration3.53
Connection3.37
Contribution3.32
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.34
Reflection3.84
Respect3.98
Creativity3.54
Feedback3.62
Interaction3.74
Challenge3.76
Questions3.98
Open full professor record
Allyson Hineman 24 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.93
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.27
Grading4.70
Reflection4.83
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.83
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Kate Boden 24 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.86
Connection3.85
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity3.93
Grading3.97
Reflection4.97
Respect4.90
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.87
Questions4.96
Open full professor record
Johanna Mccombs 15 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.20
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.53
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.57
Challenge3.87
Questions4.03
Open full professor record
Kevin Julien Bonnet 17 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.67
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.67
Connection2.93
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.40
Reflection4.47
Respect4.73
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Matt Reichenbach 9 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Nicolas Coloma Carphio 14 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.50
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.77
Reflection4.83
Respect4.93
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Caleb Allen Jacobs 39 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.88
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.30
Reflection4.48
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.55
Questions4.53
Open full professor record
Erin Obermayer 19 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.13
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.50
Reflection4.67
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.77
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Jonathan Shaw 52 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.28
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.55
Reflection4.83
Respect4.90
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Brian Ha 21 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration3.08
Connection3.78
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.33
Reflection4.45
Respect4.68
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.48
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Connor Loehde-Woolard 11 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.25
Reflection4.65
Respect4.55
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.45
Open full professor record
Mohit Garg 33 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.64
Contribution3.51
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.13
Reflection4.35
Respect4.49
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.49
Open full professor record
Maia Richards-Dinger 13 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.85
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.55
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Ryan Yik Wah Lau 12 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.67
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity2.60
Grading4.43
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.43
Questions4.67
Open full professor record
Colin J Mitchell 10 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Sean Svihla 30 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.75
Connection3.85
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.08
Reflection4.43
Respect4.93
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.25
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.68
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Emma Opper 29 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.63
Reflection4.80
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.80
Questions4.97
Open full professor record
Will Magrogan 36 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.47
Connection3.89
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.34
Reflection4.54
Respect4.68
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.43
Questions4.56
Open full professor record
Brian Tran 43 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.30
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.14
Grading4.42
Reflection4.50
Respect4.62
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.65
Questions4.72
Open full professor record
Haoru Yang 17 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.93
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.37
Reflection4.63
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.73
Open full professor record
Jade Buzinski 29 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.37
Connection3.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.63
Respect4.87
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.77
Questions4.77
Open full professor record
Nikole Scribner Trout 18 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.53
Connection3.60
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.47
Reflection4.43
Respect4.77
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Ari Geisler 7 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Graham Mauer 12 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.07
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.40
Reflection4.37
Respect4.93
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.87
Open full professor record
Bryce Wall 25 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.13
Grading4.50
Reflection4.47
Respect4.87
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.83
Open full professor record
Gabriel Cowley 11 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.13
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.13
Reflection4.73
Respect4.93
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction3.57
Challenge4.63
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
David Zhou 12 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.10
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Open full professor record
Robert Pawloski 15 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.03
Connection3.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.37
Reflection4.17
Respect4.87
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.57
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Ella Grace Finstuen 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.80
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Blake Musfeldt 7 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Cole Patten 19 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.13
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.53
Respect4.93
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.93
Open full professor record
Marion Lara 3 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.