Course record ANTH
ANTH 1140
Exploring a Non-Western Culture: The Maya
University of Colorado Boulder
899 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Sarah Jill Kurnick 723 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
723 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kurnick vs. the course average
A
−2.0
B
+1.6
C
+0.6
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 30 of 753 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
201 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.39
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.59
Reflection4.28
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.37
Questions4.48
Jeffrey Scott Brzezinski 143 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
143 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brzezinski vs. the course average
A
+3.4
B
−3.6
C
−1.9
D
+1.4
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 1 of 144 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.09
Connection3.99
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.37
Reflection4.18
Respect4.68
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.81
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.54
Questions4.33
Inga E Calvin 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.83GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Rachel K Egan 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.23GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Overall3.93 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.40
Melanie Elaine Matteliano 13 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.25
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Devin Brent Pettigrew 9 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.50
Contribution3.75
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.95
Reflection3.65
Respect4.15
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.95
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.45
Questions3.45
Kevin Darcy Jr 20 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.55
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.80
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Jacob Matthew Jansen 20 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.35
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.85
Andrew Aceves 53 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.54
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.36
Reflection4.39
Respect4.70
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.37
Questions4.47
Nicholas Alexander Puente 27 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.59
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.86
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.30
Reflection4.11
Respect4.79
Creativity3.81
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.74
Courtney Cote 14 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.55
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.45
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.55
Questions4.80
Kelsey Rose Hoppes 26 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.28
Technology3.38
Synthesis3.22
Collaboration3.39
Connection3.46
Contribution3.59
Discussion3.41
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.52
Reflection3.87
Respect3.97
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.21
Interaction3.62
Challenge3.43
Questions3.45
Sasha Buckser 19 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.15
Questions4.65
Robin James 14 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.35
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.35
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.40
Questions4.35
Isabelle Adnson 30 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.84
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.42
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.31
Questions4.55
Cristian Figueroa 17 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.32
Connection3.85
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.36
Reflection4.27
Respect4.86
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.52
Questions4.63
Kelsey Armeni 8 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.