Course record ENGRMAE

ENGRMAE 91

Introduction to Thermodynamics

University of California-Irvine

4,345 grades32 sections14 professors
Grades: 2014–2025
Flunk Score1/100
Needs work

Professors 14 of 14

N. Asgari 234 grades · 1 term · 2020 3.63GPA
77.4% A
15.4% B
3.4% C
2.6% D
1.3% F

234 letter grades · 1 section · 2020

Compare with the course
Asgari vs. the course average
A +56.0
B −16.8
C −29.1
D −7.7
F −2.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.4% withdrew · 1 of 235 enrolled.

X. Shi 389 grades · 2 terms · 2024–2025 2.98GPA
32.9% A
38.8% B
24.7% C
0.8% D
2.8% F

389 letter grades · 2 sections · 2024–2025

Compare with the course
Shi vs. the course average
A +11.6
B +6.6
C −7.9
D −9.5
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

1.3% withdrew · 5 of 394 enrolled.

S. Nam 458 grades · 2 terms · 2022–2024 2.92GPA
28.6% A
43.2% B
22.5% C
4.4% D
1.3% F

458 letter grades · 2 sections · 2022–2024

Compare with the course
Nam vs. the course average
A +7.3
B +11.1
C −10.1
D −5.9
F −2.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 458 enrolled.

K. Montazeri 39 grades · 1 term · 2019 2.81GPA
25.6% A
41.0% B
23.1% C
10.3% D
0.0% F

39 letter grades · 1 section · 2019

Compare with the course
Montazeri vs. the course average
A +4.3
B +8.9
C −9.5
D same
F −3.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

L. Kulinsky 447 grades · 3 terms · 2020–2022 2.67GPA
25.7% A
33.6% B
29.3% C
8.1% D
3.4% F

447 letter grades · 3 sections · 2020–2022

Compare with the course
Kulinsky vs. the course average
A +4.4
B +1.4
C −3.2
D −2.2
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.9% withdrew · 4 of 451 enrolled.

R. Gundevia 232 grades · 1 term · 2021 2.49GPA
14.7% A
33.2% B
40.1% C
9.5% D
2.6% F

232 letter grades · 1 section · 2021

Compare with the course
Gundevia vs. the course average
A −6.7
B +1.0
C +7.5
D −0.8
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.3% withdrew · 3 of 235 enrolled.

J. Xiong 227 grades · 1 term · 2016 2.37GPA
10.6% A
29.5% B
44.9% C
11.5% D
3.5% F

227 letter grades · 1 section · 2016

Compare with the course
Xiong vs. the course average
A −10.8
B −2.7
C +12.4
D +1.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 227 enrolled.

B. Padak 286 grades · 1 term · 2019 2.37GPA
13.3% A
28.7% B
42.0% C
11.5% D
4.5% F

286 letter grades · 1 section · 2019

Compare with the course
Padak vs. the course average
A −8.0
B −3.5
C +9.4
D +1.3
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

0.3% withdrew · 1 of 287 enrolled.

S. Hassaan 196 grades · 1 term · 2023 2.34GPA
21.9% A
23.5% B
28.6% C
23.5% D
2.6% F

196 letter grades · 1 section · 2023

Compare with the course
Hassaan vs. the course average
A +0.6
B −8.7
C −4.0
D +13.2
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 196 enrolled.

Z. Noroozi 181 grades · 6 terms · 2014–2024 2.34GPA
18.2% A
31.5% B
28.7% C
11.6% D
9.9% F

181 letter grades · 6 sections · 2014–2024

Compare with the course
Noroozi vs. the course average
A −3.1
B −0.7
C −3.8
D +1.4
F +6.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Summer 2014Summer 2024

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 181 enrolled.

A. Ziaee 51 grades · 1 term · 2017 2.32GPA
15.7% A
29.4% B
33.3% C
11.8% D
9.8% F

51 letter grades · 1 section · 2017

Compare with the course
Ziaee vs. the course average
A −5.6
B −2.8
C +0.8
D +1.5
F +6.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 51 enrolled.

R. Rangel 1,356 grades · 8 terms · 2014–2025 2.31GPA
11.4% A
32.0% B
38.7% C
13.6% D
4.2% F

1,356 letter grades · 8 sections · 2014–2025

Compare with the course
Rangel vs. the course average
A −9.9
B −0.2
C +6.2
D +3.4
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2025

0.7% withdrew · 9 of 1,365 enrolled.

J. Albert 188 grades · 2 terms · 2018 2.23GPA
10.1% A
29.8% B
40.4% C
14.9% D
4.8% F

188 letter grades · 2 sections · 2018

Compare with the course
Albert vs. the course average
A −11.2
B −2.4
C +7.9
D +4.7
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 188 enrolled.

F. Hernandez Gait 61 grades · 2 terms · 2015–2016 2.18GPA
13.1% A
21.3% B
42.6% C
14.8% D
8.2% F

61 letter grades · 2 sections · 2015–2016

Compare with the course
Gait vs. the course average
A −8.2
B −10.9
C +10.1
D +4.5
F +4.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 61 enrolled.

Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.