Course record ANTH
ANTH 1170
Exploring Culture and Gender through Film
University of Colorado Boulder
4,165 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed record
Christian Stanford Hammons 3,907 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
3,907 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hammons vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−0.1
C
−0.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 51 of 3,958 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
1,359 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.83
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.43
Reflection4.74
Respect4.82
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.72
Questions4.56
Sara Reed Jamieson 258 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
258 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jamieson vs. the course average
A
−7.0
B
+1.8
C
+4.5
D
+0.2
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 3 of 261 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.89
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.31
Reflection4.74
Respect4.93
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.68
Questions4.76
Hwa Yeon Lee 103 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration3.04
Connection4.57
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.83
Grading3.94
Reflection4.35
Respect4.63
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.62
Interaction3.89
Challenge4.25
Questions4.17
Anden Harald Drolet 7 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.65
Reflection4.25
Respect4.90
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Toma Serban Peiu 23 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Ferrell Page Mcclean 15 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.45
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Thomas Edward Hanson 21 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.43
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.81
Grading3.99
Reflection4.15
Respect4.81
Creativity3.36
Feedback3.22
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.84
Questions4.27
Eliseo Ortiz 28 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.88
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.12
Connection4.28
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.53
Grading3.29
Reflection4.05
Respect4.40
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.61
Interaction3.95
Challenge3.81
Questions4.16
Patrick Cruz 26 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.65
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.00
Reflection4.55
Respect4.71
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.53
Questions4.77
Burditt Andrew Zackary 14 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.95
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Katherine V Fischer 16 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.10
Reflection4.83
Respect5.00
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Caitrin Scarlett Engle 11 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.05
Reflection4.95
Respect4.85
Creativity3.55
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.65
Georgia Baldwin Butcher 26 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Anna Kari Hermann 14 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.55
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Kathleen Elizabeth Donlan 10 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.25
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.75
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Kate Fischer 38 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.84
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.32
Reflection4.84
Respect4.85
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.62
Questions4.68
Lillian Petersen 76 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Adi Prakash 71 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.