Course record ANTH
ANTH 3119
The Archaeology of Death
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Sarah Anne James 77 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.09
Contribution3.61
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.31
Reflection4.38
Respect4.62
Creativity4.57
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.48
Questions4.13
Catherine Claire Goode 7 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.05
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.90
Questions4.25
Hannah Madeline Slough 11 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.55
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Travis Rick Rupp 52 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.28
Connection3.84
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.38
Reflection4.20
Respect4.79
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.12
Questions4.68
Kate Goode 9 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.05
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.15
Questions4.60
Andrew Rivadeneira 20 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.48
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.38
Reflection4.72
Respect4.92
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.63
Questions4.95
Elise Ramsey 8 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.75
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Cassie Winkley 11 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.25
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.85
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.45
Tanner Frick 5 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.65
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.60
Autumn Greene 7 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.30
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions4.25
Claire Hook 7 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.85
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.45
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
James Chanfrau 7 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Emma Malinasky 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tauriel Zhang 3 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Najely Tridas May 5 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.35
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.10
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.35
Questions4.35
Adam Maggiore 8 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.