Course record ANTH

ANTH 2040

Laboratory in Human Biological Variation and Adaptation

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable18 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score58/100
Mixed record

Professors 18 of 18

Oliver C.C. Paine 4 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
John Dalton 5 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.12
Technology4.69
Synthesis2.94
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.41
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.19
Grading5.00
Reflection3.87
Respect5.00
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.06
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.78
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Julie Marion Thomas 12 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.95
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect4.97
Creativity4.92
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Olivia Lauren Kimes 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Yuting Gao 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Daniel Joseph Naumenko 21 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.96
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.98
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.52
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Skye Barger 4 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.35
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Oliver Charles Colvill Paine 4 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Collin Ross Power 4 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Stephania Zneimer 4 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.75
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.75
Reflection5.00
Respect4.75
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Fernando Villanea Guevara 30 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.43
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.32
Reflection4.69
Respect4.60
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Emily Opack 6 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.20
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.35
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.15
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Jack Dalton 15 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.94
Synthesis3.64
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.28
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.16
Reflection4.05
Respect4.31
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.45
Questions4.05
Open full professor record
Yuti Gao 37 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.57
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.28
Reflection4.49
Respect4.53
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.55
Questions4.46
Open full professor record
Michael Orellana 4 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Nicholas Hartman 18 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.91
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.62
Reflection4.91
Respect4.92
Creativity3.99
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions4.92
Open full professor record
Nate Lindsay 5 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.88
Contribution4.95
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.65
Grading5.00
Reflection4.82
Respect4.82
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Stela Nomenjanahary 12 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.95
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.75
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.55
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.85
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.