Course record ANTH
ANTH 4020
Explorations in Anthropology
University of Colorado Boulder
402 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed record
Gerardo Gutierrez 119 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
119 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gutierrez vs. the course average
A
+22.9
B
−16.4
C
−7.0
D
+1.6
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 5 of 124 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.91
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.92
Reflection4.91
Respect4.93
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.91
Questions4.96
Carole Ann Mcgranahan Ph.D. 25 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−4.3
C
−7.0
D
−1.7
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
7.4% withdrew · 2 of 27 enrolled.
Douglas Bamforth 75 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bamforth vs. the course average
A
+13.7
B
−13.7
C
+2.4
D
−1.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.52
Connection5.00
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.68
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.92
Questions4.65
William Taylor 30 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Taylor vs. the course average
A
−0.3
B
+4.3
C
−7.0
D
−1.7
F
+4.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.87 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.94
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.85
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.90
Eric Edward Jones 34 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jones vs. the course average
A
−7.0
B
+5.9
C
−4.0
D
+4.1
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 34 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Arthur A Joyce 27 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Joyce vs. the course average
A
−27.3
B
+15.8
C
+15.3
D
−1.7
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
10.0% withdrew · 3 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology3.29
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.64
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.12
Grading3.63
Reflection3.94
Respect4.61
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.22
Questions4.22
Kristen Drybread 92 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
92 letter grades
Compare with the course
Drybread vs. the course average
A
−33.1
B
+25.3
C
+8.3
D
−0.7
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 2 of 94 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.84
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.62
Grading3.23
Reflection4.14
Respect4.60
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.13
Interaction4.24
Challenge3.72
Questions3.78
Carole Ann Mcgranahan 18 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.68
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.62
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.89
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Bailey Jude Duhe 21 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.72
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.99
Reflection4.99
Respect4.99
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.53
Questions4.98
Jason Bartholomew Scott 9 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration3.61
Connection4.85
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.93
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.69
Questions5.00
Timothy Aaron Webmoor 17 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.51
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.78
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.89
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.51
Challenge5.00
Questions4.89
Laura M Deluca 23 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology3.92
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.55
Reflection4.86
Respect4.86
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.92
Questions4.57
Ferrell Page Mcclean 18 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.09
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.05
Reflection4.20
Respect4.05
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.05
Questions4.19
Christian Stanford Hammons 6 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Stephania Zneimer 17 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.59
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.42
Reflection4.68
Respect4.40
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.66
Questions4.24
Jerry Keith Jacka 10 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Georgia Baldwin Butcher 16 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.99
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.41
Reflection4.99
Respect4.65
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.96
Questions5.00
Gabrielle Cabrera 4 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.